FINLAND - The Winter War 1939 -> NATO member 2023 - general matter about Finland

On my behalf, others can also write here anything related to Finland.

I also have a Sissipuukko. The same larger version as you and the original one, which is made to resemble the RK62 bayonet.

In Finland, MORA is synonymous with cheap puukko. MORA is Swedish.
I'll find my knives sometime and photograph them
 
L-35 LAHTI PISTOL​

Developer
The Lahti pistol was developed by Aimo Johannes Lahti (1896–1970), a Finnish weapons designer and self-taught engineer, widely regarded as one of Finland’s most prominent figures in firearms technology. Lahti designed several notable Finnish military weapons, including the Suomi submachine gun and the Lahti-Saloranta M/26 light machine gun, but his namesake pistol, the L-35, remains one of his most famous creations.
Development
The development of the Lahti pistol began in the late 1920s as Finland sought a new service pistol to replace the outdated Parabellum pistol (Luger P08), which had been acquired from Germany in the early years of independence. Aimo Lahti started the design work in 1929, aiming to create a durable, reliable pistol suited to Finland’s cold climate.
Prototypes: The first prototypes were completed in the early 1930s. Lahti drew partial inspiration from the Parabellum’s mechanism (short-recoil principle) but added his own innovations, such as a bolt accelerator, which enhanced reliability in freezing temperatures and dirty conditions.

Production: The final model, L-35, was approved for the Finnish Defence Forces in 1935, with serial production beginning at the State Rifle Factory (VKT) in Jyväskylä in 1938. Production was slow, and by the outbreak of the Winter War (1939–1940), only a small number were ready.

Variants
Several versions of the Lahti pistol were developed, with the most significant being:
L-35 (Finnish Model)
Caliber: 9x19mm Parabellum

Features: 8-round magazine, length 240 mm, weight 1.22 kg (loaded). Included a bolt accelerator and a detachable shoulder stock sleeve (rarely used). Designed to function in -40°C conditions.

Production: Approximately 5,000–6,000 units manufactured in Finland between 1938 and 1950 (estimates vary by source). Serial numbers start from 1001.

Markings: VKT stamp and "SA" (Finnish Army) marking.

Husqvarna m/40 (Swedish Model)
Caliber: 9x19mm Parabellum

Features: Based on the L-35 but simplified and without the bolt accelerator, reducing reliability in cold weather. Manufactured in Sweden by Husqvarna Vapenfabriks AB under license.

Production: Over 83,000 units produced between 1940 and 1946.

Modifications: The Swedes removed some of Lahti’s design features for cost reasons, and the pistol’s appearance differs slightly from the Finnish model (e.g., grip design).

Prototypes and Experiments
Lahti also developed 7.65x21mm Parabellum caliber versions and experimented with various stock and sight options, but these remained prototypes and did not enter widespread use.

Use in Finland
Defence Forces: The L-35 was adopted by the Finnish Defence Forces in the late 1930s, but only about 500 were available during the Winter War. Its use expanded in the Continuation War (1941–1944), where it was issued primarily to officers and special units (e.g., scouts). However, older pistols like the Nagant M1895 and Parabellum remained more common due to limited L-35 production.

Post-War Period: The L-35 stayed in service with the Defence Forces until the 1980s, when it was replaced by modern pistols like the FN HP-DA (Browning Hi-Power). It remained in reserve into the 1990s.

Reputation: The pistol was considered reliable and durable, though its heavy weight and slow production limited its popularity.

Use in Other Countries
Sweden:
m/40: Sweden purchased the L-35 license in 1940 to bolster its military amid the German threat. The Husqvarna m/40 became the standard Swedish army pistol during and after World War II, remaining in use until the 1980s. It faced criticism for malfunctions in cold weather and for firing overly "hot" ammunition, which wore out the mechanism.

Quantity: Over 83,000 units made it the most widely used version of the Lahti pistol.

Other Countries:
Germany: During the Continuation War, Finland supplied small batches of L-35 pistols to Germany as part of military aid. These were likely used on the Eastern Front, though exact details are scarce.

Civilian Use: After the war, L-35 and m/40 pistols were sold on civilian markets in Finland, Sweden, and the United States. They are now collector’s items, with Finnish L-35s particularly valuable due to their limited production.

Decommissioning: In Finland, the L-35 was fully phased out of active Defence Forces use by the 1990s, while Sweden replaced the m/40 with the Glock 17 in the 1980s.

Collector’s Value: The L-35 is a prized collector’s item, with well-preserved examples fetching hundreds or even thousands of euros. Swedish m/40s are more common and less expensive.

Impact: The Lahti pistol is seen as a symbol of Finnish engineering prowess, and its design influenced later firearms, though it never achieved the mass production of German or American pistols.

Developed by Aimo Lahti, the L-35 was an innovative pistol tailored to Finland’s harsh conditions. Its main variants were the Finnish L-35 and the Swedish m/40, the latter seeing far greater production. In Finland, it served the Defence Forces for half a century, while in Sweden, it was a standard issue for decades. Though limited in production, its durability and reliability left a lasting mark on military firearms history.

Since you don't have one yet, I thought I would attach the pictures of mine.
 

Attachments

  • DSCN0581.jpg
    DSCN0581.jpg
    186.4 KB · Views: 5
  • DSCN0586.jpg
    DSCN0586.jpg
    155.6 KB · Views: 5
  • DSCN0590.jpg
    DSCN0590.jpg
    190.2 KB · Views: 8
  • DSCN0589.jpg
    DSCN0589.jpg
    92.1 KB · Views: 8
FINLAND'S BORDERS
Russia, Norway and Sweden

1. Finland-Russia Border
Surveillance Today (2025)
Strict Border Control: The Finland-Russia border is an EU external border, monitored rigorously by the Finnish Border Guard. The border has been closed to personal traffic since November 2023 due to Russia’s hybrid influence operations, particularly instrumentalized migration.

Closed Border Crossing Points: All land border crossing points (e.g., Vaalimaa, Nuijamaa, Raja-Jooseppi) are currently closed. Applications for international protection cannot be submitted at the land border, with applications centralized to air and sea border crossings.

Technology and Infrastructure: The border employs advanced surveillance technology, including cameras, drones, and motion sensors. The Border Security Act, enacted in 2024, grants authorities additional powers to counter hybrid threats, such as restricting asylum applications in specific border areas.

Authorized Crossing Today
Restricted Access: Personal travel is currently prohibited by a government decision. Exceptions may include diplomatic or humanitarian reasons, handled on a case-by-case basis.

Freight Traffic: Limited freight traffic, exempt from sanctions (e.g., fertilizers), passes through rail connections, primarily via Vainikkala. Road traffic has nearly halted.

Visa Restrictions: Travel restrictions for Russians to Finland, in place since September 2022, have further reduced border crossings.

History (1945–2025)
1945–1991 (Soviet Era): The border was heavily controlled during the Cold War. The Soviet-Finland border was practically closed, with few authorized crossings, mainly through official points like Vaalimaa. Border surveillance was mutual and militarized, and unauthorized crossings were rare but led to severe consequences.

1991–2010: After the Soviet Union’s collapse, border crossings became easier. Shopping tourism from Russia to Finland grew, and crossing points like Nuijamaa and Vaalimaa became busy. Surveillance remained strict, but cooperation with Russia was relatively smooth.

2010–2022: Border traffic increased, with approximately 600,000 passengers crossing via Vainikkala by train in 2019. However, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 drastically changed the situation. Visa restrictions and sanctions reduced traffic, and rail connections ceased.

2023–2025: The border closure in November 2023 was a historic decision prompted by Russia’s orchestration of a wave of asylum seekers. The Border Security Act (2024) and its proposed extension (until 2026) reflect tightened security policies.

2. Finland-Norway Border
Surveillance Today (2025)
Minimal Surveillance: The Finland-Norway border is a Schengen internal border, so there is no regular border control. The Finnish Border Guard and customs conduct random checks, particularly for freight traffic.

Customs Control: Travelers with goods subject to customs duties must pass through a customs point (e.g., Kilpisjärvi, Karigasniemi). Otherwise, the border can be crossed freely anywhere.

Cooperation: Finland and Norway conduct border inspections every 25 years to maintain border markers. The last inspection was in 2000, with the next expected soon.

Authorized Crossing Today
Free Movement: Due to the Schengen Agreement and Nordic passport freedom, the border can be crossed anywhere without checks, provided no goods require customs clearance.

