I feel that those who rotate based on whim rather than a practical reason think of CCW as something "neat to do" rather than something to be taken seriously. And that's their right, of course. They may be more likely to have an accident though.
?????
That's like saying you're more likely to have an accident in a car/truck with a manual transmission you drive on weekends than with your daily driver that's an automatic.
The rotation thing never made sense to me.
...but isn't it really to justify all the different guns we own?
Like the security person I saw the other day, open carrying a Sig P228...no holster....no gun belt, AND...no round in the chamber! I asked him why, and he gave me all manner of reasons for all four. His life. His choice.
I have read a lot of threads where people mention having a gun in their carry "rotation".
I am having a hard time understanding having more than one carry gun. I have a few guns that are suitable for carry, but only carry one of them.
My thinking is that if I am in a high stress situation I don't want to have to think about what I need to do or what gun I have. I want to have my gun out and ready as quick as possible.
How many of you have a "rotation" of different carry guns and what is the reason behind this?
Thanks
Wingmaster
I feel that those who rotate based on whim rather than a practical reason think of CCW as something "neat to do" rather than something to be taken seriously. And that's their right, of course. They may be more likely to have an accident though.
I decided about 6 months ago to stop “rotating” carry guns and limit myself to either an M&P Shield or an M&P 9. (Since changed to an M&P 9C)
Hick’s Law postulates that the more variables you add to the decision making process the longer it takes you to make a decision and act on it. So if I add variables by carrying different guns in different locations in different types of holsters with varying levels of retention all I’m really doing is adding to the menu options I have to go through in my mind before acting in a self defense scenario. My brain has to answer a series of questions before I can even start to draw my firearm.
Eliminating variables makes anything a human does more consistent and reliable. By definition if I’m in a self defense situation I’m already behind the curve. Every step I have to take to prepare to and defend myself is an opportunity for something to go wrong. Every step or decision that I can eliminate increases the odds in my favor.
It's my belief that the more I practice with my carry gun the better I'm going to be with it under stress. The fewer variables in my equipment the faster I'm going to draw, the less chance of a mistake or hesitation, and the better my chances of survival. I have completely eliminated the variable of what I'm carrying, where, or how. It's always exactly the same. I'm better prepared to defend myself as a result.
That said, (IMO) Having different guns for different circumstances is not the same as “rotating” your carry guns. As I’ve stated before I switch off between one of two guns depending on circumstances and my concealment needs.
90% of the time based on my circumstance I can dress in a way that that accommodates a full sized gun so I carry the M&P9. When I have to dress differently or I’m sitting around the house and I don’t want to carry a full sized gun I carry the 9C but in either case I’m carrying two almost identical guns
To me “rotating” your carry guns is a mood thing. Like “I’m bored with my 1911 so today I’m going to carry my GLOCK” and for me mood has nothing to do with carrying a gun.
I also don’t switch based on any threat assessment. If things are so tense that I’m questioning if I have enough gun I don’t go. Of course the exception would be that I probably wouldn’t carry a 9mm if I were going into the mountains where I literally might encounter a bear.