Open Top or Retained Carry?

Peakes

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2013
Messages
552
Reaction score
1,008
Location
Big Sky Country
Just curious how many carry either way? I prefer Open tops, but have both.
 

Attachments

  • P9020038.jpg
    P9020038.jpg
    118.5 KB · Views: 148
Register to hide this ad
I have both. I won't usually use the strap/snap unless I am on a horse/atv or in really rough country. Most of my holsters are molded/boned to fit and the gun is not going to just pop loose during my normal day-to-day activities.
 
I like some kind of retainer, just makes me feel better and it's no big deal to release. I've got a jelly roll and I sure don't want it falling on the floor when I get up from a table at a restaurant!
 
I have both, but mostly, I use open top models. Until I bought my SD9VE, I never even considered a polymer/kydex holster; now I have 2 for the SD and 1 for my 1911!

All but a few have some type of tension adjustment to keep the gun secure.
 
I would think it would depend on the design of the holster. For example the first cheap blackhawk I bought dumped mine out when I bent over so I'd have preferred a retention strap on it. My current holster gripped the blue plastic test gun at the LGS tight enough that it slid out of my hand and across the counter when I first tried to pull it off (the holster, flew not the gun). It holds well enough to not need anything else.
 
If the leather is good, and the maker knows what he/she is doing, open top all the way.

My EDC rig is a Lobo Gunleather, open top.
 
Retaining your handgun adequately doesn't require a retention device other than a great fit.

Less expensive holsters are much more likely to require a secondary device (eg thumb break).

Good leather doesn't require secondary devices.

Buy top quality leather.

Every day I use a holster that's over 30 years old which retains my handgun just fine without a secondary device.

Of course, I use only DelFatti or Milt Sparks leather.

Pricy and a long wait, but well worth the money and wait time.

Spend the money and get in line: you'll be happy you did.
 
I think it's really dependent on each individual person, and their activity level. I have several nice open top holsters, and I use them, and I like them, but they primarily get used when I am very certain I'm just going to be walking around the house, or in the truck, etc.

Mostly I favor a thumb snap, I'm outdoors a lot and around the farm a lot and don't wanna be worried about my gun flopping on the ground all the time.
 
When the 469 first hit the market I had to have one. Off-the shelf holsters of any type were scarce, so I had a Bianchi Shadow for a 59 cut down. Our coroner (R.I.P Doc) had been demonstrating how well his Milt Sparks Summer Special retained his Browning High Power by standing on his head, so I ordered one. Used it for about a week. Then one night I bailed out of my car to assist a patrol officer who was trying to subdue a fighting drunk. When we got him under control I realized my gun was missing. The butt had become wedged in the split in my car's 60/40 seat and had neatly drawn itself when I jumped out.
 
I suppose carrying for duty vs carrying concealed for self defense would have different holster needs.

If I knew I might possibly get into physical altercations with others, resulting in wrestling around on the ground or otherwise, I think I would like the extra security of positive retention.

Generally, I am more "relaxed" in my day to day activities. A quality open top holster works perfectly for my needs.
 
I suppose carrying for duty vs carrying concealed for self defense would have different holster needs.

Pretty much. If it's being carried open wether for duty or not, without added retention it's pretty easy for someone to take off of you. If it's concealed, no one should know it's there.

IMO a thumb break is too obvious when open carrying, but that really is just an opinion.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top