Sámi Rights: The Sámi have historical rights to cross the border for reindeer herding, though these were restricted in the 19th century. Today, movement is unrestricted.

Traffic Volumes: Significant volumes of personal and delivery vehicles cross the border, with traffic increasing sharply after the lifting of COVID restrictions (2022: +120% in personal vehicles).

History (1945–2025)
1945–1952: After World War II, the border was open, but movement was limited due to post-war reconstruction. Sámi border-crossing rights were contentious, as Finland closed the border to reindeer herders in 1852 at Russia’s behest.

1952–1995: Nordic passport freedom (1952) liberalized movement, and crossings became more common. Surveillance was minimal, with border inspections ensuring marker maintenance.

1995–2025: The Schengen Agreement (1995) eliminated remaining border checks. Traffic volumes have grown steadily, driven by tourism and work-related travel. The COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021) introduced temporary restrictions, but these were quickly lifted.


3. Finland-Sweden Border
Surveillance Today (2025)
No Regular Surveillance: Like the Norway border, the Sweden border is a Schengen internal border. The Border Guard and customs perform occasional checks, but crossings are largely unrestricted.

Customs: Travelers with goods subject to duties must contact customs, but the border can be crossed anywhere. Tornio is the busiest crossing point, with a customs office.

Border Inspections: Border markers are checked every 25 years, last in 2006. The border mostly follows the Tornio and Muonio rivers, with the Märket islet’s boundary clarified in the 1980s.

Authorized Crossing Today
Complete Freedom: The border can be crossed anywhere without checks, with daily work and errand trips common, especially in Tornio.

Traffic Volumes: In 2022, vehicle traffic rose by 90% after COVID restrictions were lifted, with growth continuing in 2023 (+25%). Tornio is by far the busiest crossing point.

Cultural Connection: The border region has a strong Nordic identity, with Tornio-Haparanda functioning practically as a single area.

History (1945–2025)
1945–1952: The border was open, but movement was limited in the post-war period. The Tornio River clearly defined the border, with inspections maintaining markers.

1952–1995: Nordic passport freedom facilitated movement, and crossings increased for work and trade. Surveillance was minimal.

1995–2025: The Schengen Agreement fully liberalized movement. The COVID-19 pandemic introduced temporary restrictions (2020–2021), but these were milder than on the Russia border. Traffic has grown steadily, and the border region has become increasingly integrated.


Surveillance
Russia: The strictest surveillance, militarized, and technologically advanced. The border is closed due to hybrid threats.

Norway and Sweden: Minimal surveillance due to the Schengen area. The focus is on customs control and random checks.

Historically: The Russia border was always the most heavily monitored (especially 1945–1991), while Norway and Sweden borders were open even before Schengen.

Authorized Crossing
Russia: Currently nearly impossible for personal travel. Historically, crossings varied from Cold War restrictions to 2000s shopping tourism.

Norway and Sweden: Complete freedom today and for most of the period since 1945. Exceptions include COVID restrictions and 19th-century limits on Sámi rights.

Differences: The Russia border has been politically sensitive and closed for long periods, while Norway and Sweden borders have been open and integrated.

Historical Development
Russia: The border was formalized in the Moscow Armistice (1944) and has been geopolitically sensitive. The Cold War kept it closed, and 2020s hybrid threats have tightened controls further.

Norway: The border was set by the Strömstad Treaty (1751) and has been stable. Sámi rights were the main historical dispute.

Sweden: The border was defined by the Treaty of Hamina (1809) and has been peaceful. The Märket islet boundary was a minor issue resolved diplomatically.

Finland’s borders reflect geopolitical realities: the Russia border has been and remains tightly controlled and politically charged, especially due to hybrid threats. The Norway and Sweden borders, by contrast, are open, with minimal surveillance due to the Schengen area and Nordic cooperation. Historically, the Russia border has seen the most significant changes and restrictions, while the Norway and Sweden borders have remained stable and open, except for minor interruptions like the COVID-19 pandemic. The current situation underscores the Russia border’s closure and tightening security policies, while the Norway and Sweden borders represent Nordic openness.


FIN Border Guard
FIN Customs
 
Last edited:
FINNISH POLICE


Ministry in Charge
The Finnish police operate under the Ministry of the Interior. The Ministry is responsible for directing and overseeing police activities, setting strategic goals, and drafting legislation related to the police. The Ministry’s Police Department handles police administration, crime prevention, public order and safety, licensing services, gambling policy, the private security sector, and international police affairs.

Administration
Police operations are managed by the National Police Board, which operates under the Ministry of the Interior. The National Police Board plans, develops, directs, and supervises police activities and related support functions. It ensures equitable access to police services nationwide and guides police units through performance-based management. The National Police Board is led by the National Police Commissioner. The Board’s main offices are primarily in Helsinki, but it also has a gambling and firearms administration office in Riihimäki and a private security sector supervision office in Mikkeli.

Police Departments
Finland has 11 police departments responsible for local police services. These are:
- Helsinki
- Eastern Uusimaa
- Western Uusimaa
- Häme
- Southeastern Finland
- Eastern Finland
- Central Finland
- Ostrobothnia
- Southwestern Finland
- Oulu
- Lapland

Police departments provide services at main police stations, smaller stations, service points, and joint service points. Their duties include maintaining public order and safety, preventing and investigating crimes, traffic control, and licensing services such as passports and ID cards. In 2022, the number of police officers was approximately 7,500, with the government aiming to increase this to 8,000 full-time equivalents by the end of the parliamentary term.
The Helsinki Police Department stands out, as it also handles national special tasks, such as operating the Bear Readiness Unit (a specialized armed response unit).

National Police Units
There are two national police units:
National Bureau of Investigation (NBI): The NBI investigates international, professional, serious, and organized crime. It coordinates criminal intelligence cooperation between the police, customs, and border guard (known as PTR cooperation) and operates Finland’s only forensic laboratory, which serves all police units and some other authorities. The NBI employs about 670 people, with approximately 40% being women.

Police University College (Polamk): Polamk is responsible for police training and research

Police Training in 2025
Police training is provided by the Police University College (Polamk), located in Tampere. Polamk offers the following programs:
Bachelor’s Degree in Police Studies (UAS): A 3-year program preparing students to become constables. The training includes theoretical studies, practical training, and field placements. In 2025, an estimated 300–400 students are admitted, depending on resource needs.

Master’s Degree in Police Studies (UAS): Designed for experienced officers seeking leadership roles.

Continuing Education: Polamk offers shorter courses, for example, in use of force, criminal investigation, or traffic control.

Polamk also oversees police dog training and police research and development. In 2025, training emphasizes digitalization, such as combating cybercrime, as well as addressing hybrid threats and the evolving security environment. Ethical decision-making and multicultural competence are also highlighted.

The Finnish police operate under the Ministry of the Interior, with the National Police Board providing operational oversight. Local police departments (11 in total) handle daily police tasks, while the National Bureau of Investigation focuses on serious crime, and the Police University College manages training. In 2025, police operations emphasize increasing resources (target of 8,000 officers), leveraging technology, and responding to changes in the security environment. Police training is modern and focuses on diverse skills, including cybercrime prevention and ethical conduct.



DISCONTINUED FINNISH "HIGHWAY PATROL" MOBILE POLICE

History: Establishment and Development
The Mobile Police (Liikkuva poliisi, LP) was a national unit of the Finnish police administration, operating from 1930 to 2013. Its establishment and activities reflected the security needs of the time, particularly the development of traffic control and crime prevention.
Establishment (1930): The Mobile Police was founded on February 19, 1930, as the Mobile Unit of the National Bureau of Investigation. The aim was to enhance crime prevention and traffic control in rural areas, where local police resources were limited. Initially, the unit focused on tracking criminals and monitoring traffic using horses, bicycles, and later cars. Operations were small-scale, with only a few dozen personnel.

1930s–1940s: During World War II, the Mobile Police’s tasks expanded. It supported wartime security needs, such as monitoring evacuation zones and protecting supply transports. Traffic control took a backseat, but crime prevention, including combating smuggling, was a priority.

1950s–1960s: In the post-war period, the Mobile Police became an independent unit, separate from the National Bureau of Investigation, and was officially named the Mobile Police. The growth of car ownership and the development of the road network increased the need for traffic control. The LP began using motorcycles and radio-equipped cars, improving operational efficiency. The focus was on major highways, targeting traffic offenses like drunk driving.

