Very satisfied new Taurus owner.

I just got back from the indoor range with the new, discontinued Taurus PT-909. The 909 ran 250 rounds flawlessly! According to the Taurus haters, I must be the luckiest guy in the world since I have nine new Taurus semis that perform perfectly. Anyway, this target set at ~40', standing two hand hold, rapid fire.

121574d1435363006-brand-new-pt-909-range-performance-report-001.jpg
 
I think Taurus hit a homerun with the PT 111 G2. We had a new one at the range yesterday and it performed very impressively. Accurate, reliable, double strike if needed, simple and really affordable, not to mention , lifetime warranty.
Jim
 
This early 1990's model PT92 9mm (no de-cocker) is the only Taurus I've owned. Looks good and functions great...a keeper.

I like the Mec-Gar 18 round mags that are available for it.

Rocking some Hogue wood...
411491719.jpg
 
I've owned 12 Taurus revolvers and autos since 1991.
None have ever had a single problem or malfunction.
Most of them, I've shot the ever loving hell out of, some I haven't.
My 1994 Model 44 has a smoother action than ANY S&W non-PC revolver.
I wouldn't have believed it if it weren't mine.
It shouldn't have a better action, since it's all coil spring/plunger, instead of leaf spring and coil spring/rebound block.

But, it does.
Of course, that is because that model had factory hand fitted/smoothed actions at the time.

Can i shoot hundreds of thousands of rounds through them without wearing them out? Dunno.
Can i afford to shoot hundreds of thousands of rounds through them? Not even with the cost savings of reloading.
 
Last edited:
Apparently...

Apparently their semi autos are nothing like their revolvers. That's a good thing. Guns and Ammo just did some EXTENSIVE testing of Ruger, Sig, Kahr, S&W, Glock and few more compact pistols. The Taurus was the surprise value. They tested flawlessly throughout the test and even went beyond. Nobody in the group was expecting that.
 
Last edited:
I've owned more of their revolvers than their autos, and had no trouble with them.

Would I rather have a Taurus revolver over a Smith revolver, given a perfect specimen of both?
No.
Except for my M44 vs a 629. It's just so smooth and the comp makes it fun to shoot hot magnum rounds. The extra barrel weight helps, too.
I can't remember ever enjoying running hot magnums through a 29/629.

Would I pay the same price for the M44 as I would for a 29/629?
No freaking way.

Would I like to have my 431 back?
Yes.
Would I trade any of my Smith revolvers for an equivalent Taurus model? Uh, no.

Confused yet?
 
Last edited:
Somebody's gotta buy'em, but I don't think anyone would if price was not factor.
 
Last edited:
Somebody's gotta buy'em, but I don't think anyone would if price was not factor.

People like me buy them. Bring an Economics major, I have always done a cost/benefit analysis on everything I buy. Being the cheapskate I am, I retired debt free 12 years ago at 55. You simply buy the most affordable product that will do the job you buy it for. I could find no reason to pay 50% more for a S&W or Ruger when my Taurus TCP does the same or better. My 70s era Taurus 38 Special revolver inspired me to buy a new Taurus.

My FBI agent friend and son-in-law tried to get me to buy a Glock. Instead, I bought a S&W SD9VE and a Taurus TCP for less than the cost of a Glock.

Only gun snobs will pay extra for the name.
 
Last edited:
I have had 3 Taurus built guns.
A bobbed hammer DAO M605 revolver in 357
A first gen PT111 9mm auto
A TCP PT738 380 auto
All have been completely reliable and eaten everything I fed them without issue.
 
Last edited:
nice to see Taurus getting some good reviews..I've owned a 24/7 .45 for about 7 years and it's been a problem child since about day 1. Its actually in the process of being replaced by Taurus with the newest version the 24/7 G2 .45. It'll be interesting to see how this one compares.
 
People like me buy them. Bring an Economics major, I have always done a cost/benefit analysis on everything I buy. Being the cheapskate I am, I retired debt free 12 years ago at 55. You simply buy the most affordable product that will do the job you buy it for. I could find no reason to pay 50% more for a S&W or Ruger when my Taurus TCP does the same or better. My 70s era Taurus 38 Special revolver inspired me to buy a new Taurus.

My FBI agent friend and son-in-law tried to get me to buy a Glock. Instead, I bought a S&W SD9VE and a Taurus TCP for less than the cost of a Glock.

