WWI Era "No-Logo" Revolvers

bmcgilvray

SWCA Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
3,320
Reaction score
6,072
Location
Texas
Apparently Smith & Wesson revolvers went without the characteristic entwined S&W logo for a relatively short period of time around World War I. Reading cuzinbruce's thread (http://smith-wessonforum.com/s-w-ha...0312-old-m-p-followed-me-home-dob-anyone.html) where he shows the Forum his nice, newly acquired 4-inch round butt Military & Police has made me curious about this.

His revolver's serial number is 274XXX and has the logo roll marked onto the side plate. I have No. 296XXX in the same configuration as his revolver but without any logo.

I also have a Model 1903 .32 Hand Ejector, serial number 277XXX, which doesn't feature the logo. I used to have a Model 1903 with a slightly lower serial number that had the logo on its side plate.

Later, the smaller rendition of the logo migrated to the left side of the frame sometime after World War I where it stayed for a decade or so.

Does anyone have any notion of the time period for which logos were deleted or of serial number ranges where logos will not be found on the various frame sizes?

Was there a pattern? May logos be found on either side or not at all on Smith & Wesson revolvers of this area, and with no correlation to serial number sequence? Or does there appear to be a distinct serial number range that features differences in logo location or deletion?

Who has examples of World War I era Smith & Wesson revolvers without logos that they could show? Who has the one with the lowest serial number not featuring the logo and who has the one with the highest serial number without the logo?

DSCF2901.jpg


DSCF2902.jpg



DSCF2215.jpg


DSCF2222.jpg
 
Register to hide this ad
Bryan,

Interesting question - which has come up occasionally. Either, I forgot the answer - or never did read it in the first place. You do have a couple of beauties there - even if they are missing their logos, ... and I would dearly love to run across a round butt revolver like that .38 special of yours!

Best Regards,

Jerry
 
I believe the years for "No-Logo" guns is 1917-1920/21.

We see large logos on the Brit contract 455's thru late 1916. We see logos on the large batch of 455 TL's built in late 1916 to clean up parts and sold commercially.
Production started on the 1917 in March,17, and they have no logos. S&W was constantly hounded for more production by the Gov't. Eventually, using the possibility of Bolshevik inspired labor problems, the Gov't seized the factory in Aug, 18. The machine for rolling logos had long been inactive by then, and POSSIBLY converted to some other use or pushed into a corner and buried. S&W does not get control again till Jan, 1919. We see little and slow production thru most of 1919. It gets better in 1920. Guns shipped in 1919 and 1920 usually lack logos. Some guns shipped in 1921 MAY lack them.
 
Hi Jerry;

You need a round butt K-Frame gun. I have large hands with long fingers and I still really like the way these guns handle. Great for double action shooting. Now that little .32 is just too small for me to shoot well.

Hey, thanks Lee! So "no-logo" continued for several years beyond World War I. It is reasonable to assume that the deletion of the logo had something to do with WWI production efforts.

One also assumes that the entire production was devoted to the government contract M1917 with the possible exception of finishing up commercial guns of all models that were already "in the pipe."

"Eventually, using the possibility of Bolshevik inspired labor problems, the Gov't seized the factory in Aug, 18."

This always seemed a bit sordid all the way around to me. I love reading history but don't know of another instance where the government seized a factory in quite such a manner. The "Red tide" was running high elsewhere in the world during that period and its effects were felt here in the U. S.. I didn't consider that it could have been behind Smith & Wesson's production difficulties which apparently were shameful. Even so, it would appear the government overstepped its bounds to seize control of a company like that. Maybe this incident is an early example of bending the law, like Clinton wanted to do, so that the Wilson administration could accomplish its aims.
 
I have an early .38 Regulation Police (S/N 194, April 1917) with a large logo on the sideplate:

IMG_0447.jpg


An equally early .32 RP (S/N 259152, May 1917) has no logo on either side of the frame.

IMG_0277.jpg


IMG_0282.jpg


This reprocessed .22/32 HFT (S/N 364316, October 1921) has both the small logo on the left side and the single-line address mark on the right-- but this gun was modified at the factory in 1946 and may have been re-marked when it was rebuilt as a Kit Gun and refinished.

IMG_2587.jpg


A .38 M&P from March of 1922 (S/N 400078) has the small logo on the left and no address line on the right. I won't bother with pics because we are pretty far away from WWI by this time.
 
I didn't letter either gun, but here are mine from 1919-ish.

.32 HE 3rd model, SN 299689 - 3 1/4" barrel, Nickel. Hard rubber stocks. No logo

.38 SPL M&P, SN 313625 - 4" barrel, Nickel. Recessed gold medallion stocks. No Logo
 
info

Here is my no logo 22/32 which shipped in 1919, lettered shipped with the Reg. Police grips, they were out of the target grips, the bobbed hammer & knurled trigger were done by A O Niedner who was one of the premier gunsmiths of that era. It also has a factory stamp from being returned to the factory in 1922. This was in the Michael Petrov collection for over 20 yrs. until his untimely death, Michael authored 2 notable gunsmith books & was an A O Niedner collector.
 

Attachments

  • DSCF6192.jpg
    DSCF6192.jpg
    61.9 KB · Views: 38
  • DSCF6195.JPG
    DSCF6195.JPG
    114.2 KB · Views: 37
  • DSCF6193.jpg
    DSCF6193.jpg
    63.8 KB · Views: 30
  • DSCF6198.JPG
    DSCF6198.JPG
    153.6 KB · Views: 32
  • DSCF6201_LI.jpg
    DSCF6201_LI.jpg
    85.8 KB · Views: 42
Last edited:
We shall have to wait and see once this March 1919 shipped Single Shot Perfected Third Model revolver I purchased earlier today has the logo on the left side or not. Stay tuned.
 

Attachments

  • 52CC7EE7-DA7D-4EE8-8ABF-BBC14CB21D24.jpg
    52CC7EE7-DA7D-4EE8-8ABF-BBC14CB21D24.jpg
    15.9 KB · Views: 19
When this thread was started over ten years ago, the data situation was still quite a bit spottier than it is now.

There is no disagreement that logo stamping stopped in mid-1917 and resumed in early 1920.

Of course, stamping is concurrent with production, not shipping, so individual specimen showing a logo or no logo shipped outside those parameters are always possible.
 
Back
Top