1970s–1980s: The Mobile Police solidified its role as a nationwide unit with stations across Finland, including Vaasa, Oulu, and Kuopio. Technology advanced: radar and breathalyzers were introduced, enhancing speed enforcement and drunk driving checks. The LP also assisted in major accidents and emergencies, such as oil spill responses.

1990s–2000s: Finland’s EU membership (1995) and the Schengen Agreement increased the Mobile Police’s role in cross-border crime prevention, such as combating drug and human trafficking. Traffic control remained the primary task, but the LP took on specialized duties, including heavy vehicle inspections and technical crime investigations (e.g., tachograph tampering). Personnel grew to around 300–350, and the unit was renowned for its traffic policing expertise.

2010–2013: Preparations for the dissolution of the Mobile Police began as part of a police administration reform. The goal was to streamline resources and centralize operations. In 2011, the government decided to disband the unit, with the decision confirmed in 2012. The Mobile Police was officially dissolved on December 31, 2013, with its tasks transferred to local police departments and other national units.

Main Tasks Throughout History
The Mobile Police’s tasks evolved over time, but the core focus areas were:
Traffic Control:
Speed Enforcement: Monitoring speed limits was a key task, especially from the 1950s onward. The LP used radar, laser devices, and automatic cameras.

Drunk Driving Enforcement: The introduction of breathalyzers in the 1970s improved sobriety checks. The LP conducted mass breath tests and targeted raids.

Heavy Vehicle Inspections: From the 1990s, the LP monitored trucks and buses, checking vehicle conditions, driver hours, and load safety.

Promoting Road Safety: The LP participated in campaigns, such as seatbelt enforcement, and educated drivers.

Crime Prevention:
Mobile Crime Investigation: In its early years (1930–1950), the LP tracked criminals, such as thieves and smugglers, in rural areas.

Organized Crime: In the 1990s–2000s, the LP supported efforts against drugs, weapons, and human trafficking, particularly at border crossings.

Technical Crime Investigation: The LP investigated vehicle-related crimes, such as thefts and tachograph manipulations.

Emergency Management:
Major Incidents: The LP assisted in traffic accidents, oil spills, and other crises, coordinating rescue efforts.

National Support: The LP supported local police in large operations, such as monitoring protests or securing state visits.

International Cooperation:
With the Schengen Agreement, the LP engaged in cross-border police cooperation, including joint operations with Estonian and Swedish police.

The LP trained foreign police in traffic control and participated in EU police collaboration.

Reasons for Dissolution and Consequences
The dissolution was part of the PORA III police administration reform, aimed at optimizing resources and eliminating overlaps. The Mobile Police was seen as a separate unit whose tasks could be reassigned to local police departments. The decision faced widespread criticism, as the LP’s traffic control expertise was considered unique. Its personnel (around 300) were mostly reassigned to other police units, but some argued that traffic control standards declined post-dissolution.
After the dissolution, traffic control has been handled by local police departments and automated systems (e.g., speed cameras). Specialized units were established for heavy vehicle inspections, but they have not fully replaced the LP’s nationwide network.
Summary
The Mobile Police was established in 1930 to address rural security needs and evolved into a specialized unit for traffic control and crime prevention. Its main tasks included speed and drunk driving enforcement, heavy vehicle inspections, crime investigation, and emergency management. The LP was disbanded in 2013 for resource efficiency, but its legacy persists in Finnish traffic policing.
 
Last edited:
Go-Px6ke-XIAAi-C7b.jpg


Estonian authorities detain Russian 'shadow fleet'-linked oil tanker near Tallinn | Euronews
 
Fun fact about Finland: one of my favorite sports is extremely popular there. Disc golf. There are more disc golf courses in Finland than there are regular golf courses. Niklas Anttila, a Finnish disc golfer, has won the last 2 major tournaments on the Disc Golf Pro Tour. The Aland Islands, an autonomous region of Finland, is known as the disc golf capitol of the world. They have some of the best and most beautiful courses in the world.
 
Fun fact about Finland: one of my favorite sports is extremely popular there. Disc golf. There are more disc golf courses in Finland than there are regular golf courses. Niklas Anttila, a Finnish disc golfer, has won the last 2 major tournaments on the Disc Golf Pro Tour. The Aland Islands, an autonomous region of Finland, is known as the disc golf capitol of the world. They have some of the best and most beautiful courses in the world.

Thank you.
I didn't know that Finland is a big country for Frisbee golf, new information for me. That's why it's worth participating in the S&W forum, you learn something new every day

My workplace also has its own disc golf course.
I myself have tried the sport sometime a long time ago.
Sometimes there has been talk that we would go and try it with a work group.



Disc Golf in Finland
Disc golf is a rapidly growing sport in Finland, emerging as one of the country’s most popular outdoor activities. Its appeal lies in its low entry barrier, affordability, and widespread availability. The sport attracts people of all ages, enjoyed both as casual recreation and competitive sport. The COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021) significantly boosted its popularity, as outdoor activities gained prominence.

Number of Participants
Estimates suggest around one million Finns are interested in disc golf, including both adults and youth. Among adults, approximately 700,000 express moderate to high interest in the sport. The Finnish Disc Golf Association (SFL) has seen substantial growth in registered members:
2009: 692 members
2021: 10,188 members
2023: 11,869 members (10,737 individual members)

However, most players are not affiliated with clubs, so the actual number of active players is likely much higher. According to the LIITU study (2022), disc golf ranks as the third most popular recreational activity among boys aged 11–15 and the 15th among girls in Finland.

Number of Courses
Finland has more disc golf courses per capita than any other country. As of 2023, there are over 1,000 courses, compared to just 50 in 2000—a 60-fold increase. Courses are available in nearly every municipality; in 2021, only three municipalities lacked one. Courses vary in difficulty:
Class A (competition-grade, ≥18 holes): over 120 courses
Class B (recreational, 9–17 holes): over 130 courses
Class C and D (beginner and school courses): hundreds of smaller courses
Most courses are free to play, enhancing accessibility. Notable courses like Heinola’s Kippasuo and Kuopio’s Puijo are considered world-class, and Tampere and Nokia will host the 2025 World Championships.

Comparison with the Rest of Europe
Finland is a disc golf powerhouse in Europe by several metrics:
Number of Courses: Finland’s 1,000+ courses (2023) far exceed Sweden’s ~200, Estonia’s and Norway’s ~100 each, and other European countries (e.g., Germany, Denmark), which typically have fewer than 100 per country. Europe as a whole has around 1,500–2,000 courses, with Finland accounting for a significant share.

Number of Players: Finland hosts about half of Europe’s licensed players (per PDGA data). In 2018, Finland had ~650 courses and 50,000 licensed players, compared to ~10,000–20,000 active players in countries like Sweden and Estonia.

Rounds Played: According to UDisc, Finland recorded 1.2 million registered rounds in 2023, second only to the U.S. (11.5 million). Per capita, Finland (222 rounds/1,000 people) and *land lead globally. Sweden (1.1 million rounds) is also active but trails Finland’s per-capita engagement.

Competitive Success: Finland dominates European disc golf. In 2016, Finns won nearly half of the European Championship medals, and players like Väinö Mäkelä and Seppo Paju are world-class. Other countries, like Estonia (Kristin Tattar) and Sweden, have notable individuals, but Finland’s depth and volume of talent stand out.

Why Finland Excels
Finland’s success stems from several factors:
Infrastructure: Courses are affordable to build (~*20,000 for a competition course), and municipalities have supported development.

Culture: Disc golf aligns with Finland’s outdoor and community-oriented lifestyle, spreading through social networks.

Marketing and Media: Top Finnish players like Mäkelä boost visibility on platforms like YouTube. Events like the European Open in Nokia draw global attention.

Pandemic Effect: COVID-19 attracted new players, especially youth and families, with disc sales surging (over one million discs sold in 2021).

Challenges and Future
Despite Finland’s lead, courses can be crowded, and developing elite-level facilities requires investment. Disc golf is growing elsewhere in Europe, particularly in Estonia and the Nordics, increasing competition. However, in Finland, the sport’s eco-friendliness, affordability, and versatility ensure continued growth.
Summary
Finland is Europe’s disc golf leader: over 1,000 courses, ~1 million interested individuals, and strong competitive success set it apart. Sweden and Estonia follow, but Finland’s per-capita course and player numbers are unmatched. The sport is firmly embedded in Finnish culture, with a bright future ahead.
 
