HOUSTON RICK
Member
I am looking at the Springfield M1A in .308. Any reviews from owners? How difficult is it to clean? Wood vs Plastic Stock? Any systematic problems? Thank you in advance.
Springfield M1A
- Thread starter HOUSTON RICK
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
Backlighting
Member
Trained with one while in the Army.
Wish I had one now. My favorite rifle.
Easy to disassemble & clean. Replacement parts plentiful.
Potent.
Check out Hickok45's review:
[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_0hW0p5Nfg&spfreload=10&hd=1[/ame]
Wish I had one now. My favorite rifle.
Easy to disassemble & clean. Replacement parts plentiful.
Potent.
Check out Hickok45's review:
[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_0hW0p5Nfg&spfreload=10&hd=1[/ame]
Have you checked out the M14 forum?? They got all the info you need.
I own one, but haven't made use of of yet (I've bought a number of military parts to replace the made in Taiwan parts, and have an Enhanced Battle Rifle (EBR) stock for it, just waiting to find a good M1A/M14 gunsmith to do the work for me).
I have fired, owned and cleaned an AR and an AK for a number of years, and I do know the M1A is a design that is a generation or two older than these. I believe this is why the AR style .308's are taking off so well right now.
I do know lots of guys DO NOT like the current plastic stocks of the Springfield Armory Inc. M1A's, so I'd suggest you stay away from those.
The M1A is a classic design though, and even with the new production models that Springfield is putting out, you can get a fine rifle with a lot more character than a "Black Rifle" .308
Hope this helps.
I own one, but haven't made use of of yet (I've bought a number of military parts to replace the made in Taiwan parts, and have an Enhanced Battle Rifle (EBR) stock for it, just waiting to find a good M1A/M14 gunsmith to do the work for me).
I have fired, owned and cleaned an AR and an AK for a number of years, and I do know the M1A is a design that is a generation or two older than these. I believe this is why the AR style .308's are taking off so well right now.
I do know lots of guys DO NOT like the current plastic stocks of the Springfield Armory Inc. M1A's, so I'd suggest you stay away from those.
The M1A is a classic design though, and even with the new production models that Springfield is putting out, you can get a fine rifle with a lot more character than a "Black Rifle" .308
Hope this helps.
Last edited:
Collo Rosso
Member
A couple of years ago I did a trade and came home with a M1a. It came with a laminated Boyd's stock that I found awkward to shoot having a huge wrist to it. Replaced it with a birch M14 stock from Fred's and like that much better. It's weight and being semi-auto make it soft shooting. I'm told they're very accurate but can't vouch for it as I'm a pretty poor shot with a rifle. There's a couple of tricks to cleaning it. Youtube has some excellent videos on the subject. I like it and my AR would definitely go before the M1a.
On the subject of owning a AR and a M1a, a ex-Marine friend of mine told me " I want to shoot a M14, I want to carry a M16". I now know what he means.
On the subject of owning a AR and a M1a, a ex-Marine friend of mine told me " I want to shoot a M14, I want to carry a M16". I now know what he means.
Engine49guy
Member
The M14/M1A is my personal favorite battle rifle bar none.
IMO you cannot compare an M1A to an AR15 as they are two different beasts that do not supplant eachother as much as supplement eachother.
As stated the M16 platform is a lighter weapon system firing smaller lighter ammo which is usefull at closer ranges and high volume firefights where the M14 platform is the more powerful and accurate system especially when enhanced by optical systems at longer ranges.
IMO its kinda like comparing a .38 snub Airweight to a .44 Mag ... each has its own advantages,
Bottom line IMO is the M16 can carry 3X more ammo for urban warfare and spray N pray shooters where the .308 needs just one well placed shot from a trained marksman and his spotter.
IMO you cannot compare an M1A to an AR15 as they are two different beasts that do not supplant eachother as much as supplement eachother.
As stated the M16 platform is a lighter weapon system firing smaller lighter ammo which is usefull at closer ranges and high volume firefights where the M14 platform is the more powerful and accurate system especially when enhanced by optical systems at longer ranges.
