Why Model 27's are the coolest S&W's

[jtcarm]

I dunno, I think the N-frame .44 specials can give the them a run for their money.

Besides, the .44 HE first model is the Alpha N-frame

Ohhh, how that Nickle 5" depresses me. 1988 gun show with my late father, found one wearing a $225 price tag. I had a tiny baby at home and moths in my wallet. 2 rows and 20-minutes later, with no begging from me, dad says "That's a good deal, isn't it?", then hand's me the funds. Despite moving through the crowd like an NFL running back, it was gone:-(

The checkering was supposedly to reduce glare, but I think had more to do with Doug Wesson's flamboyance. It was the first cartridge to wear the "Magnum" title. I once read Wesson was inspired by magnums of champagne, implying it was the biggest and best.

 

[mkk41]

The checkering has no functional advantage over the usual treatment given other models. In the real world, the main effect the checkering has is to collect dirt.

Supposed to reduce glare along the sight plane. I guess it could be argued that it weakens the topstrap.

Functional advantage , perhaps not. No more than class II engraving.

Aesthetically pleasing , you betcha!

 

[Twiki357]

I have to agree. A 27-2 was the second gun I ever bought (NIB back in 1962) and it still has it's rightful place on my nightstand. But, the ammo is a little fresher.

 

[semperfi71]

If I could only own ONE S&W it would be a bunch of M27s..................

 

[Quakertown]

27s are unique and the top strap is noteworthy but at the
end of the day I prefer a Python Pete

Well, even fat girls need love, in this case an uneven looking frame to cylinder look, ridiculous vented rib, and hammer that appears to be ready to spear a fish. Have fun with her though..{winces/cringes}

 

[RobC2]

I recently posted a quick comparison after buying my Python between that and my 5" 27-2. I think I may have been a little swayed after dropping the coin I did on the Python. I say give me a 3.5" 27 and I would be happy now. I have never owned one, but always on the lookout. They simple look badass and ooze class at the same time. Very tough to do, like a woman who is both hot and cute at the same time..

 

[jtcarm]

".
A Cadillac and a Chevy are both cars, too...

Bad analogy. The worst car I've ever owned is a Caddy. Luxury is useless without quality.

The 28 is quality,, the 27 quality with luxury. The only functional advantage to me is the partridge post front sight on the longer 27s. I vastly prefer the sight picture to a ramp.

 

[aphelion]

Bad analogy. The worst car I've ever owned is a Caddy. Luxury is useless without quality.

The 28 is quality,, the 27 quality with luxury. The only functional advantage to me is the partridge post front sight on the longer 27s. I vastly prefer the sight picture to a ramp.

This is true. The M28 is every bit the equal of the M27 in fit and precision, which counts more than how shiny it is if you actually want to shoot the thing. Dean Grennell used to say he usually got better accuracy from the 28s he encountered than the 27s. It comes down to the luck of the draw, not any intrisnic difference in function between the two.

 

[TexasRider]

No 28s in my bag yet . As much as they are discussed and liked I am going to have to give one a try . But I am a little like bass and attracted to bright shiny things , so I do have a Model 27 .

 

[glenncal1]

In honor of this long running thread, I took the following 5" 27-2 to the range this weekend. If there is a better revolver out there than the 27 I haven't seen it:

 

[41special]

If I ever buy another 357 it'll likely be a model 27.


41

 

[Ole Joe Clark]

This is an very old thread, but fine Smith & Wesson revolvers are ageless.

Have a blessed day,

Leon

 

[GunarSailors]

I hope you don't mind me throwing my 27-8 in here

 

[BAM-BAM]

My 27s are cooool guns....... only two a 1939 6.5" RM and a 4" shooter grade (recessed) 27-2.

MY 19/66s are a lot more fun to carry all day ......especially my 3" 66.

One of my L-frame's is what I would grab if I could only have one!!!!


Thank God I don't have to choose.........................

 

[Wprovence]

My 27-3.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[S.B.]

I agree, the cool factor is very high for N framed model 27s.
Steve

 

[SLT223]

My 27-3.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Beautiful grips on that!

 

[Shark Bait]

Thanks for bringing this thread back 41special. I'm also a fan of the 27s. I have 4 now. A 3.5 inch pre-27, and 8 3/8 inch 27 no dash (with a 27-2 barrel? ), and a 3.5 inch and 5 inch 27-2. The actions of the 5 inch and 8 3/8 inch are extra nice.

 

[Scott1953]

You're close, but Pre-27s are cooler!

Good shooting.

I agree I have a pre model 27 3.5 inch barrel manufactured in 1955 it is the best would not trade it for a new one. Love those five screws.

 

[dwpmusic]

I have a .357 27-2 in nickel. I would love to have one of the hi-lustre blued 27's with a 4" barrel. They are beautiful revolvers.