Now an LEO is charged with murder here...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Anyone have a link to an unedited version of the video. I've tried watching what the news puts up but they butcher it so badly I now know less than I did.
 
Anyone have a link to an unedited version of the video. I've tried watching what the news puts up but they butcher it so badly I now know less than I did.

You need to see the one where the cop handcuffs him and then runs back to pick up his taser to plant it near the dead guy, right there the cop new he was "DEAD" wrong, I'm sure he never thought he was being filmed.
 
This one is unedited. [ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fg3GrfR2wiQ[/ame]
 
You need to see the one where the cop handcuffs him and then runs back to pick up his taser to plant it near the dead guy, right there the cop new he was "DEAD" wrong, I'm sure he never thought he was being filmed.

That's exactly the way it looks. I wonder how many LEO shootings like like this occur that weren't filmed and never questioned.
 
That's exactly the way it looks. I wonder how many LEO shootings like like this occur that weren't filmed and never questioned.

Watching that video multiple times the guy never had the taser, the cop flips it behind himself then shoots the man dead, handcuffs him runs back to retrieve the taser to plant it by the dead man, really how does anyone defend that ?
 
I will always try to support the position of any LEO involved in an altercation however I cannot do so in this case based solely on the video I have reviewed.

In as much as the actual shooting doesn't appear to be in any self defense capacity I am troubled by the apparent rush to pick up an object only to drop it near the victim. NOTHING at the scene should have been disturbed unless it was to secure a dangerous condition. The technicians will photograph and document the most minute detail.

While I can't tell for sure that it was the officers taser, later on in the video while standing near the victim he does pick something up off the ground and appears to return it to his duty belt; where his taser would have been holstered...

Although we don't see events prior to the shooting even if the object picked up was a weapon carried by the victim-unlikely as it still should not have been moved from where it was dropped-the post shooting actions of the officer cannot in any way justify the actual shooting.

Unless there's something we don't yet know it would seem that the charge is appropriate. His Chief seems to have came to the same conclusion almost immediately and he at least would know more than we do.
 
There just may be something to it as the New's just said the Officer has been arrested without Bond.
Maybe for His safety or maybe They think He did Murder the Guy.
 
This could be why the lawyer that initially represented the officer has now resigned as his counsel. Lying to your lawyer is not only stupid, it's a cardinal sin.

I learned long ago, back in the 1980s when I was a union shop steward, that there is nothing more embarrassing than having the person you are representing lie to you about what happened. It makes it very easy for the other side to make you look the fool and make your client look even more guilty.

It's even worse when you are a lawyer and your client is facing life in prison or worse.

There might be things that the officer could say to mitigate the circumstances, but they are all undermined if he lied in his statements to his attorney.

Watching that video multiple times the guy never had the taser, the cop flips it behind himself then shoots the man dead, handcuffs him runs back to retrieve the taser to plant it by the dead man, really how does anyone defend that ?
 
This soon-to-be ex-cop is history. He threw his own life away in the approximately three seconds it took to fire those eight shots into the back of a man running away.

I wonder if all eight shots hit the guy? And if not, wonder where those bullets went?
 
I think it might well be a justifiable shooting under the Garner standard, as the fleeing man qualified as a danger to the community. In fact, I think it a politicized tragedy that the officer has been treated this way.

The fleeing guy fought the officer, resisted him, fought off being Tazed, and then stole the officer's Tazer and had it in hand while fleeing initially.

As for eight times being shot, well you shoot as many times as you need to.

If the guy had not attacked the policeman, fought him, and stole his Tazer and then fled..he would not have been shot. The bad thing is not that a criminal was killed, but in the way the policeman is being treated and villified in the media.

I disagree. I watched the video with a former LEO. Watch the officers actions. He shoots the runner in the back, runs up and handcuffs him. He then runs back to where the tazer was dropped at the site of the original fight dozens of feet away. He then runs back to the prone and cuffed perp and drops the tazer. He then kneels down and picks up the tazer and holsters it.

A bad shooting and with the help of the video completely indefensible.
 
I think it might well be a justifiable shooting under the Garner standard...

If the guy had not attacked the policeman, fought him, and stole his Tazer and then fled..he would not have been shot. The bad thing is not that a criminal was killed, but in the way the policeman is being treated and villified in the media.

As I read that I was thinking that it is the most bizarre thing I have ever seen you write - in quite a few years. :confused:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top