Is it a hoster? need help identifying it

Bmlove

US Veteran
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Messages
98
Reaction score
17
Location
Austin, Texas
hoster1.jpg

hoster5.jpg

hoster4.jpg

hoster2.jpg

hoster3.jpg

The pictures above are of an IWB appendix type "Holster?" that a friend of mine uses for his glock 23. I really like it but cannot find it anywhere or even know if is a holster. Can anyone help me with identifying what this is. It really looks like a pouch but it holds a gun very well. I want to it for IWB carry of my .38 bodyguard. When my friend is wearing this "holster' you don't know it at all. thanks all. By the way, it appears to be canvas in material and is made in Mexico.
 
Register to hide this ad
I guess it would work OK, but I would never recommend a "holster" like that. Once the gun is removed, it would require two hands to put it back. This is a quality that makes the "holster" unusable for me for carry. It must allow one hand reholstering.

Also, it looks like it would be very difficult to draw from that holster.

There are too many good quality holsters on the market to go looking for some cheap alternative.
 
I guess it would work OK, but I would never recommend a "holster" like that. Once the gun is removed, it would require two hands to put it back. This is a quality that makes the "holster" unusable for me for carry. It must allow one hand reholstering.

Also, it looks like it would be very difficult to draw from that holster.

There are too many good quality holsters on the market to go looking for some cheap alternative.

While I agree with you, the whole idea for my friend was that it cannot be seen or felt. He carries over his left abdomen and he is right handed. So for him it is a "fairly" easy draw. And yes he has to use two hands to put his weapon back in, but he is ok with that. We're mainly trying to identify what it really is because he wants another one and for the price he paid (cheap) it has worked for him and I'm willing to give it a try. I have a nice owb for my 38 that I like but it does print. Not much but I just can't get used to it. Paid 60$ for it. Do appreciate your input. This forum has always been good at providing me with great input. Thanks again.
 
Looks like some kind of tool/instrument pouch. Like the service technicians/AC/Phone/Internet guys might wear to carry their meter.

Maybe it's for the tools needed to service that automatic burrito making machine in Hollywood.


Sgt Lumpy
 
SsgtLumpy. - might be but the way it's built it is for inside the pants. There is a flap on the outside that fits over the belt and the gun or device sits deep inside the pocket. I don't know. Been looking online for anything that resembles it. Might be its not made anymore. It was bought at a gun show about 10 years ago. Thanks for your input.
 
That's a Law Concealment Systems Deep Cover Holster.

They are or were made in leather and cordura nylon, made to fit multiple handguns. They did make mag pouches that were very similar to the holster.

They are supposed to be very comfortable, once broken in.
 
Looks like the trigger could be pulled through the material?
 
That's a Law Concealment Systems Deep Cover Holster.

They are or were made in leather and cordura nylon, made to fit multiple handguns. They did make mag pouches that were very similar to the holster.

They are supposed to be very comfortable, once broken in.

That's it! Thanks. Now to try and get one. Lol. My searches are coming up nil for now. Did send an email to last known contact. Sure would like to get one. Thanks.
 
Looks like some kind of tool/instrument pouch...

Maybe it's for the tools needed to service that automatic burrito making machine in Hollywood.

... might be but the way it's built it is for inside the pants.

Undercover burrito machine tool carrier. Because they don't allow open carry of burrito tools in LA.


Sgt Lumpy
 
I guess it would work OK, but I would never recommend a "holster" like that. Once the gun is removed, it would require two hands to put it back. This is a quality that makes the "holster" unusable for me for carry. It must allow one hand reholstering. ....

I'm curious why you must be able to re-holster using just one hand. I can see a LEO needing to holster his piece while keeping a hand on a suspect, but I see no big disadvantage in two-handed holstering for civilians.
I carry A-IWB with a soft glove-leather Ace Case holster. It requires both hands for holstering the gun, but I don't mind since it is by far the most comfortable holster I've ever tried for this application.
I've been using an Ace Case size B IWB holster with my 2" Chiefs for about a year and a half with perfect satisfaction, and just bought a size A holster for my LCP & like it a lot so far.
 
I'm curious why you must be able to re-holster using just one hand. I can see a LEO needing to holster his piece while keeping a hand on a suspect, but I see no big disadvantage in two-handed holstering for civilians.
It's a good question. The short answer is the same reasons a cop might need to. However, there's a safety aspect as well.

If you have to use two hands when reholstering it will put your support hand in front of the muzzle. That's bad. Even if you were able to do it without covering your support hand with the muzzle, how do you keep your concealment garment out of the way as you reholster?

I could go on and on, but there's no point. The benefits of being able to reholster one handed far outweigh the downside of two hand reholstering.

It's not my goal to try to change anyone's mind. I'm just trying to offer up a better way to do things based on a lot of combined experience and training from guys who have more experience than I. I understand the value of a comfortable holster. It just makes more sense to me to have a gun that's easily accessible than one that's super comfortable. If I wanted comfortable, I wouldn't carry. Carrying a gun is comforting, not necessarily comfortable.

This is why I'm an advocate of spending more to get a good holster and belt rather than try to save a few dollars. It's been my experience that $25 holsters are neither comfortable nor durable. Just because a belt is leather doesn't mean it's a good one for carry. So, a quality holster with a stiff belt is much more comfortable and therefore, makes a person more likely to carry. AND it will allow easy access to the gun when needed.

Also, any training school worth taking will require you to have a holster that stays open for one hand reholstering. You should seek training if you carry a gun.
 
Thanks adwjc? Saw that post the other day and used the email address on but have not heard back. I'm thinking the holster is no longer available. Will see what else I can find.
 
.......
If you have to use two hands when reholstering it will put your support hand in front of the muzzle. That's bad. Even if you were able to do it without covering your support hand with the muzzle, how do you keep your concealment garment out of the way as you reholster? ..........
I understand the value of a comfortable holster. It just makes more sense to me to have a gun that's easily accessible than one that's super comfortable. If I wanted comfortable, I wouldn't carry. Carrying a gun is comforting, not necessarily comfortable. .......

I don't have a problem with keeping my cover garment ut of the way when hlstering, or sweeping my off-hand with the muzzle. Both are non-issues for me. YMMV.
The Ace Case holster in the A-IWB position is for me both comfortable & very accessible. "Comforting not comfortable" is a catchy phrase, but IMHO the less comfortable a holster/gun combination is, the easier it is to rationalize yourself into not carrying it every day. The whole point of EDC to me is so when you need a gun you will have it on your person-- not in your car, and not locked in the gunsafe at home.
 
Comfort is certainly a factor, but access is more important to me. When I need the gun, I will need it quickly. If I can't present the gun and put two shots on target at 7 yards in under 2.4 seconds, then is it really helping me?

Like you said, everyone is different. Carry how you like. I was asked "why" and gave the answer; that's all.
 
Back
Top