Accumulation or collection?
Another accumulator here, but by proper arrangement also a collector. A couple of years ago Mike Venturino wrote an article for Handloader or Rifle about collections, and how you can wind up with one without realizing it, or with only a little effort. As examples, he included pictures of groups of guns that he owned that could be considered collections - the one that I remember was a sample of each numbered N frame model, 20 through 29.
He even noted that when he was thinking about putting this together, he mentioned to somone that he didn't know of a Model 26. His friend pointed out (to Mike's embarrassment) that was what the .45 ACP Model of 1950 became.
Remember the comic books of the 1950s, with the lurid crime and horror stories? (Stick with me here.) They were corrupting our youth and contributing to the moral decay and downfall of our nation, much like [pick your favorite poison] is doing today. They even went so far as to have Congressional hearings on the subject, which as we all know will solve any problem.
Anyway, one of the driving forces of this witch hunt was a psychiatrist named Fredric Wertham. He wrote a book warning of the dangers of comic books, and that book title is
"Seduction of the Innocent." (
Seduction of the Innocent - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.)
That's what Venturino's article was to me -
seduction of the innocent. There I was, happily and blindly accumulating. Now the last 18 guns I've bought (except one) have all been Smith & Wessons. And I did Venturino one better - I now have representative samples of (either actually numbered or pre-number) Model 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29. Please - don't make me go into the 30s....