coltle6920
Member
I'm not necessarily talking about what was used 100yrs ago but rather what's available today. I'm not that familiar with long guns so can we stick to handguns?
On the upper end there seems to be more difference between calibers and their effectiveness. On the lower end it seems to be more of a marketing thing to sell more firearms.
Do we really need .25acp, .30super, .32acp and .380acp or are we just catering to the new and uneducated? Seems to me we'd have more ammo available if the brass wasn't used for what I consider unnecessary calibers.
Is this worth discussing?
On the upper end there seems to be more difference between calibers and their effectiveness. On the lower end it seems to be more of a marketing thing to sell more firearms.
Do we really need .25acp, .30super, .32acp and .380acp or are we just catering to the new and uneducated? Seems to me we'd have more ammo available if the brass wasn't used for what I consider unnecessary calibers.
Is this worth discussing?