My New Glock 42

Dump1567

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2003
Messages
2,450
Reaction score
4,899
Location
AZ
When I first heard about these, I wasn't real excited it being a .380. And although I own several S&W revolvers (and occasionally carry one), my EDC is a Glock 23 backed-up by a Ruger LCP.

I got to handle the G42 at SHOT and really liked the size. Already being a Glock fan, I decided to get one to replace the LCP. My LCP has worked fine, but it's small grip leaves alot to be desired (I did add the Hogue which helped a lot). Firing the LCP is fairly uncomfortable after a few rounds and the gutter sights aren't that great.

I picked-up the 42 today and took it to the range. More comfortable to shoot than the LCP, and much better sights. The trigger didn't seem as good as the standard Glock trigger. The biggest improvement is in recoil. This has less recoil than any .380 I recall shooting (Colt mustang & Gov. 380, Sig 232, Ruger LCP).

I haven't shot HP through it, but it worked flawlessly with ball ammo. Still need to ring it out some more, but am happy with my purchase.

Shown below in a Kahr Holster (holsters a tad loose and too long). I added the Hogue Handall Jr. which needed to be trimmed. I look forward to more accessories for these. I think a finger extension or +1 and night sights would be great.

Anyway, if you haven't played with one of these yet, give it a try.

Size comparision thread:
http://smith-wessonforum.com/lounge/359903-glock-42-vs-ruger-lcp-vs-colt-gov-380-a.html#post137728569

Oh, and when I was at SHOT talking to the Glock rep, he did mention the fact that Glock never skips model numbers. And eluded that a Glock model 40 would eventually come out?



 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
A LGS that is a huge Glock dealer (5th or 6th in the U.S., I believe) had 50 in stock on the release date & sold them all in two hours!

I am a Glock fan & was still totally prepared to despise it. After all, Glock arrived at the dance after the band stopped playing on this one. Who really needs another compact.380 ??!! That ship has sailed!

But no.... The clerk let me hold their personal gun. I MUST have one now. ;) I'm going to grab one when the next shipment arrives.
 
Sucks that its LEO only in CA.

I'm sure they'll soon be doing SSE.

I think it's a great choice for those with small hands (ie; women) or others that might be recoil sensitive.
 
I held one today at the Gun Show. It seemed lighter then it looks. I to own an LCP. I used to have a Kahr CM9. I pocket carry both of them. I really don't like the long trigger pull on either. The Kahr is worse and the reset is a mile long. I sold the Kahr and replaced it with a Shield 9mm. The shield is a little bigger and a little heavier, but the nicer trigger is a good trade off. If the G42 was smaller I would get one, but since there are 9mm's about the same size I didn't. I'm a Glock guy too and can't wait for them to release a single stack 9mm.
 
Geeesh... just when .380 ammo had come back to Earth in price and availability. I guess I better stock up before the Glock 42 craze goes full tilt.
 
Why would that bother you? Curious. :confused:

This is a paragraph from the article and it has pictures to illustrate. I am not saying not to do it, each to their own, but not me. I have several Glocks that I carry with plastic retention holsters.

The trusty, comfortable, leather holster I had been using for a year and two weeks had done what a baseball glove does after lots of use; It got soft. This particular holster carries the pistol outside the waistband, but inside the belt. The belt slides through slots in the outer side of the holster.

The problem stemmed from the leather on the inner side of the holster getting soft. A crease formed, which eventually was large enough to extend beyond the trigger. Manipulate the gun in just the wrong manner and this crease is no different than a finger on the trigger. Boom!
 
How does it compare size wise to the LCP?
I've read the specs but am having trouble sizing it up sa compared to some of the more common 380's on the market.
None in my are yet go fondle either :-(
 
This is a paragraph from the article and it has pictures to illustrate. I am not saying not to do it, each to their own, but not me. I have several Glocks that I carry with plastic retention holsters.

The trusty, comfortable, leather holster I had been using for a year and two weeks had done what a baseball glove does after lots of use; It got soft. This particular holster carries the pistol outside the waistband, but inside the belt. The belt slides through slots in the outer side of the holster.

The problem stemmed from the leather on the inner side of the holster getting soft. A crease formed, which eventually was large enough to extend beyond the trigger. Manipulate the gun in just the wrong manner and this crease is no different than a finger on the trigger. Boom!

Must have been a real cheap holster. BUT, I still don't buy his story. IMHO. Thanks for the reply opaul.
 
How does it compare size wise to the LCP?
I've read the specs but am having trouble sizing it up sa compared to some of the more common 380's on the market.
None in my are yet go fondle either :-(

I handled one and it's quite a bit larger and little bit heavier than an LCP.
 
I bet it will not be long before we see videos of "The twenty five cent trigger job" on Youtube. Polish the connection rod on the trigger assembly. Go lightly with the Dremel.



Want to bet!
 
How does it compare size wise to the LCP?
I've read the specs but am having trouble sizing it up sa compared to some of the more common 380's on the market.
None in my are yet go fondle either :-(

It's significantly bigger than the Ruger LCP. Very close to the Ruger LC380 with the width of an LC9.
 
Last edited:
I think for pocket carry, the LCP is a better choice. The 42 will work, it's just bigger and heavier. For size and shootability, the 42 wins.

I think it boils down to what you carry for? The LCP for me is more of a up close back-up/get away from danger gun. The 42 with it's larger size, controlability, and sights would fit more of a traditional SD gun (upclose, but could engage at further distances).

For my needs, it fits the minimum for a t-shirt and shorts hip carry gun (I'm not a fan of pocket carry) when I can't or don't want to carry something bigger.

The LCP fits the pocket carry role when I can't carry a gun or have a tucked in shirt.
 
Back
Top