Smithsrevenge
Member
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2013
- Messages
- 817
- Reaction score
- 889
What I want to know. How do his hands look. OUCH!. I thought my Kaboom was bad, hell the slide never blew, just the barrel and frame.......thats a big explosion right there :/
What I want to know. How do his hands look. OUCH!. I thought my Kaboom was bad, hell the slide never blew, just the barrel and frame.......thats a big explosion right there :/
You are making the very common error of applying rifle loading procedures to handguns. Read your manuals again.
I will add that if you get sticky extraction from a bolt action rifle, you are way over pressure (over 65,000 psi?). If you are getting it in a handgun, those loads are flat out hazardous. In this case, the shooter in the OP was shooting the loads in a semi-auto pistol, so he had no way to determine what the extraction was like.
Case head expansion only applies to new cases, and only comes into play, again, at rifle pressures. If you are getting those indications in a pistol or revolver, you are WAY over pressure.
"Reading primers"? Don't even get me started!
When I first started re-loading I wrecked a brand new Model 19. I followed the data on the old (and foolishly high) Speer manual, all while watching carefully for "signs of pressure", as advised in the manual. By the time I noticed them, the forcing cone on my gun was split and the cylinder bulged.
There is no reliable, objective method to determine pressure for the typical handgun re-loader, and it chaps my --- to see the constant admonitions to "watch for pressure signs" in regard to pistols and revolvers. There are no indications until you are way over the line.
Get your data from a reliable source and adhere to it closely, including overall cartridge length. Get a chronograph, and if you are getting higher speeds than factory ammo, you are over pressure.
The gun didn't blow. The recoil was just too much for him to hold onto. That video has been on the net for quite some time now, and gets talked about on most gun boards.
What I want to know. How do his hands look. OUCH!. I thought my Kaboom was bad, hell the slide never blew, just the barrel and frame.......thats a big explosion right there :/
... Poor me, jes an ignernt loder dat cant figger pressures...
This is a very good point & observations like this are how wildcaters start to develope handloads. Using a larger case w/ smaller bore & heavier bullet is not a direct comparison, but it should have given pause to the guy just cramming 13gr into a 45acp case. Unique compresses well in certain loads, like 9mm, but then it's running almost 100% higher pressures.That is an absurd amount of Unique more than I would use in a 44 magnum load! Better off with a slower powder to achieve his desired velocity.
A friend passed this one along...his acquaintance was working up a .460 Rowland load using Unique. He did not have a single published load with this powder, so went on his own. The frame and slide are from a Glock 21 with a .460 Rowland conversion. Here is what 13 grains of Unique can do:
![]()
I ran the load through my Quickload software, but used .45 ACP as there is no Rowland data in this program. In a .45 ACP case with a 230 grain FMJ, 13 grains of Unique generate over 111,000 PSI! Now the Rowland case is 1/16th inch longer and dimensionally different, but not that different.
Word to the wise...use published loads.
Clark Custom Guns does the conversions and also has some loading data, but none with Unique! 460 Rowland Reloading Data Chart Information
The max pressure is 40,000 cup, but that isn't SAAMI pressure.
. . . and the direction of flight, tooAll very interesting, but how many of you are really more interested in what the velocity of the bullet was?
So this it actually 3rd hand information? Can it be verified because I'm thinking 111,000 PSI would do a lot more damage to any handgun than we see there.
Mind you, in a .460 Rowland the pressure would be different as the case dimensions are different, but not by a huge margin. The pressure would be less than in a .45 ACP case, but I can't imagine it would be tremendously different...even at 50% of this PSI it would be too hot.
Dropping to 12 grains the pressure drops to 86,000 psi. (again, .45 ACP case)
I've got the forwarded e-mail from the original experimenter, so third hand yes, but original info. I also wonder if his metering was off...a 1 grain difference is ~25,000 psi at that level (according to Quickload) in a .45 ACP. Quite a difference there.
Same case cpacity. Same pressure.
That is an absurd amount of Unique more than I would use in a 44 magnum load! Better off with a slower powder to achieve his desired velocity.