Packard
Member
For the longest time I've been using Russell Athletics pocket Tees because they were full-cut in the body and had long tails. This made concealing a weapon easy. I always bought size "L/G" (Large/Grande).
The other day I bought two more. I laundered them before trying them on (a good idea) and they were way too small.
I wrote to Russell Athletics questioning them about this. I figured that the shirts were mislabled, and they fit as skimpy as Fruit of the Loom shirts which were the all time skimpy fit tees.
They wrote back "due to consumer feedback and influences beyond our control we were forced to change the fit of our tee shirts."
I thought this was a strange answer until I Googled "Russell Athletics" and found out that they were bought out by Fruit of the Loom.
They suggested that I buy one that was one size larger.
At this time I am no longer recommending Russell Athletics for concealed carry cover garments.
I am also worried about other corners the parent company may force Russell Athletics to take.
Buyer beware.
The other day I bought two more. I laundered them before trying them on (a good idea) and they were way too small.
I wrote to Russell Athletics questioning them about this. I figured that the shirts were mislabled, and they fit as skimpy as Fruit of the Loom shirts which were the all time skimpy fit tees.
They wrote back "due to consumer feedback and influences beyond our control we were forced to change the fit of our tee shirts."
I thought this was a strange answer until I Googled "Russell Athletics" and found out that they were bought out by Fruit of the Loom.
They suggested that I buy one that was one size larger.
At this time I am no longer recommending Russell Athletics for concealed carry cover garments.
I am also worried about other corners the parent company may force Russell Athletics to take.
Buyer beware.