The Aland Islands, an autonomous region of Finland, is known as the disc golf capitol of the world. They have some of the best and most beautiful courses in the world.

NOTE THIS IS NOT POLITICS - THIS IS A JOKE
Could the US President announce that Aland will become the 51st state?

Aland is an island group belonging to Finland, an autonomous province between Finland and Sweden. 99.99% of people there speak Swedish.
There is a Russian consulate on the island, which oversees the demilitarization of the islands.
Finnish soldiers are not allowed to enter the province's territory, only the Police, Border Guard and Customs are allowed to carry firearms there.
However, the Finnish Defence Forces have a duty to defend the province in times of emergency and war, but they are not allowed to practice there.

Aland archipelago would be a good place for a NATO naval base.


Aland’s Military Use from the Swedish Era to the End of the Continuation War

Swedish Era (before 1809)
Aland was part of the Swedish Kingdom from the 13th century until 1809, and its strategic location in the Baltic Sea made it militarily significant. Kastelholm Castle was a key stronghold used for regional control and defense. Sweden frequently clashed with Russia, and Aland was involved in conflicts, such as during the Great Northern War (1700–1721), when Russian forces briefly occupied the islands. The Swedish navy used Aland as a base to control the Baltic, but the islands were vulnerable to attacks. In 1808, during the Finnish War, Russia swiftly captured Aland using the frozen sea, exposing the weaknesses of its defenses.

Russian Era (1809–1917)
In the Treaty of Fredrikshamn (1809), Aland, along with Finland, was ceded to Russia as part of the Grand Duchy of Finland. Russia recognized the islands’ strategic value and began constructing the Bomarsund fortress in the 1830s to control the Baltic and protect its interests. During the Crimean War (1853–1856), British and French forces destroyed the unfinished Bomarsund in 1854. As a result, the Treaty of Paris (1856) demilitarized Aland for the first time, prohibiting fortifications and military presence. However, Russia re-fortified the islands during World War I (1914–1918), violating the agreement, due to fears of a German invasion in the Baltic.
Independence and Civil War (1917–1918)
When Finland gained independence in 1917, Aland’s status became contentious. Many Alanders, identifying as Swedish-speaking, sought to join Sweden, supported by Swedish nationalists. During Finland’s Civil War in 1918, Aland was chaotic: Russian troops remained, and Red and White Guards clashed. Sweden sent troops under the pretext of “protecting civilians,” but likely aimed to annex the islands. German forces landed at the Whites’ request, prompting Sweden’s withdrawal. In 1919, fortifications were dismantled under an agreement between Finland, Sweden, and Germany. In 1921, the League of Nations settled the dispute, granting Aland to Finland with autonomy and reinforcing its demilitarized status in the Geneva Convention (1921), which banned military presence and declared the islands neutral.

Winter War and Interim Peace (1939–1941)
At the start of the Winter War in 1939, Finland fortified Aland to prevent a Soviet invasion, breaching the demilitarization agreement. The Moscow Peace Treaty (1940) did not mention Aland, but the Soviet Union demanded a separate agreement. The Moscow Aland Agreement, signed in October 1940, required Finland to dismantle fortifications and reaffirmed demilitarization. It allowed the Soviet Union to establish a consulate in Mariehamn to monitor the islands’ non-military status but did not acknowledge their neutrality, unlike the 1921 agreement. Finnish troops withdrew from Aland in July 1940, and demilitarization was formalized in February 1941.

Continuation War (1941–1944)
Fearing a Soviet occupation at the start of the Continuation War, Finland deployed troops and warships to Aland on June 22, 1941, in an operation called “Kilpapurjehdus” (Regatta). The islands were re-fortified, and the air force patrolled for submarines. Aland remained relatively calm but strategically vital during the war. In 1944, as Finland sought peace, Germany planned to seize Aland to prevent Finland’s withdrawal from the war, while Sweden deployed naval units nearby. Neither plan materialized. After the Continuation War ended in September 1944, Finland dismantled fortifications, and the Paris Peace Treaty (1947) confirmed Aland’s demilitarization “in accordance with the current situation,” referring to the 1940 agreement.

Demilitarization and Soviet/Russian Oversight
Evolution of Demilitarization
Aland’s demilitarization began in 1856, was reinforced in 1921, and clarified in 1940 and 1947. The 1921 Geneva Convention (signed by Finland, Sweden, Britain, France, etc.) banned military presence and fortifications and declared Aland neutral. The 1940 Moscow Agreement (Finland and the Soviet Union) focused on non-militarization but omitted neutrality, giving the Soviets interpretive leeway. The 1947 Paris Treaty cemented demilitarization as part of international law, but its vague phrasing (“current situation”) left room for disputes.
Soviet Oversight (1940–1991)
Under the 1940 Moscow Agreement, the Soviet Union established a consulate in Mariehamn to monitor demilitarization. Initially staffed with dozens of personnel, including intelligence officers, the consulate served as a tool to limit Finland’s sovereignty. For instance, in the 1980s, it reported a Finnish warship’s movements in the area. The oversight was both technical and a display of power, ensuring Aland remained a military vacuum, which suited Soviet interests in the Baltic.

Russian Role (1991–present)
After the Soviet Union’s collapse, the 1940 agreement’s obligations passed to Russia. The Russian consulate in Mariehamn continues to monitor demilitarization, though its role has diminished, with only a single consul currently stationed. Oversight is largely formal, but the consulate’s presence is seen as sensitive, as it gives Russia a foothold on Finnish soil. The agreement allows the consul to report violations to Finnish authorities, triggering a joint Finnish-Russian investigation.
Finnish Public Sentiment on Demilitarization and the Russian Consulate

Historical Context
Aland’s demilitarization has been debated, especially for security reasons. After the Soviet collapse in the 1990s, Finland lifted many Paris Peace Treaty restrictions (e.g., arms limitations), but Aland’s demilitarization remained, partly due to strong opposition from Aland’s regional government and a lack of political consensus. Demilitarization and neutrality are central to Alanders’ identity, distinguishing them from mainland Finland.


Current Sentiment in Finland: Finnish opinions on ending demilitarization are divided:

Supporters: Some Finns, particularly security experts and conservative groups, view demilitarization as outdated and a security risk, as it hinders defense preparations in a strategically vital area. The Russian consulate is seen as a relic of “Finlandization,” and its closure is demanded as a symbol of sovereignty. In 2023, President Niinistö commissioned a study on the consulate’s legal status. reflecting growing debate. Some politicians have called for ending demilitarization and closing the consulate, citing Russia’s aggression in Ukraine and the Baltic’s altered security landscape.

Opponents: Many Alanders and some mainland Finns, including figures like Alexander Stubb, see demilitarization as a strength that stabilizes the Baltic and protects Aland from conflicts. They fear that ending it could provoke Russia and make the islands a military target. A 2023 Foreign Ministry report concluded that dismantling demilitarization would be legally complex, as it is embedded in international customary law and multiple treaties.

General Opinion: Polls on the issue are scarce, but a 2006 Alandstidningen survey showed little support among Alanders for independence or ending demilitarization. In mainland Finland, closing the Russian consulate garners more support than ending demilitarization, as the latter is seen as legally and politically complex.


Ending demilitarization would require broad international consensus, as it is tied to multiple treaties (1856, 1921, 1940, 1947). Russia would likely oppose it, as a demilitarized Aland serves its strategic interests by preventing NATO or Finnish fortifications. Closing the consulate would be easier but could strain Finland-Russia relations. Finland’s NATO membership (2023) has reduced the urgency of ending demilitarization, as an attack on Aland would be treated as an attack on NATO, but the debate persists due to challenges in defending the islands without pre-fortification.

Aland on the map​
AM1.png

AM2.png

AM3.png
 
Last edited:
My workplace also has its own disc golf course.
I myself have tried the sport sometime a long time ago.
Sometimes there has been talk that we would go and try it with a work group.

I highly recommend it. I've seen 7-70 year olds playing the sport. To varying degrees of course.:D
Like regular golf, there are courses for all levels of players. What some of the pros can do with a disc is amazing. What I can do with the disc is much less amazing. But it's still fun. It is just a mobile frisbee game in the park. What's more relaxing than a walk in the park?
 
