Which M&P 2.0?

[bsmiley]

Favorite M&P 2.0?
Please respond with your choice from the following:
M&P 9mm 2.0 4.25; Compact 4.0 or 3.6
No shields or 5in please.
Thanks

 

[BlackTalonJHP]

Compact 2.0 4 inch for general use
3.6 if you intend to carry appendix IWB

 

[ukcats]

I really like the way the 3.6” Compact shoots and carries.

 

[ultratec00]

Either, depending on availability. The LGS had the 4" on sale but after handling it went with the 3.6" off grabagun. The 3.6" simply looks/feels more proportional, to me, for that size frame and both use the FS mags w/ spacer.

 

[poppoprr]

I have 2, 4" 2.0s. One with safety and one without. Really like the one without the safety and carry it in a OWB Akers belt slide under a light long jacket. IWB in a crossbreed super tuck holster.

Neither the 3.5" of 4" can be pocket carried, by me, so I chose the longer brl because of the longer sight radius, and a little more velocity with the 4".

 

[joshputman]

I recently purchased a 4.25" model without the safety. I was originally going to get the one with the safety, as I'm used to carrying a 1911, but the safety seems to stick out a mile. Therefore I got the one without.

I really like it so far. I have no experience with any other models.

Sent from my LG-SP200 using Tapatalk

 

[labloverva]

9 mm 3.6" barrel!

 

[wnderr]

A Compact for sure. 3.6", because I wanted hi capacity, and conceal-ability! Lots of bullets, and small to conceal. 1/2" in length, just might make a difference in conceal-ability, and 15+1 rounds is hi capacity! Plus, I can slide a full size mag in there should I choose to!

 

[MDFerrell]

Compact 3.6” in 9mm for me as well. Like others, I like the feel and concealablity.

 

[Well Armed]

4.0... I see no need for the 3.6 unless you're planning on AIWB carry. IMHO, the butt of the grip and the thickness is what really affects concealment. All three options share the same thickness and grip length.

 

[Well Armed]

I have 2, 4" 2.0s. One with safety and one without. Really like the one without the safety and carry it in a OWB Akers belt slide under a light long jacket. IWB in a crossbreed super tuck holster.

Neither the 3.5" of 4" can be pocket carried, by me, so I chose the longer brl because of the longer sight radius, and a little more velocity with the 4".

I agreed. I only went with the G19 size because I might want to use the 4.0 in IDPA, and they're more likely to cater to and design rules around the G19. It also helps that the 4.0 on up could be found at a better deal than the 3.6 when I was making my decision. It just wasn't much of a difference to me to warrant spending an extra $50-$60.

I'm still hoping they release a G26 sized M&P 2.0, and ship it with a 2.0 compact mag grip extension...

 

[bsmiley]

Thank you all for responding!!
It seems so far the 3.6 is the favorite choice.

 

[Cornholio]

I went with the 4.0 due to decreased muzzle flip and it just "pointed" more naturally for me. YMMV

 

[veeklog1]

I went with 3.6” 2.0 in 9mm. Just feels and handles great