If you don't mind my asking sir, why must it be made of all steel?
I noticed that the beretta 85 cheetah started to feel really uncomfortable in my hand after awhile of snap cap practice with it while the other guns in collection didnt, all of which are either poylmer (two glocks, a M17L 9mm M23 .40, and ruger 22/45) or steel (smith 49. 29, K22/17 dan wesson 357, ruger ect ect) save for one of the browning 25 acp's
and there was no other reason for it to do that besides it being alloy framed, as the checkering was fine, the grips werent too sharp although they were plastic which could have been a contributing factor to it heating up in my hand like it did and feeling sticky
and then I picked up my old steel kimber and came to that conclusion as I've picked up the kimber and the glock many times for snap cap practice and they've never felt like that after practicing with them
plus its happened on range trips with it before, I kept wondering okay why dont I like the feel of this gun right now, something is really off about it while when I picked it up at the gunshop I really liked it as much as the steel framed sig 232 I was trying on for size all of those years ago.
and I find that old steel and wood guns just have a look that polymer guns just dont have hence the preference, plus the polymer ones I knew of dont have any sort of external safety like the kahr arms, a real put off in a pocket gun kind of use, atleast with a semi auto unless the triggers heavy enough.
plus I dont care for kahr arms in any regard and they were the only ones I knew of who dont have the glock trigger system that I'm trying to get away from with the glock 17L and 23 as I've thought about getting rid of them many times for that trigger system as its starting to bug me while shooting them now.