One of the police types appeared saying that the guns would be checked to see if they are stolen and if so would be returned to the rightful owners..... uh, I'm not going to hold my breath on that one.
That's why they call it a thin blue line.
One of the police types appeared saying that the guns would be checked to see if they are stolen and if so would be returned to the rightful owners..... uh, I'm not going to hold my breath on that one.
We've got one coming up that pays$200 for working handgun/longgun and $300 for assault rifle. Wish i had some Jennings or Raven .25s.
Some 23 years ago Australia had a bad shooting and started anti gun laws plus a big buyback program. By the time the buyback was finished they spent 320 million dollars (Australian) on about 644 thousand guns.
Results of the '96 Australian Gun Laws (updated 2009) (GunsAndCrime.org)
Victoria was the only jurisdiction to release details. 47.5 percent were .22 rimfire and 47.8 percent were shotguns. Most guns that were turned-in were junk. Probably typical of other jurisdictions.
My quick math seems to indicate that Australia spent about 496 dollars of taxpayers money per gun. Lots of people had to be hired to get the job done it seems.