This is how the night-time oil tanker seizure went
Estonian Border Guard Chief Veiko Kommusaar


658.avif

2e566bbcfe175985ba55d659074f52fb.svg

658.avif


Early Friday morning, the Estonian Navy seized the oil tanker Kiwala, which was en route to the port of Laukaansuu, or Ust-Luga, in Russia. The Estonian Police and Border Guard's special unit assisted the Navy in the exceptional operation.

"The Navy requested assistance when a vessel was moving in Estonian territorial waters in the Gulf of Finland, the flag of which has not been determined and on which the EU and many other countries have imposed sanctions," said Estonian Border Guard Chief Veiko Kommusaar.

The operation began at 3 a.m., and at 4:19 a.m. the vessel moved into territorial waters at the "invitation" of the Estonian authorities.

The captain agreed to steer the Kiwala into Estonian territorial waters and further to an anchorage near the island of Aegna after "some messages had been exchanged," says Kommusaar.

The ship was escorted to Estonian territorial waters by naval vessels, as well as a police and border guard helicopter. The operation was complicated by a snowstorm and the risk of the helicopter freezing. The special forces boarded the tanker from a pilot boat.


Kiwala on the map
AM2.png

Y"ollinen operaatio It"amerell"a: Viron rajavartiosto otti haltuunsa Ven"aj"an varjolaivastoon kuuluvan tankkerin | HS.fi


I am really proud of our "little brother" Estonia.
Estonia is much BIGGER than its actual size. Estonia has developed economically and politically during its little over 30 years of independence.
Estonia is a strong ally, it has made sacrifices, for example in Afghanistan, to achieve the common goals of the alliance.
Finland was also involved in Afghanistan, but we were not yet a NATO member at that time, so we were not as full-fledged as Estonia.
Estonians are ready to fight for their country if Russia threatens them.

Over the past month, Estonia has:
1) Banned russians from voting
2) Deported a russian
3) Passed a law against the influence of the Russian Orthodox Church
4) And the cherry on top — arrested a russian shadow fleet tanker.


GoR3SqzXkAATVT8
 
Last edited:
Finnish-Estonian defense cooperation

Finland and Estonia have always cooperated in defense since the countries were independent.
There have been volunteer soldiers fighting against Russia on both sides.
When Estonia became independent, Finland supported Estonia by donating weapons, ships, armored vehicles and other defense equipment.
Finland trained Estonian officers.
As far as I know, the commander of the Estonian Defense Forces completed his officer training in Finland.


Finland’s and Estonia’s Obuhov Guns During World War II and How They Blocked the Gulf of Finland from the Russians

Obuhov Guns and Their Background
Obuhov guns were Russian 12-inch (305 mm) coastal artillery pieces developed at the Obuhov factory in St. Petersburg. They were among the heaviest coastal guns of their time, with a range of up to 42–43 kilometers, making them critical for controlling maritime areas. During World War I, Russia deployed these guns as part of the Peter the Great Sea Fortress, including on the coasts of Finland and Estonia. After Finland’s independence in 1917 and Estonia’s in 1918, the Russians left behind significant equipment, including Obuhov guns, which both countries later utilized.
Locations in Finland and Estonia During World War II

Finland:
In Finland, Obuhov guns were installed in two key locations in the 1930s, using guns salvaged from the Russian Ino fortress (on the Karelian Isthmus):
Kuivasaari (off Helsinki): A twin-gun turret was installed in 1935. This was strategically vital, as it protected Helsinki and supported the Gulf of Finland blockade from the west.

Mäkiluoto (off Porkkalanniemi): Another twin-gun turret, crucial for blocking the narrowest part of the Gulf of Finland (Porkkala–Naissaar). Mäkiluoto’s location was ideal, as it sat at the Gulf’s bottleneck.
These guns’ range covered much of the Gulf of Finland, enabling crossfire with other artillery positions.

Estonia:
In Estonia, Obuhov guns were present until the Soviet occupation in 1940, after which they were taken over by the Red Fleet. Key locations included:
Naissaar (off Tallinn): Naissaar had two 12-inch twin-gun turrets, built during the Russian Empire. They were central to the Gulf of Finland blockade’s eastern side.

Aegna (also near Tallinn): Aegna’s guns were world-class heavy artillery, supporting Naissaar’s defenses.
In 1940, the Soviet Union seized these guns, and they were partly used during the Continuation War against Finnish and German forces.

The Gulf of Finland Artillery Blockade and Its Mechanism
The secret artillery blockade developed by Finland and Estonia in the 1930s was a strategic defense system aimed at preventing the Soviet Baltic Fleet from moving from the eastern Gulf of Finland to the west. The blockade relied on the following elements:
Heavy Coastal Artillery: The Obuhov guns’ long range (up to 43 km) enabled crossfire across the Gulf’s narrowest point (Mäkiluoto–Naissaar, ~36 km). This meant enemy ships could not pass without heavy losses.

Fire Control Cooperation: Finland and Estonia developed joint fire control stations and an underwater cable across the Gulf, allowing precise coordination. Finns could direct Estonian guns and vice versa, extending the firing range beyond the horizon.

Sea Mines: The guns were supported by thousands of mines planned for deployment between Mäkiluoto and Naissaar. Mines forced enemy ships into narrower channels, making them vulnerable to artillery fire.

Submarines and Armored Ships: Finnish and Estonian submarines (e.g., Finland’s Vetehinen-class and Estonia’s Lembit) and Finland’s armored ships (Ilmarinen and Väinämöinen, with 10-inch guns) complemented the blockade, targeting ships that survived artillery and mines.

In 1939, the system included 29 heavy and 16 medium coastal guns, theoretically capable of firing a thousand shells in 5–6 minutes at a fleet crossing the Gulf.

Impact of World War II on the Blockade
Winter War (1939–1940): The blockade was not implemented, as Estonia surrendered to the Soviet Union in October 1939 without a fight, and its guns fell to the Red Fleet. Finland fortified its own positions (e.g., Kuivasaari and Mäkiluoto), but alone, the blockade was unfeasible. During the Winter War, Obuhov guns saw little active use, as fighting focused on land.

Continuation War (1941–1944):
At the start of the Continuation War, Finland and Germany aimed to implement a similar blockade, as Estonia remained under Soviet control. Finnish Obuhov guns at Mäkiluoto and Kuivasaari were actively used:
Kuivasaari: The turret fired once in December 1941 against a Soviet vessel evacuating troops from Hanko, but its primary role was deterrence.

Mäkiluoto: The turret supported Gulf of Finland minefields and prevented Soviet naval movements westward.
In 1943–1944, Finland and Germany installed an anti-submarine net between Mäkiluoto and the Estonian coast, significantly strengthening the blockade. This net, combined with mines and artillery, effectively blocked Soviet surface ships from reaching the Baltic Sea. Soviet submarines occasionally slipped through, but their impact was minimal.

Success of the Blockade:
Although the original Finnish-Estonian blockade failed due to Estonia’s occupation, Finland and Germany successfully blocked the Gulf of Finland from the Soviet fleet during the Continuation War. The Obuhov guns’ deterrence, minefields, and submarine nets prevented major landings on Finland’s and Estonia’s western coasts and secured German and Finnish maritime supply lines. For example, in 1941, Soviet forces retreating from Tallinn suffered heavy losses due to Gulf minefields, with around 80,000 Soviet personnel killed in mine-struck ships—the second-deadliest naval battle of World War II

Why the Blockade Mattered
Blocking the Gulf of Finland prevented the Soviet Baltic Fleet from reaching *land, Saaremaa, and Hiiumaa, which could have led to a two-front war against Finland and Estonia. It also secured Finland’s and Estonia’s sea routes to the West, preventing a trade blockade and enabling potential military aid. Sweden indirectly supported the plan, as the blockade bolstered its own maritime defense.

Challenges and Limitations
Estonia’s occupation in 1940 derailed the original plan, leaving Finland to maintain the guns alone.

Obuhov guns were technically impressive but slow to operate (loading and fire control took time), limiting their effectiveness against fast-moving targets.

Soviet air raids and submarines posed a threat, though the gun positions were well-protected.
 
