The 'unofficial' 58 Club

Winchester apparently has downloaded their old 175gr Silvertip deer hunting load to 1250fps. Ordered a couple of new boxes for hunting season to run in the 657 but the round just ain't the same! Much tamer!
So tried them in the ugly 58. Very controllable and little muzzle flash comapared to the usual. Kinda pricey, but if it works in your 58, it might be the best SD load out there.

2012-09-27jmoorestuff014_zps21de9318.jpg

Note the deer on the old box on top)

2012-09-21jmoorestuff038_zpsce01883a.jpg


2012-09-21jmoorestuff039_zpsec93b5c7.jpg

Only a couple or three inches below POA at 25 yards.
 
Fun to revisit this Thread again.


So, are there more offerings or variety now from Ammnunition Makers for the .41 Magnum Revolver, than there used to be?
 
Last edited:
Silvertips have always been modestly loaded...1300 from a 6" and about 1225 from a 4"....this was through a chrono back in 1986 area...

As to ammo....

Remington
210 JSP

Wincehster
175 Silvertip
240 Platinum Tip

Speer
210 DeepCurl

Federal
250 CastCore
180 Barnes
210 JHP
210 Fusion
210 Swift A-Frame

CorBon
170 JHC
210 JHC
250 WFN Hardcast
180 Barnes DPX

Buffalo Bore
170 JHC
265 Hardcast
180 Barnes
230 Keith

Hornady
210 FlexTip
210 XTP

Georgia Arms
210 XTP
210 LSWC (Target Load)
200 Remington JHP
210 DeepCurl HP

DoubleTap
210 JHP
180 Barnes
250 Hardcast WFN

HSM
210 SWC
230 Keith GC
210XTP

Barnes
180 HP

Grizzly
250 Hardcast WFN
210 JSP

Bitterroot Valley
210 JHP
210 Cast

Great Prices...


.41 Magnum BVAC SWC 210 Grain 50 Round Box 1200 fps Practice and Hunting Ammunition

.41 Magnum BVAC JHP 210 Grain 50 Round Box 1303 fps Hunting and Self Defense Ammunition


Bob
 
Last edited:
Yipes!

Thanks Bob!

I had no idea there were so many Cartridge offerings now for the .41 Magnum Revolver.
 
SuperMan said:
Silvertips have always been modestly loaded...1300 from a 6" and about 1225 from a 4"....this was through a chrono back in 1986 area...

Bob
Click to expand...

I would have to guess that they've backed off a bit more. Dunno if I'll bother to chronograph these back to back but the felt recoil and muzzle blast is less with the new stuff. Muzzle flash is about non-existant. If I find another old box of 175gr ammo it might be incentive to set up the sky screens. Winchester isn't giving the new stuff away: over $1 per round! About bad enough to send me back to the rifle range...
 
Somewhere over here there is another thread that has a new box of Silvertip ammo that I ran over a chrono and into water filled jugs...it was about the same... It is always possible they have downloaded it again lately...

Bob
 
mikeruns said:
I found mine at Greentop guns near Richmond, Va about '91 or '92 when stationed @ Quantico.
Was a SFPD revolver, so interesting how it ended up on the east coast only to make it back to Socal with me since '93 and now central TX and maybe home state of MT in near future.
A travelin' 58 I call Buford.
Think it cost me $168 or $188.
Click to expand...


as an aside...greentops is alive and well...in the next couple of weeks they are moving from their current bldg.(where they have been since 1947) right up the street to a vacated gander mtn.i too love a 41 mag.!
 
kennyb said:
as an aside...greentops is alive and well...in the next couple of weeks they are moving from their current bldg.(where they have been since 1947) right up the street to a vacated gander mtn.i too love a 41 mag.!
Click to expand...

A friend introduced me to Greentops some years ago on a multi-state gun show roadtrip. Have made some small purchases there (mostly reloading stuff), but what they were good for is having lots of odd current production S&W variants. Inspired a couple special orders for new Smiths when we got back home.

ETA: Ol' Ugly isn't too bad on the left side, but the right is a mess. (See Post #367) Still, it's better to me than my first 58, which although thoroughly tricked out with a ball lock on the crane, minimal cylinder slop due to a custom oversized yoke OD, and a great trigger job, was reblued. Just couldn't stand it! Sold it in a moment of weakness.

2012-09-21jmoorestuff036_zps69f24566.jpg

"Ol' Ugly's" good side.
 
Last edited:
Guess what? You guys have me thinkin'. The earlier pic of the 58 with Jordan Troopers on it helped, as I ordered a set of those from Herretts a few weeks ago for my 4" 28. I like the business-like appearance of the 58..... a lot.
 
O.K.here are my two model 58's.The first one is an S prefix serial number gun that is in very good condition.I thought I was never going to be able to pick one of these up,but got lucky a few months back.
The other 58 is of the new classic series.I bought it first because I could not find an original no dash 58.The classic model actually shoots very good.I swapped out the new style grips for some older magnas that I think look better on a 58.

IMG_0868.jpg

IMG_0869.jpg

IMG_3400.jpg

IMG_3397.jpg
 
SuperMan said:
Somewhere over here there is another thread that has a new box of Silvertip ammo that I ran over a chrono and into water filled jugs...it was about the same... It is always possible they have downloaded it again lately...

Bob
Click to expand...

As you noted previously, I found 1997 published MV to be 1250 fps for the 175gr W-W load, so there ought not be a difference, but the 58 is much "better" with the new loads. I'm wondering if they didn't just change the powder for one with improved burn characteristics? If the bullets expand, then the exact MV doesn't really matter to me for a carry load.
 
jaymoore said:
As you noted previously, I found 1997 published MV to be 1250 fps for the 175gr W-W load, so there ought not be a difference, but the 58 is much "better" with the new loads. I'm wondering if they didn't just change the powder for one with improved burn characteristics? If the bullets expand, then the exact MV doesn't really matter to me for a carry load.
Click to expand...

At 1250 FPS or better...even if the Bullet didn't expand...the BG would...So...
 
Mmm, I could have phrased that better. Basically, the point is that given decent terminal ballistics, the perceived recoil reduction and reduced muzzle flash make the current W-W loading quite viable as a carry load. Which means there's more likihood of actually carrying the 58. Previously, it was a bit brutish. Now it shoots like a .357.
 
scout II said:
O.K.here are my two model 58's.The first one is an S prefix serial number gun that is in very good condition.I thought I was never going to be able to pick one of these up,but got lucky a few months back.
The other 58 is of the new classic series.I bought it first because I could not find an original no dash 58.The classic model actually shoots very good.I swapped out the new style grips for some older magnas that I think look better on a 58.

IMG_0868.jpg

IMG_0869.jpg

IMG_3400.jpg

IMG_3397.jpg
Click to expand...

Scout,

I was looking at your photos of the original run of the 58 and the new Classic side by side and just noticed the 'Classic' has the top side plate screw. If they were trying to duplicate the original version (and added the IL) why would they add that screw?

I'm glad to hear the Classic 58 shoots well....it seems that all we hear these days of the new production guns is of their flaws. Thanks for sharing.
 
I see on the other classic N frames like the models 25,27,29,57,58,they all have the top right side plate screw like the old 5 screw guns.But I don't see it on there K or L frame classic series guns.I don't know why they put it there.Maybe someone here knows.I sure is interesting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top