Bozz10mm
US Veteran
For years I felt like I over paid for my brand new 1006 back in '93. It was $535 OTD. I don't feel that way any more.
For years I felt like I over paid for my brand new 1006 back in '93. It was $535 OTD. I don't feel that way any more.
Everything in Outrider's last two posts is about as contrary to common sense when using a firearm as possible.
"Thumb cocking" a firearm is not only a fine motor skill but one with "a little practice and dexterity" you are sure to forget in a highly stressful self defense situation.
The idea that while taking fire or presented with a life and death situation that you will have the presence of mind to cock the hammer back is more than a little bit suspect. I have never seen anyone advocate cocking the hammer before shooting on a DA/SA gun. This, to me, is like carrying without one in the pipe because it "just takes a second" to rack the slide and load a round in the chamber. That second may be the last you have and I certainly don't want to spend it wishing that I had a round already loaded.
In addition, the heavier trigger pull (what S&W has a 12 pound DA trigger pull?) of about 8-10 pounds is NOT a substitute for good firearms safety. You cannot and SHOULD NOT rest your finger on the trigger if the hammer is down. Keep your finger indexed and off the trigger until ready to fire. Advocating using a longer/heavier trigger pull to prevent a negligent discharge is just asking to shoot yourself, shoot someone else or pop off a round when you pick-up something that doesn't have that trigger pull.
If the shooter is so concerned about a consistent trigger pull then there are a myriad of platforms that offer just that, be it an M&P, Glock, XD, H&K, Walther PPQ, Sig DAK (as they advertise without using the first reset) or Smith 3rd Gen DAOs. I'm sure that I have forgotten some in my list.
Adding additional steps to the manual of arms of a self-defense weapon is just something else that can go wrong when you are fighting for your life or someone else's life. Put the front sight on the target, maintain good sight picture and a steady press to the rear.
/end rant
Your post is well written and reads like a text book...but most of us will never have the level of training or experience required to perform predictably in an emergency, just isn't realistic. We are mostly enthusiasts whose chosen hobby has a self defense benefit. I have a lifetime of firearm use as well as some military training but would never kid myself into thinking I am qualified to be in a firefight...I would do the best I could without having ever done it before. Most LEO's have little or no experience in a live situation and they look for trouble for a living!
My point is that I didn't read Outrider's post in the light you obviously did. I'm not going to take it point by point but I see some "common sense" realities in it that while they may not be "textbook" correct they recognize tendencies and probabilities. Your post is fine but I would be careful about insulting someone's "common sense" as you put it...no need to get personal.![]()
Now don't get defensive on me as it's JMHO and I'm welcome to it!![]()
You misread EVERYTHING I said...so much so that I'm embarrassed for you...
[snip]
Special considerations apply to Smith 3rd Gens. Whether you're aware of it or not, S&W reps trained LEOs worried about Smith's magazine disconnector under "stress reloads" in a method where an officer -- in an emergency -- can override the disconnect.
I promised I'd never reveal the technique, but it involves a method Smith considers safe on their 3rd Gen pistols with disconnectors, but one which would probably flip you out -- if I disclosed it and if you don't know it already.
It's scary, actually -- but Smith still to this day considers it safe.
[snip]