The jury didn't get the evidence. Again-where is the background on this man that would lead anyone to say he is a sadistic murderer? Put yourself in his shoes-how would you feel-especially if you were a quiet keep to your self type person? What was his thought process after say...the second burglary? How about the 5th? what about while he was waiting for the ninth, after going through the 6th 7th and 8th. This man was the victim, and his actions as far as the recorders and plastic sheet, etc, underscore that he had been traumatized to the point where this obsessed his thoughts in his own home, every moment of his existence. Where is the expert testimony on his mental state? Oh, that's right, they couldn't introduce the "other burglary's" into evidence; what a sham. His friend was right, he is the victim here, and the statement by the "Sheriff" is an attempt to salve his own conscience. Hopefully someone will get a hold on all the facts of this case on appeal and see it tried in the light of all of the evidence, but this guy's going to have a rough road for whatever time he has left. Psychology may all be mumbo jumbo for some folks, but brain chemistry isn't, and it won't be when it is their turn to listen to everyone say what he "shoulda-coulda" done. Nuff' said.