.25 ACP ballistic test-vs .22 Long Rifle

I just don't think you could get a .380 ACP in a package the size of this Colt .25 ACP.

219299573.jpg

Check out a 'Seecamp'. I'm not a .25 basher though. The reason so many 'experts' say a .22LR is more powerful is because they are looking at Mfg.'s published performance data for the .22LR . Which is of course intened for rifles.

If the .25ACP was so inferior to a .22, I doubt JMB would have bothered with it.

For those who quote Col. Cooper so freely, I think he also said. "A .25 in your pocket is more powerful then a .357, in your gun safe."
 
In 1986 I was working in the ER at the Washington Hospital Center in D.C. A call comes in from an in-bound ambo that they have a patient with multiple GSWs to the chest.

This hospital has a large and excellent trauma unit, and they geared up for the pending admission.

When the EMTs get the guy--who was conscious and not in a good mood--into the admitting area, the surgeon cuts off his blood-soaked shirt, stops, laughs, asks the nurse to hand him a forceps, and then proceeds to extract four .25 caliber rounds from just below the skin. . .all four had "scuffed" but not penetrated the heavy chest muscles.

I'm just saying. . .


Bullseye
 
Therevjay,
Excellent point about Browning's probable views on the matter. After all, he designed this cartridge with the intent of chambering it in a vest pocket-sized gun, which could be intended for only one use: self-defense at extremely close range. Maybe somebody has access to references which would document his intent with the .25ACP, but I presume he wanted a cartridge with power in the .22LR range, yet designed for optimum burn rate in 2" barrels without the flash and report of a .22 designed to burn completely in a rifle-length barrel, plus the reliability of a "central fire" primer & a rimless design optimum for automatic pistols.

Does anyone have access to information comparing the dB levels and/or muzzle flash intensity of short-barreled .22LR and .25ACP pistols? I don't, so I'm only guessing, especially since I'm brand-new to this caliber. I only know that most of my rather substantial hearing loss is probably due to shooting hi-vel .22s in a 4" H&R Mod. 929 as a teen; funny, they sure were a lot more intense-sounding than all the rounds I shot from rifles! (Duh.)
 
Bullseye,

Wasn't that the case of the ".25 Caliber Sniper," who shot his victims at 100+ yards, firing thru a phone book to mask the report? (OK, just kidding :-)

Your experience is exactly the kind of thing that always made me (and doubtless others) run shy of the .25. It compares with two Cooper stories (IIRC), in which a guy had trouble committing suicide with one and a burly woman absorbed 6 rounds in the chest but simply wanted the cops to retrieve her husband so she could beat him senseless! The suicide case shot himself in the temple, then looked in the mirror, stanched the resulting trickle of blood, and went back downstairs to rejoin the party. He died later.

Seriously, do you have any idea why the four bullets in your ER case failed so completely to penetrate? Leather coat or something, perhaps? I know that skin/hide is amazingly resistant, and it's common for bullets to pass thru humans, deer, etc. and lodge underneath the skin on the opposite side, but I rather doubt the ER physician would have been laughing if the bullets had all entered the guy's back & lodged under the skin of his chest :-) And poor manufacture might make one squib load perform this poorly, but probably not four.

I demonstrated to my own satisfaction this spring that the old story of the .38 S&W (.380 British service cartridge) "failing to penetrate an overcoat" was either aprocryphal or the result of damaged/substandard ammunition. I am at a loss to explain the complete failure you witnessed with the .25ACP. Any ideas?
 
Louisiana Man,

I am sorry, but I don't. I wasn't at the scene of the shooting. This would have been February or early March, so a heavy coat is a possibility.


Bullseye
 
I have heard that some of the cheap 25's have very loose tolerances, I.E. loose oversize bores. Those would not develope the muzzle velocity of a properly sized bore.
I know that I once fired my Beretta 21a in 25acp into a stack of phone books. One round of FMJ, one round of XTP JHP. The FMJ went through the first phone book and lodged an inch into the second, while the JHP only made about two thirds of the first phone book...did not open at all. I also fired a CCI MiniMag solid into the same stack using a Beretta 21a 22LR. It did about the same as the 25 JHP.
 
Hi:
Some years in the past a BG surprised one of our Officers and shot the Officer in the chest once and the .25acp jammed on the second round.
The .25 bullet struck the Officer in the chest, followed a rib around and entered the Officer's heart. As the Officer was falling, He drew his .357 service revolver and fired all six rounds. Five of the six rounds were lethal hits and the sixth round was a shoulder hit. Both the Officer and suspect were DOA.
My first homicide call in 1962 was an abused spouse shot the abuser husband with a Colt .25acp in the chest. Husband DOA.
Jimmy
 
Jimmy,
I have vast respect for LEOs, as most of the people y'all meet on any given day are having the worst day of their lives. The Baton Rouge cops I saw up close many years ago, dealing with a tense domestic situation, were both young officers. . .but they handled the situation like old pros. I was only a teenager, but I could certainly tell that! My heart goes out to the friend you lost.