Estonia’s Independence, Finland’s Role in Establishing and Training the Estonian Defense Forces and Kaitseliit, and the Most Significant Equipment Donations​

Estonia’s Independence (1918–1920)
Estonia’s path to independence began with the collapse of the Russian Empire in 1917. In February 1918, Estonia declared independence, but German forces soon occupied the country. After Germany’s defeat in World War I in November 1918, Estonia seized a new opportunity for sovereignty. However, Soviet Russia invaded late that year, sparking the Estonian War of Independence (1918–1920). Estonia fought against Bolsheviks, and the withdrawal of German troops left behind pro-German factions, such as supporters of the Baltic Duchy, complicating the situation. The war ended in Estonia’s victory, and the Treaty of Tartu (February 2, 1920) confirmed its independence.
Estonia established a provisional government in 1917, with Konstantin Päts as its first prime minister. After the independence declaration (February 24, 1918), Estonia began building its defense forces, but resources were scarce. Finland’s support was critical, as it had recently undergone its own independence process and civil war in 1918, giving it experience and a willingness to aid Estonia.
Finland’s Role in Establishing Estonia’s Defense Forces
Finland supported Estonia in numerous ways during and after the War of Independence, particularly in establishing the Estonian Defense Forces (Eesti Kaitsevägi) and Kaitseliit (Estonia’s voluntary defense organization, analogous to Finland’s Civil Guard). Finland’s assistance was both material and educational, as well as logistical.

Volunteers and Military Support in the War of Independence
Finnish Volunteers: Approximately 3,500–4,000 Finnish volunteers fought in Estonia’s War of Independence, forming units like the Pohjan Pojat (Sons of the North) and others. Led by Colonel Martin Wetzer, they participated in key battles, such as those at Narva and the Paju-Tartu line in 1919. The Finns brought experience from Finland’s Civil War, particularly the tactics of the White forces.

Tactical Expertise: Finns taught Estonians guerrilla tactics, fortification techniques, and small-unit combat, which had proven effective in Finland’s Civil War. This was vital, as Estonia’s army initially consisted of poorly organized volunteers with little training.

Organizing the Defense Forces
Estonia’s Defense Forces were formally established in 1918, but their development began in earnest after the war. Finland assisted in creating officer training programs and military structures. Finnish officers, such as Colonel Hans Kalm, served as advisors and trainers.

Estonia’s first military commander, General Johan Laidoner, drew on Finland’s experience with the Civil Guard model and officer education. Though trained in Russia, Laidoner valued Finland’s practical approach.

Establishing and Training Kaitseliit
Kaitseliit was founded in 1918, modeled on Finland’s Civil Guard, which had proven its worth in Finland’s Civil War. Finnish Civil Guard activists, such as Vihtori Kosola and Lauri Pihkala, visited Estonia to share knowledge on organization, training, and operations.

Kaitseliit’s training emphasized volunteers’ military readiness, rifle marksmanship, and patriotic spirit. Finns helped develop training programs and organize local units, especially in rural areas.

Kaitseliit also took on a societal role, such as fostering patriotic education among youth, drawing inspiration from Finland. For example, Estonia’s youth military training (Noored Kotkad) was influenced by Finland’s youth Civil Guard programs.

Most Significant Equipment Donations
Finland donated and supplied significant military equipment to Estonia during and after the War of Independence. These donations were critical, as Estonia lacked its own arms industry, and its stockpiles consisted mainly of outdated Russian and German equipment.
Rifles and Light Weapons
Finland donated thousands of rifles, primarily Russian Mosin-Nagant M1891 models, left over from Finland’s Civil War. Estimates suggest 10,000–20,000 rifles were provided in 1918–1919.

Additionally, Finland supplied machine guns, such as the Maxim M/09-21, which were effective in defensive positions.

Artillery
Finland donated several field guns, particularly Russian 76 mm and 122 mm howitzers, sourced from Russian army stockpiles. Dozens of these guns formed the backbone of Estonia’s artillery.

For coastal defense, Finland provided smaller 75 mm and 120 mm guns, which supported the protection of Estonian ports like Tallinn and Paldiski.

Naval Equipment
Finland aided Estonia’s navy by donating smaller vessels, such as patrol boats and minesweepers, sourced from abandoned Russian Baltic Fleet stocks. In 1919, Finland transferred at least two smaller vessels, which were renamed in Estonian service.

Finland also trained Estonian naval personnel, particularly in minesweeping and coastal defense.

Other Supplies
Finland provided uniforms, backpacks, field telephones, and other logistical equipment essential for outfitting Estonia’s army. For instance, surplus Civil Guard gear, such as boots and tents, was sent to Estonia.

Hundreds of thousands of rounds of ammunition (for rifles, machine guns, and artillery) were delivered, crucial as the war dragged on.

Impact of Equipment Donations
War of Independence: Donated rifles and artillery enabled Estonia to equip its forces and rapidly develop combat capability. Without Finland’s aid, Estonia would have been more vulnerable to Bolshevik attacks.

Long-Term Impact: The donations laid the foundation for Estonia’s Defense Forces and Kaitseliit, which maintained independence until the Soviet occupation in 1940. Artillery and naval vessels, for example, were used in the 1930s to protect Estonia’s fortifications and ports.

Cultural Bond: Equipment donations and training strengthened solidarity between Finland and Estonia, evident in later collaborations, such as planning the Gulf of Finland artillery blockade.

Challenges and Limitations
Finland’s own resources were limited after its Civil War, so donations did not always meet Estonia’s needs in quantity.

Some equipment, particularly Russian artillery, was outdated and required maintenance or modernization.

Logistical challenges, such as transporting supplies across the sea, occasionally delayed aid, especially during the war’s most intense phases.

Estonia’s Re-independence in the 1990s

Estonia restored its independence on August 20, 1991, amid the Soviet Union’s collapse. The process began in the late 1980s, enabled by Mikhail Gorbachev’s perestroika and glasnost, which gave rise to a national awakening. The Singing Revolution (1987–1991), marked by massive song festivals and human chains, united Estonians in their demand for independence. The failed Moscow coup in August 1991 weakened Soviet central authority, prompting Estonia’s Supreme Council to declare the restoration of independence. Finland swiftly recognized Estonia’s independence on August 25, 1991, and diplomatic relations were re-established. Soviet troops fully withdrew from Estonia by 1994.

Finland’s Role in Establishing and Training the Estonian Defence Forces and Kaitseliit

Estonian Defence Forces:
At the time of independence, Estonia’s Defence Forces (Eesti Kaitsevägi) were virtually non-existent, as the Soviet military had controlled the region. Finland played a significant role in their reconstruction during the 1990s, though official support was initially cautious due to concerns about Russia’s reaction.
1992–1994: Approximately 90 retired Finnish officers and reservists voluntarily assisted in developing Estonia’s Defence Forces at their own expense. They helped with training and organizational setup, drawing on Finland’s conscription model.

1996 onward: Official cooperation began when Estonia’s Defence Forces commander, Johannes Kert, requested Finland’s assistance. Lieutenant General Pentti Lehtimäki coordinated the project, focusing on training. From 1996 to 2003, around 450 Estonian soldiers were trained in Finland, including 21 officers (e.g., Tarmo Kõuts and Johannes Kert) who attended specialized courses. Estonian conscripts also trained at Finland’s Reserve Officer School.

Training emphasized Finland’s model of independent, small, and mobile units, contrasting with the Soviet army’s massive structure. Estonian officers like Andrus Merilo and Ilmar Tamm studied in Finland, bringing Finnish expertise to Estonia’s system and strengthening military cooperation.

Kaitseliit:
Kaitseliit, Estonia’s voluntary defense organization, was re-established in 1990, continuing its 1918 legacy after being disbanded by the Soviets in 1940.
Finland indirectly influenced Kaitseliit’s development, as its original 1930s model was inspired by Finland’s Civil Guard (Suojeluskunta). In the 1990s, Finnish reservists contributed to training, particularly in tactics and leadership.

Kaitseliit was integrated into the Defence Forces in April 1992, and its training drew on Finnish experience. However, Finland lacked a direct equivalent to Kaitseliit, so the U.S. Maryland National Guard provided the most significant support for its development.

Finnish assistance focused on marksmanship training, leveraging Kaitseliit’s historical network of shooting ranges, which was the densest in the world in the 1930s, to revive this tradition.

Most Significant Equipment Donations
Finland donated relatively modest amounts of materiel compared to countries like the U.S. or Germany, but these contributions were vital for Estonia’s early defense capabilities:
Field Artillery: 19 lightweight 105 mm field guns with ammunition, forming the backbone of two artillery batteries.