Only gun snobs will pay extra for the name.

We all buy things for different reasons, and with different criteria. As collector, I buy for shooting and collecting, and I think as an "economics major" even you would agree that any of my Colt or S&W revolvers from the 70's and earlier have way more value than your Taurus from that era. I think your reasons for buying are fine for you, but you seem to be angry and at the same time feel superior to people who don't share your view. To my way of thinking you're the snob here. Self-deprivation is fine, but it's a shame never know the pride of ownership and the joy of shooting a fine old model 27 or Python. Good luck.
 
Last edited:
I've owned a number of Taurus revolvers over the years, but only one of which I fired a lot. That one was the first one, a Taurus 82, that I shot the snot out of with wadcutter loads. That thing was great. That was in the early 80's and I bought that one, and only that one, NIB.

The rest have been purchased used. I can't say I shot any of the others a lot, but not because they didn't work well, just for one reason or another I sold or traded them off to get something else. A couple of them, especially a Model 65 and a 66, I would have put up against any Model 13/19 I've ever owned for shootability and appearance. They were both nice looking guns that shot just fine in limited shooting.

The Model 94/96, 22's I had were nice also. The finish wasn't pretty as others, but they were more of a matte finish anyway.

All I've owned have been "older" models. Older being defined as "ones with wooden grips." I think they stopped those sometime in the early/mid 90's. I don't know much about the ones with rubber grips. I've also never owned a Taurus semi-auto, so I can't say anything about them.

Just a couple of days ago, I put a Taurus 431, 44 Special on lay-a-way. Nice looking gun, a sort of K/L frame size, 3" barrel, five shot, fixed sight, 44 Special. The price was just too good to pass up, and from what I've read, they seem to be almost universally liked. I'm looking forward to getting it out of hock in a few weeks.

crappy cell phone pictures.





I'm not going to carry it. I'm not going to try to turn it into a 44 magnum. It's to be a range toy only. It checked out mechanically, same as I'd check out a S&W. If I have trouble with it, I'll either fix it, sell it, trade it, or just keep it and have a good laugh at myself.
 
I hate to tell you this but Taurus has drastically improved their quality. Heck I was never a Taurus fan but lately they have got me thinking of getting one. I have sold a few Taurus handguns and nothing but great feedback from them.
 
I hate to tell you this but Taurus has drastically improved their quality. Heck I was never a Taurus fan but lately they have got me thinking of getting one. I have sold a few Taurus handguns and nothing but great feedback from them.

That's why I started this thread. I only wanted to express my positive experience and opinion on a numerous sampling of new 2013, 2014 and 2015 Taurus semis that I purchased over the past year. The first purchase lead to the next purchase and so on. My current Taurus inventory includes 2-PT111 G2's, 2-PT140 G2's, PT809, PT809c, PT92AFS, PT-911 and PT909. All of them have performed well. I have no hands on experience with any other Taurus models, so I won't recommend something I don't own.
 
I owned a 92c in the mid 90's.It was a very good gun and it never malfunctioned once and I would have kept but something else came along and it was traded off with some cash for a S&W 625
 
I Decided to expand My Gun Knowledge and experiment with other brands. I'm not disappointed at all. sub 300 dollar price and I cut the very center of the bulls eye out the second shot at 30 feet. trigger is different but not something that can't be overcome.

I don't think I'll be selling my Colt's or Smiths. But I like the Taurus just fine.

Taurus%20PT140%20G2JPG.jpg
 
I love satisfied Taurus owners. Don't beat them down and make
them feel bad. Just keeps more people out of the market forS&W
and other real guns. Tell them about Rossi and Hi-points they
should have choices to be fair!
 
I love satisfied Taurus owners. Don't beat them down and make
them feel bad. Just keeps more people out of the market forS&W
and other real guns. Tell them about Rossi and Hi-points they
should have choices to be fair!

Wow, thank you, that really enlightened every forum member.
 
I owned a 92c in the mid 90's never had an issue with it but I traded it and cash for a 5" 625.
 
I love satisfied Taurus owners. Don't beat them down and make
them feel bad. Just keeps more people out of the market forS&W
and other real guns. Tell them about Rossi and Hi-points they
should have choices to be fair!

Oh, don't count on that. I've never let the fact that I occasionally buy a Taurus, or even a Hi-Point, stop me from buying Smith & Wesson's. :D
 
Back
Top