.... It is, after all, range ammo.
Disagree, somewhat. I emailed the following response to Federal's use of SP primers in the .45 ACP, and intend contacting Winchester with the same concern:
Let me be the first to 'recommend' that Federal rethink that idea! There are millions in the reloading fraternity using .45 ACP brass. The .45 ACP has always had a large primer pocket.
Major manufacturers contaminating available, reloadable, brass with a variation that would require another segregation operation can not be welcomed by the shooting public. Try a little separation exercise looking at .45 brass with different primer pockets, you will be cross-eyed in short order! Having to set up a progressive reloading machine for different primer pockets in the same caliber is not just time consuming, but ridiculous.
Your claim of concern for the cost to consumers is interesting. I like Federal and Winchester brand ammo, or have liked it in the past! With the possible, imminent, demise of the 45 GAP round, or the certain reduced demand for it, I think the bean counters came up with the idea to load all those extra SP primer GAP brass as .45 ACP stuff. Again, NOT a good idea, only a good idea for the manufacturers bottom line!
If you want to reduce the cost to the "consumer," load all the SP primers into non-reloadable cases like CCI or the Russian stuff. That way, you only add to the contamination of the planet not our reloading process! Throw away Russian .45 ACP, steel cased, ammo is available for just over $12 a box of 50! Federal's Champion SP .45 ACP ammo is so close in price to the LP primer stuff (the same or more, in many stores) as to be laughable as an idea to "help consumers."