Mortars: 54 mortars, enhancing infantry fire support.

Anti-Aircraft Guns: 100 23 mm anti-aircraft guns, critical for early air defense.

Other Equipment: Fire control and communication gear, engineering tools, training equipment, barracks furnishings, kitchen supplies, and air force materiel such as radio equipment and flight gear.

These donations were highly valued, as Estonia’s Defence Forces had almost no heavy equipment in 1991, and Soviet-era materiel was often disorganized or obsolete. The donations provided a foundation for basic capabilities, though Estonia later required modern equipment to meet NATO standards.


Estonia regained independence in August 1991 through the Singing Revolution and the Soviet Union’s collapse. Finland cautiously but significantly supported the development of Estonia’s Defence Forces and Kaitseliit, primarily through training: 450 Estonians were trained in Finland from 1996 to 2003, and Finnish officers and reservists shared expertise starting in 1992. Kaitseliit’s development partly drew on Finland’s model, though the U.S. was its main supporter. Key equipment donations included 19 field guns, 54 mortars, and 100 anti-aircraft guns, laying the groundwork for Estonia’s defense capabilities. Finland’s assistance was crucial in the early stages of Estonia’s military rebuilding, even if much of it occurred behind the scenes.
 
The Capture of Helsinki on April 12, 1918, and Its Significance for Finnish Independence

Background and Events
The capture of Helsinki on April 12, 1918, was a pivotal moment in Finland’s War of Independence, when Finnish Government forces, supported by German allies, defeated the Red Bolsheviks and Russian Bolshevik troops in the capital. The Red Bolshevik rebellion, which began in January 1918, was an illegal attempt to seize governmental power, heavily backed by Russian Bolshevik troops that had occupied Finland as a legacy of the former Russian Empire. Helsinki was the stronghold of the Red Bolsheviks, and its capture was strategically crucial to suppressing the rebellion.
The operation involved Finnish Government forces, particularly Jägers and other trained units, led by General C.G.E. Mannerheim. German allies, approximately 9,000 troops of the Baltic Sea Division under General Rüdiger von der Goltz, landed in Hanko on April 3 and advanced to Helsinki. The Russian Bolshevik troops, numbering around 1,500–2,000 in Helsinki, supported the Red Bolsheviks with arms and training but showed weak fighting spirit, with many fleeing or surrendering. During the battles of April 11–12, Finnish Government forces and German allies seized key locations, such as the Workers’ Hall and the Railway Station. The Red Bolsheviks and Russian Bolshevik troops were defeated, and Helsinki was liberated by April 13.

The operation involved Finnish Government forces, particularly Jägers and other trained units, led by General C.G.E. Mannerheim. German allies, approximately 9,000 troops of the Baltic Sea Division under General Rüdiger von der Goltz, landed in Hanko on April 3 and advanced to Helsinki. The Russian Bolshevik troops, numbering around 1,500–2,000 in Helsinki, supported the Red Bolsheviks with arms and training but showed weak fighting spirit, with many fleeing or surrendering. During the battles of April 11–12, Finnish Government forces and German allies seized key locations, such as the Workers’ Hall and the Railway Station. The Red Bolsheviks and Russian Bolshevik troops were defeated, and Helsinki was liberated by April 13.

Significance for Finnish Independence
The capture of Helsinki was a decisive step in securing Finland’s independence. Finland had declared independence on December 6, 1917, but Russian Bolshevik troops disregarded this, supporting the Red Bolsheviks in their coup attempt, threatening the sovereignty of the young state. The liberation of the capital dismantled the Bolsheviks’ administrative center and restored the legitimate government’s authority in a key region. It demonstrated Finland’s ability to defend its independence against a foreign occupier and its supported rebels, strengthening national unity and self-determination.

Defeat of Russian Bolshevik Troops
In the capture of Helsinki, the Russian Bolshevik troops, acting as an occupying force and backbone of the Red Bolsheviks, were defeated in the capital. These troops had played a significant role in the rebellion’s early stages, supplying the Red Bolsheviks with weapons, ammunition, and military training. For instance, Russian naval vessels, such as the armored ship Slava, supported the Red Bolsheviks in Helsinki before the capture. The defeat of the Russian Bolshevik troops in Helsinki was symbolically and strategically vital: it severed the Red Bolsheviks’ external support and proved Finland’s capacity to liberate its territory from foreign occupation. Many Russian Bolsheviks fled eastward or were captured, and their influence on the rebellion collapsed, triggering a domino effect starting in Helsinki.

Defeat of the Red Bolsheviks
The Red Bolsheviks, who had illegally risen against the government in January 1918, held Helsinki as their fortress. Inspired by the Russian Bolshevik revolution, they aimed to establish a socialist dictatorship in Finland. The capture of Helsinki crushed their military and political core. Red Bolshevik leaders, such as Kullervo Manner and Eero Haapalainen, lost their grip, with many forced to flee or surrender. After the capture, thousands of Red Bolsheviks were imprisoned (e.g., at Suomenlinna prisoner camp), and the rebellion began to crumble elsewhere in southern Finland, culminating in the captures of Tampere and Vyborg in April–May 1918.

Broader Implications
The capture of Helsinki not only returned the capital to the Finnish Government forces but also solidified the alliance with Germany, which was critical to victory in the War of Independence. The support of German allies was invaluable, though their role later sparked debate in Finnish domestic politics (e.g., monarchist plans). The capture exposed the vulnerability of the Red Bolsheviks and Russian Bolshevik troops’ alliance, ensuring Finland did not descend into Bolshevik-controlled chaos like Russia. It laid the foundation for an independent Finland capable of building a democratic system free from the threat of foreign occupiers or rebels.

Summary
The capture of Helsinki on April 12, 1918, was a cornerstone of Finland’s War of Independence, where Finnish Government forces and German allies defeated the Red Bolsheviks and Russian Bolshevik troops in the capital. It secured Finland’s independence, crushed the illegal Bolshevik rebellion, and eliminated the threat of Russian occupying forces in Helsinki, paving the way for the rebellion’s end. The capture symbolized Finland’s resolve to defend its freedom and legitimate government against foreign invaders and their supported rebels.



Finland and Germany’s Cooperation and Alliance in the First and Second World Wars

First World War and War of Independence (1914–1918)
During the First World War, Finland was still part of the Russian Empire, but Germany’s support was crucial for its independence. From 1915, Germany trained about 2,000 Finnish Jägers (Jäger Movement) to fight against Russia. After Finland declared independence in 1917, Russian Bolshevik-backed Red Bolsheviks launched a rebellion in 1918. Germany’s Baltic Sea Division (around 9,000 men) arrived in spring 1918 to aid the Finnish Government, helping defeat the Red Bolsheviks and Russian Bolshevik troops in cities like Helsinki and Tampere. Germany’s aid was a salvation from Russian domination and Bolshevik chaos, but Finland did not endorse Germany’s imperialist goals, focusing solely on securing its independence. The Jägers’ expertise and German support strengthened the young nation’s army, though Finland’s role remained pragmatic, not ideological.

Second World War (1939–1945)
In the Second World War, Finland allied with Germany to counter the Bolshevik Soviet Union’s aggression. In the Winter War (1939–1940), Finland fought alone, but in the Continuation War (1941–1944), Germany supplied weapons, resources, and troops (e.g., 200,000 soldiers in Lapland) to support Finland against the Soviets. Cooperation was closest in 1941–1943, as Finland aimed to reclaim territories lost in the Winter War. German aid, such as anti-tank weapons and artillery, was vital in repelling Bolshevik Soviet assaults, particularly on the Karelian Isthmus and East Karelia. The Lapland War (1944–1945) ended the alliance, as Finland, under Soviet pressure, expelled German forces from the north.

Finland’s Role and Nazi Ideology
Finland did not support Germany’s Nazi ideology or participate in its ideological aims, such as the Holocaust or racial policies. Cooperation was purely strategic, driven by the need to survive the existential threat of the Bolshevik Soviet Union. Finland maintained its democratic governance and independence, never becoming a German satellite state. Germany’s support in both wars was a lifeline against Russia and the Bolsheviks, but Finland focused on national survival, not advancing Germany’s imperialist or Nazi objectives.

