How many use the lee dippers instead of a scale?

If you reload a scale is a necessity. I was using the Lee powder dippers as I found them accurate enough, and quicker than my RCBS Uniflow powder measure.

But, in winter the static electricity caused the powders to cling to the dipper and I had problems throwing the charges so I quit using them.
 
Wash them in dish detergent

If you reload a scale is a necessity. I was using the Lee powder dippers as I found them accurate enough, and quicker than my RCBS Uniflow powder measure.

But, in winter the static electricity caused the powders to cling to the dipper and I had problems throwing the charges so I quit using them.

Wash them in dish detergent and let them dry w/o rinsing the soapy water off. Voila. No static.

Some peeps wipe everything with clothes dryer sheets to keep static down.
 
I use dippers in conjunction with a scale. Checking any load that does not look or feel right. I have an old coffee mug which I dip from. I find that if the powder level in the mug changes dramatically my throws from the dippers will start changing. Dippers work fine, but you have to have a scale or you'll never know what you are really loading. These days I only go through a few hundred rounds a year, so weighing each load is not a big deal.
 
I use a Lee dipper to trickle the power into the scale pan. don't mess with them otherwise.
 
I'm an old reloader. When I was young, I watched my father (1950s), then when I got a little older (1960s) I worked and he watched. Every move like a hawk. By 1970 I was out on my own and loading. And I bought a set of the then Lee dippers and a Lyman scale. For most general shooting loads, the Lee dippers worked fine. I particularly like the smallest one listing 3.0 gr of Bullseye. It became my standard go to load for 38 wadcutters.

Someplace along the line I picked up a newer set of dippers. I don't recall that I've used them, but I don't care. There's no way I'd use dippers for anything even approaching maximum loads. But for mild play loads they work just fine. I'm not sure why all the hesitation here.

In my piles of junk I've got a couple of stand alone measures. Now the 2 sets of Lee dippers. And a few beam type scales, one new digital electronic and a very old chemistry balance beam. But if I'm loading light target loads, I use the dippers.

And I have a routine. I dip the powder and pour it in the case. Then I put the dipper down and pick up a bullet and start it by hand. Then into the press it goes. I will never charge more than one case at a time and then I always seat the bullet. I works for me and I'm not changing.
 
Wash them in dish detergent and let them dry w/o rinsing the soapy water off. Voila. No static.

Some peeps wipe everything with clothes dryer sheets to keep static down.

Appreciate that, but it did not work in my case. I do not know why because your assistance is "conventional wisdom". But the measure still had powder "clunging/clinging" to them.

I use them for loading my blackpowder handgun cartridges.
 
I use the Lee dippers sometimes when I load a few rounds to try, but I do check every 10'th round with the scale. These dippers are accurate as long as you always dip in a consistant way.

I believe these cartridges were .32 H&R mag.....
 
Cabelas had Hodgdon Tightgroup in stock. Looks like I need 3.9 grains starting and the .3 dipper is 3.5grains so too small already and I read in a lot of places that they are actually calibrated a little low. So scale is on order. I'm betting if they had a .4cc dipper it would be about right as the .5 is too big. I may take a cartridge and make one like I saw on many forums.

My range is 250 miles away so I want to keep a small minimal setup that I can carry there easily. Right now everything fits in a plastic ammo box.
 
Last edited:
I use them from time to time and I've got probably 6 or 7 scales. The things are actually fairly accurate. I would never use them for top end loads, for working up a load or plinking ammo they're fine.
 
Nothing wrong with using the dippers. I'm not convinced that weight measured powder charges are more accurate than volume measured powder charges.

Without the scale, however, you won't know for sure where you are with the dipper. The info Lee provides with them and reality isn't always the same.
 
Cabelas had Hodgdon Tightgroup in stock. Looks like I need 3.9 grains starting and the .3 dipper is 3.5grains so too small already and I read in a lot of places that they are actually calibrated a little low. So scale is on order. I'm betting if they had a .4cc dipper it would be about right as the .5 is too big. I may take a cartridge and make one like I saw on many forums.

My range is 250 miles away so I want to keep a small minimal setup that I can carry there easily. Right now everything fits in a plastic ammo box.
And there is the issue with dippers. "About right" & uberfast powders are a disaster waiting to happen, unless you never go past midrange loads. A good measure, faster & more accurate. No way one can accurately dip powder faster than a good measure throwing dead on charge wts.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top