Why do I want a 39-2?

Joined
Jul 30, 2014
Messages
1,526
Reaction score
2,205
Location
Orlando
I've always liked the way they look. I've read some good, and some bad. I like the blue with the wood grips. I just bought a 1076 and a 622 my first S&W semis other than a Shield. I have several S&W revolvers. I want something kinda pretty, but still a shooter. I'm not a collecter. It won't be my edc. I rarely see one locally. Or even here. Anything to beware of? Price range for a nice shooter? Is GB a good source?

Please feel free to share your photos along with your knowledge. Thank you.
 
Register to hide this ad
Sorry that I have no pictures. I own two 39-2's and they are terrific. On the plus side, they are classic, iconic and historically significant. And it's been my experience across five different pistols that the single action trigger break is REALLY very nice for a high volume production gun. The 39-2 simply feels terrific in my (and most people's) hands. They are easy to field strip and maintain and there are truckloads of parts if something goes wrong. They made nearly 400,000 of these, a true testament, in my opinion.

There are some "negatives", or at least points to be aware of. The alloy frame does wear. A mint one looks all the same blue/black but the upper and lower wear differently over time and use. There are many on the market that may look like they have been drug behind a truck. Accuracy is decent and solid but please don't expect a target pistol. Some will NEVER see this angle but it exists just the same.

Magazines that will fit are still made by S&W and billed as 3906/952. Work 100% but they don't look quite right.

The biggest potential issue or thing to be aware of is that the 1st Gen 39/59 do not have firing pin safeties and there are (rare) cases of metal fatigue/failure of the hammer block. That doesn't mean they are "unsafe", but they absolutely trail modern handguns here in 2016 in that manner. They are not as "drop safe" as a modern, current handgun.

As there were so many made, it's fantastic pistol for a gun lover who has little interest in collecting mint, rare, expensive high grade collectibles. If getting a REALLY great deal is high on your list of priorities -- this is a gun that will give many opportunities to wait for the "right" deal.

Yes, I am a genuine fan of the 39-2 and YES, you should definitely chase one down.
 
I love my 39-2... but I would not rule out a single stack 2nd or 3rd gen if an excellant example comes your way. The later generations have improved sights among other features. But a single stack 39 series is a classic. I'll never be without one (or more).
 
Model 39

I collected Model 39's for years. The early pre-Model 39's had the short safeties which were somewhat awkward to use and the long extractors on both the pre-39's and the steel frame/plain-39's were known to break. and if you should use one of these types today and break the extractor it would be very difficult to get a replacement part for your gun. The Model 39-2's are great guns. The fit very well in one's hand, and can be used with almost any type of ammo. The pre-Model 39's were the first double action pistol made in the United States, and when the different custom gunsmiths/companies ASP, DEVEL, Behlert, and Trapper started cutting down the Model 39's, the Model 39's can be credited with the Smith&Wesson Factory introducing the Model 3913, and subsequent mini guns. To me the Model 39 is the best looking auto pistol Smitn&Wesson made. No Smith&Wesson collection or for that matter gun collection should be without a Model 39.
 
What I want to know is why S&W is still not making the 39-2?
Well, time marches on, really. The 39-2 and it's double stack buddy the 59 were superceded by the 2nd Gen pistols in 1982. Updated features, options, finishes and eventually different sizes also.
 
My first centerfire handgun was a model 39, back in the early 70's. Like a dumbo I traded it off.
A few years ago a friend ( a real horse trader) had one and we did some trading.. I probably got took on the deal but I wanted it. It is a shooter and not a safe queen.

I love the way it fits my hand and it shoots great. But I shot it in a couple local matches and the double action / single action drives me crazy. Always hunting for the trigger for the second shot. :eek: Probably too many years behind a 1911.

But, one of the best pointing handguns I've ever had in my hands..
They are a fun gun to shoot. And are a keeper. Enjoy ...
 

Attachments

  • DSCF0044.jpg
    DSCF0044.jpg
    165.7 KB · Views: 40
Last edited:
Well, time marches on, really. The 39-2 and it's double stack buddy the 59 were superceded by the 2nd Gen pistols in 1982. Updated features, options, finishes and eventually different sizes also.

If S&W can start up production again for the Model 66 as part of their classic series, they should still be making the 39-2 as well! Sig just started making an updated version of their P210 which originally came out in 1949. S&W should do the same with the 39 series.
 
With all due respect... S&W should not bring back the 39-2. I'd like to see a 3rd gen in SS or, perhaps better, a new single stack in SS with the wood grip panels.
 
Nickel 39-2

FWIW-After buying a blue/black 39-2 last year I wish I would have waited to find one in Nickel. As Stevens said the frame and slide finishes age differently. Mine is not in bad shape at all but sorta looks a two-tone pistol.
 

Attachments

  • Model 39-2.jpg
    Model 39-2.jpg
    134.6 KB · Views: 51
All very nice and thanks for the pics. It was also my first purchased back in 74. Price back then was $125 for a new one at my LGS anyway. Traded but am just as happy with my CS-9. Grab one if available as have not seen any out my way.
 
Yes you should.

1. They are good guns....period.
2. Fit and finish are excellent.
3. They are historically significant.
4. They can still be found at fair prices.
5. They are the most beautiful S&W pistol ever (IMO).

Here's my 39-2 that I bought in a pawn shop less than two years ago for $350.

 
Last edited:
Back
Top