Finland and Germany allied in the First World War and War of Independence (1918) and the Continuation War (1941–1944) to counter the threat of Russia and the Bolshevik Soviet Union. Germany saved Finland by providing training, troops, and weapons, but Finland did not support Nazi ideology, fighting as a pragmatic ally for its independence and security.




In the Continuation War, Germany was Finland's only concrete ally against the Bolshevik Soviet Union.
Finland had no choice, without German support the Bolshevik Soviet Union would certainly have conquered Finland.
The USA and its allies were then on the side of the Bolshevik Soviet Union and the Finns received a lot of American aid to the Bolshevik Soviet allies as spoils of war.

Today we are allies, on the same side as we were after the end of World War II. The purchase of the F-18 Hornet strengthened the relationship, and NATO membership in 2023 sealed the alliance.
Finland was involved in Afghanistan after 2001, even though we were not a NATO member at the time

USA-FIN-lippu-V1.jpg
 
c379273879211dd77cee298db0eba701a08a40d9670414ffb498bbe22f021b53.jpg


Today, Sunday, April 20. with the flag, we remember those evacuated in Finland's wars, our history and the importance of the war in the lives of future generations as well.

During World War II, approximately 440,000 Finnish citizens were permanently evacuated from the areas ceded by Finland to the Soviet Union, a total of 11 percent of the population of Finland. Approximately 200,000 citizens were temporarily evacuated as a result of the war.
The evacuation affected the entire nation. The settlement of the evacuees and their adaptation to a new life was a central part of the reconstruction of Finland, in which the entire society participated.
The settlement of immigrants helped to create a foundation for building a welfare society. No one was left alone, but responsibility was shared for those who lost their homeland.

Evakot.jpg


As Russia's neighbor, we know what the beast from the east is capable of. We know the cruelty it has inflicted on civilians in Ukraine.

We never want war again, that's why we are preparing and building our own defense so credible that no one wants to come across our border. We trust the alliance, but Finland is primarily defended by Finnish soldiers.

ee9d80b5-be41-1051-3a23-bfa510c24f90

39-1106183644bed1a367aa

AQyRF1yU90ia4oDABGBUpbAuP1g.jpg

qupJJ8Dg0dUYgp2B0gmVhgIdFT6JrOB5aZsyZ8epExTfSJXargtMw9Et2bpS1bbHMiDH1v4Y2K5SLnZ0vkNdNhpiSR_nwl1A2FsGn7klExkpgenxyjoF2C4YDYz8_cqYpcB9JgZ1S0HfHRVJ6x-YuA.jpg

043af5e7-5736-5943-8d84-56f3fc51b69b

8947990.jpg

93a586cef8889379678e23bdfd8cc55f645d666688b5ca20e67268c9c457df8c.png

6693649.jpg

29316971ce624a1a2e9dec0e93d923b9168cc8b64fc967e952ea28b631ab5ec9.jpg

7236609.jpg

images

panssarivaunu-lk-20-4-2025.jpg

4642a0aa-c82f-58c1-a5e6-6366e926ee4c


Never again, at least not alone.
Si vis pacem - para bellum​
 
Ukraine's intelligence chief, Kyrylo Budanov about Finnish volunteers in Ukraine:
"I do not want to offend anyone, but Finnish fighters are from another planet compared to fighters from other countries"
WhatsApp-Image-2025-04-19-at-10.45.31_0fa84c69.jpg

Finnish Reservists: The Quiet Warriors From Another Planet
Latest Business News in Finland | SNN NEWS
Over a hundred Finnish soldiers serve in Ukraine. About ten Finns have fallen for the freedom of Ukraine.

There are good soldiers everywhere in the world. In Finland, every man is subject to military service. Everyone is checked and only the weakest are released. That is why even the best of all in every age group receive military training.
Military service for women is currently voluntary.

Markkanen began his compulsory military service on April 17, 2023, at the military base of Santahamina in Helsinki, Finland. He finished his service on September 29, 2023
Lauri Markkanen - Wikipedia

Lauri Markkanen: NBA star undertaking military service in Finland | CNN
 
Last edited:
Viljam Pylkäs​

Viljam Pylkäs was an ordinary Finnish farmer from Karelian Isthmus and a veteran of Winter War.

He lost his home to russians and because of this, hated russia from the bottom of his heart.

In this thread I'll tell his story and about the incident that made him famous.

GpE0p2ZXsAA2R3V


Pylkäs is the model for hero character "Antero Rokka" of the book and movies "Tuntematon Sotilas"(Unknown Soldier) written by Finnish author and brother in arms Väinö Linna.

GpE03diX0AExbAB


As said in the beginning, Viljam Pylkäs was a farmer with wife and two kids from small town of Sakkola in Karelian Isthmus.

He was trained as machinegunner during his conscript military service (1933-1934) and served in this role during the Winter War.
GpE3XAxXoAAbr6X


Pyökäs fought in the ErP 6 (Seperate Battalion 6) "Karelian Battalion" considered as elite unit even though it had had regular infantry training.

The battalion saw extremely heavy battles defending the Mannerheim Line at shores of Vuoksi river and Taipaleenjoki river.
GpE3Z6eW4AAoGWS


Many men of this battalion were living in Karelian Isthmus, so many men saw the destruction of their homes during the battles.

Pylkäs lost his farm and home among the areas that Finland had to give to USSR in the peace treaty of 1940.

In Continuation War Viljam Pylkäs served in a machinegun company of Infantry Regiment 8, in same unit with young squad leader corporal Väinö Linna, future famous writer.

During offensive phase of Continuation war, Infantry Regiment 8 reached it's objectives at Svir river in january 1942 and after the battles ended the regiment dug into defensive positions on February 1, starting the stationary warfare time of the regiment.
GpE2kXIWUAAKnBm


Legendary event that Pylkäs is known for, occurred at Pertjärvi in April 1942 during the Soviet spring offensives.

Regiment was located in middle of swamps of southern shore of Svir river where the line consisted of nothing but seperate outposts surrounded by the wilderness.

GpE6Xw1XEAAKJPz


On one morning of April, after their platoon had repelled an attack, Pylkäs's platoon heard yells for help and sounds of heavy gun fire from direction of neighboring regiment the Finnish-Swedish JR 61.
GpE5Ll-XEAEvVkY


The main attack was focused there.

Platoon leader Einari Kokkonen ("Koskela" in Unknown Soldier) told Pylkäs to go see if they were leaving their positions.

There was about 100 meters to the closest outpost of JR 61.

Pylkäs grabbed Suomi SMG and took private Kärkkäinen with him.

As they approached the OP, a guard post's leader came at them yelling that the russians were coming right onto them.

Pylkäs realized the line wasn't going to hold, told to get him more SMG magazines and went to nearby LMG nest in a good spot.

Soviets were attacking already about 20 meters away in deep snow, as he opened fire.

GpE5PEFXkAAYZ0b


He emptied up magazine after another, the JR 61 soldiers crawled in the snow passing on more SMG magazines from the rear, giving them to Kärkkäinen who was refilling magazines for Pylkäs.
He kept firing until the barrel overheated and was then replaced but as he continued firing the retreating enemies got out of range.

Pylkäs fired 17 submachinegun magazines in total and 83 kills was later counted to his account.

Even though Pylkäs was always excellent soldier in combat he never received the Mannerheim Cross because he had serious problems with the military discipline that he didn't appriciate and was therefor constantly in trouble with his superior officers.

Nevertheless his actions brought him the 4th class Cross of Liberty with swords,and as Germans heard about this incident,he was also awarded the 2nd class Iron Cross.

Later during the war he participated in repelling smaller attacks and then fought in battles during the major Soviet offensive.

During the retreating phase,on July 4,1944, the war ended for Viljam Pylkäs when he was wounded by a bullet that hit his arm crushing the bone.

Pylkäs survived the wars and lived a long life, dying at the age of 86 years in Lempäälä where he is buried today with his wife.

Rest in peace, Finnish legend.

GpFDERiW4AASgAX


Copy from X
https://x.com/TallbarFIN/status/1914376123573485842

Finnish Wikipedia with Google Translate into English
Viljam Pylk"as – Wikipedia
 
Last edited:
Pylkäs lost his farm and home among the areas that Finland had to give to USSR in the peace treaty of 1940.

I believe Simo Hayha also lost his family farm the same way. But I believe Finland gave him another farm in a different location.
Great warriors both, and a credit to their country.
 
Back
Top