As for .25s. . .your experiences underline the fact that these so-called "mouse guns" can indeed be lethal. The lesson I draw from the first vignette is simple: keep my weapon clean, and use ammo that feeds as reliably as possible. . .and if I have to START shooting, I need to KEEP shooting!

I've got about 5 boxes of Fiocchi FMJ, and if a couple hundred rounds of it feed smoothly, I'll just stick with them. Nothing against the 35g Hornady XTP JHPs that came with the gun & operate just fine, but I don't want to reduce penetration to obtain mild expansion.

Final note: as mentioned earlier, although I'm just about to begin concealed carry for the first time, I'm not new to weapons. Other, heavier weapons will be my first choice, but down here in Louisiana, the summer heat and humidity just have to be experienced to be believed. At times, a "mouse gun" will be the most practical option for me.
 
I don't shoot my Mauser 1910 much, but I sure lust after my friend's 25 ACP double rifle. I can't remember having shot a more enjoyable shoulder rifle; it exploded grapefruit quite convincingly at 15 yds, and I made a right and a left on charging bowling pins at 25 yds.
 
Jan Libourel wrote a wonderful piece in a Guns & Ammo special called "Pocket Pistols" (June 1984) where he compared the .25 ACP and .22 LR in two identical Beretta Model 21A pistols. The .22 LR cme up short of the .25 ACP due to the lighter (and softer) lead bullet. This inhibited the penetration and its effective range, while the .25 ACP's FMJ (generating nearly identical energies) penetrated more deeply due to bullet construction.

One can't deny the immutable laws of physics.

Scott
 
Sadly, in short barrels both .22 LR and .25 ACP hollow point ammunition doesn't travel fast enough to provide both sufficient penetration and expansion. In these handguns, penetration is your friend! this is where the .25 ACP comes into it's own. When you encounter bones, the soft lead of the .22 LR inhibits penetration even further. The centerfire .25 along with the FMJ bullet profile immediately supersedes the .22 LR. If the rim fire fails to ignite in a PD situation, as they occasionally can and will, you'll be in deep trouble.

Don't buy all the "the .25 ACP won't penetrate" bull pucky. This was the genius of John Moses Browning. A center fire cartridge with a jacketed bullet that would penetrate better than the lead, heel-type bullet being fired from a short-barreled autoloading cartridge with a charge originally designed to be discharged from a minimum of an 18" barreled rifle.

Dy'a think?

Scott
 
I have never owned a .25, and it never ever appealed to me. Perhaps it was the only .25's you ever heard of was Lorcins or Ravens and the mere ownershiip or possession of one, and you got classed as a thug. They were notorious for Saturday night specials in the area I came from, until Miami Firearms and RG came out with their die cast framed and steel barrel inserts for $49.99 new in the box in .38Special. Our pawn shops were I am at now is full of the "cheap" .25's. Bad as they are they will always have a place in society. When I had a FFL I sold a boat load of .25 Lorcins. Could not get them fast enough.
 
Someone above questioned whether a .380 can be made as small as a .25. The old Bayard came in .380. Recoil and bite to the shooting hand from blast as the rounds eject might be an issue.

My father had a Walther Model 9 that stung my trigger finger a little as a lad, as I recall. And I do not have fat hands. He had a Bernadelli .25, too, but I never shot it. It seemed well made, but I don't think it has a reputation for particularly reliable operation. Do any of you own one? I'm pretty sure that it was inspired somewhat by the Walther Model 9, with open top slide.

I want a Beretta M-950B .25 and if I didn't always need the money more for other things I'd hunt down a prisitine Baby Browning or a stainless Fraser/Bauer copy.

The Countess of Ramonones in Spain was originally an American woman, an OSS agent in WW II. Stationed in Spain, she klled a gypsy who came at her with a knife, using a .25 Beretta. Model of Beretta not stated, but it was OSS- issued to agents in Madrid at that time. Given the date, it'd be a 318 or 418. I think this was in her first autobiographical book about her adventures as an OSS and later CIA agent, who married into the Spanish nobility. Ask your library or Online for, "The Spy Wore Red," by Aline, Countess of Ramonones (sp).

I've read a bunch about the .25, and it wil kill fast if a vital nerve center is hit, sometimes the heart. Ian Fleming carried a Baby Browning .25 as a Royal Navy Reserve intelligence agent before writing the Bond books. His comment that the fictional Goldfinger shot at his opponent's right eye is telling. Fleming was (in the real world) obsessed with concealment. He had to be.

His evil character in, "Thunderball" who had the atom bombs also had a Colt .25. I don't doubt that a very disciplined man who shoots at one's eyes could kill with a 25 at the ranges involved.

Where Fleming went astray was in having Bond shoot into a railway engine with his Beretta .25. The bullets would never pierce the glass. But that probably applies to most rounds that can be used in a small pistol. Had I written that scene, I'd have had Bond acquire a rifle or SMG from an opponent.

I mentioned that to him in a letter when I had recently graduated high school and already knew a lot more about guns than do most mystery writers. His secretary very courteously replied that he was away, but would see my letter on his return. I suggested that Bond think about wearing a S&W M-36 with three-inch barrel in a Gaylord belt holster. At the time, I forgot the need for the smallest possible gun, for concealment in his work environment. The PPK had arrived several years before, and it's about as big as I think the author thought that Bond could carry. And the Walther .32 holds more ammo than the five-shot S&W revolver.

Later, Geoffrey Boothroyd and I exchanged some letters and Boothroyd felt that the J-frame S&W was the answer, although he favored the Centennial Airweight. After the Model 60 arrived in 1965, he felt that the stainless construction made it easily the Bond gun of choice. But Ian Fleming had died the previous year, so nothing came of that.

I think we both underestimated the .25 Beretta, but the S&W .38's still seem to me a better choice than the PPK .32. The Model 60, in particular, would probably have been my choice for a Bond gun in the 1960's. But I respect the .25 more now than I did, after reading more about its real life effectiveness under ideal circumstances.

As thriller writers go, I think that both Peter O'Donnell (Modesty Blaise books) and Jack Higgins exaggerate the .25. Modesty used (among other guns) a MAB .25 and Higgins's characters often use Colt .25's with JHP ammo, which the author thinks is a LOT more effective than it is. In fairness, they use both PPK .32's and Browning 9mm's when concealment allows.

I want some .25's, but they'll be used in context. In that role, I think they may prove deadly.

The posts here that are actually valid are among the best yet seen on .25 autos. The velocity tests in this topic were wonderful to see. Too often, a short-barrelled .25 is compared to a longer-barrelled .22LR. The .22LR is seldom available in guns the size of the .25. Usually, such guns in .22 chamber the .22 Short, which is less potent and has feeding and priming and bullet integrity issues.

Oh: Fleming had Bond tape the grip of his .25 Beretta, for added thinnesss. I seriously doubt that it'd matter. He certainly should have had the grip safety pinned shut, though.
 
Last edited:
I agree that the .25 is the low man on the totem pole and .45 is better.

I have and shoot many different rifles and handguns. Many years ago while out in the locale desert on safari with friends we had various Military rifles. I had my last round of .303 British and was going back to camp to get something else with more ammo. I surprised a sitting Jack Rabbit, his back to me, at about 20 feet. Fired the .303 and the rabbit was gone, ran off. I thought I wasted my last round and proceeded walking only to find the bunny shot right through the shoulder blades where I aimed. He ran 15 maybe 20 feet out of sight.

Now, we all know that a .303 British round is more than enough for a rabbit, but he did not STOP right then and there. What make bullets work or not work are a mystery to me
 
I agree that the .25 is the low man on the totem pole and .45 is better.

I have and shoot many different rifles and handguns. Many years ago while out in the locale desert on safari with friends we had various Military rifles. I had my last round of .303 British and was going back to camp to get something else with more ammo. I surprised a sitting Jack Rabbit, his back to me, at about 20 feet. Fired the .303 and the rabbit was gone, ran off. I thought I wasted my last round and proceeded walking only to find the bunny shot right through the shoulder blades where I aimed. He ran 15 maybe 20 feet out of sight.
Now, we all know that a .303 British round is more than enough for a rabbit, but he did not STOP right then and there. What make bullets work or not work are a mystery to me



If you broke both shoulder blades, how did the rabbit run? Your bullet may have thrown it that distance.

I once shot an anole lizard with a Hi-Std. 22 pistol with HP ammo and it disappeared. I was astounded, and found it, torn almost half in two, some 15-20 feet away. Either the bullet energy threw it that far or a spastic nerve reaction from the repitilian system let it run that far.

I suspect that you were using military ammo in the .303? Jackrabbits are tough, but this surprises me. Still, I've read about some weird things when bullets did or didn't perform as expected.
 
Last edited:
I own several 25 autos including two 950 B Berettas as well as two
950 Bs in 22 short. I have done some chronographing of various 25
auto 50 gr FMJ factory loads and there can be considerable differencies
in velocitys between brands. I have done penetration tests in wood
and wet newsprint with the 25 and 22 short and 22 LR from short
barreled revolvers. In similar barrel lengths the 25 is way ahead of the
22 LR penetration and the 22 short is not even in the running. Not to
start any disputes but I find stories about 25 FMJ bullets getting
stuck in pectoral muscles with no further penetration impossible to
believe. Jell tests show 25 FMJ penetration of 12"-13" and 32 FMJ
penetration of around 16"-18". In my own limited tests in wood good
32 FMJ ammo will slightly outpenetrate good 380 FMJ. As with any
handgun round shot placement is crucial but carrying a 25 with good
FMJ ammo is a long way from being unarmed.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top