IMO its kinda like comparing a .38 snub Airweight to a .44 Mag ... each has its own advantages,
Bottom line IMO is the M16 can carry 3X more ammo for urban warfare and spray N pray shooters where the .308 needs just one well placed shot from a trained marksman and his spotter.
GatorFarmer
Member
I won a contest and bought one along with 13 x 20 rd mags and all the accessories when I was in college. I kept it around until 2004 or 2005. It was not particularly accurate, heavy, and prone to catch on things.
Engine49guy
Member
I suppose while there are different variations of the M1A/M14 with different levels of performance inaccurate examples exist in all wepaons platforms although IMO the M1A/M14 has a general reputation of being a very accurate and dependable platform when the shooter does his part.
The larger cartridge does seem to assist in its superior performance at distance when compared to the smaller 5.56 mm arms.
The larger cartridge does seem to assist in its superior performance at distance when compared to the smaller 5.56 mm arms.
I have a SA M1A and also a LRB M14. Both are great rifles. The M1A is all GI except for the operating rod and the LRB is all GI except for the barrel.
Cleaning is similar to any other rifle except for the gas cylinder. I have a set of handled drill bits especially for the piston cleaning.
To remove the operating rod, I can only say you often have to hold your mouth just right for it to come off��
Cleaning is similar to any other rifle except for the gas cylinder. I have a set of handled drill bits especially for the piston cleaning.
To remove the operating rod, I can only say you often have to hold your mouth just right for it to come off��
As a match shooter in NRA High Power Rifle matches (Service Rifle) I have worn out 5 barrels in mine...a good fiberglass stock works very well, but I still prefer a good wood stock on it.
The biggest problems with an M14/M1A format is that they are addicting! Mine is currently running an Obermeyer 5R barrel and with iron sights and my replicant of M852 ammo it will put 20 rounds into about 2" group at 200 yards over a rest.
I haven't fired it on the 600 yard line yet, but would expect it to stay around a 1 minute or so gun back that far with quality ammo.
This format needs to have some special care given to any reloading and the means to measure a number of things like a head spacing micrometer, case gauge, and powder of the right burn rate (IMR 4895 and very similar) otherwise you end up with bent op. rods....they are not cheap anymore...
Did I mention that they are addicting? Probably the softest shooting .308/7.62 NATO cartridge in the industry....
Some will say that there is no way and auto loader with compete with a bolt gun.....they forgot to tell MY rifle that it cannot compete!!
Randy
PS. Get one and have a blast!!
The biggest problems with an M14/M1A format is that they are addicting! Mine is currently running an Obermeyer 5R barrel and with iron sights and my replicant of M852 ammo it will put 20 rounds into about 2" group at 200 yards over a rest.
I haven't fired it on the 600 yard line yet, but would expect it to stay around a 1 minute or so gun back that far with quality ammo.
This format needs to have some special care given to any reloading and the means to measure a number of things like a head spacing micrometer, case gauge, and powder of the right burn rate (IMR 4895 and very similar) otherwise you end up with bent op. rods....they are not cheap anymore...
Did I mention that they are addicting? Probably the softest shooting .308/7.62 NATO cartridge in the industry....
Some will say that there is no way and auto loader with compete with a bolt gun.....they forgot to tell MY rifle that it cannot compete!!
Randy
PS. Get one and have a blast!!
Had one 50 years ago, but Uncle Sam wanted it back when I came home. Great rifle.
I've owned numerous M1A style rifles; SA Inc., Fed Ord, Norinco/Poly Tech, etc, etc. and even an NFA Class 3 re-weld. I would like to try an LRB sometime.
IMO, down side is it's not as easy or cheap to scope. I do like the gun and find it fun to shoot though. And even with all the options available, (some work better than others in my opinion) eg; Sadlak mount or Troy sopmod rail system if scoping to Sage EBR chassis/stock, which are all quality enhancements IMO. I still prefer a nice oil finished walnut stock. I also prefer the full-length rifle or shorter scout/squad to the 16" socom version.
ETA:
IMO, if wanting to go old school cool, outfit a full-size rifle with an E2 stock and M2 bipod to have an early type SAW copy.
ETA again:
Who remembers the Ruger XGI? Basically a mini 14 grown to M14 size and chambered in 308
IMO, down side is it's not as easy or cheap to scope. I do like the gun and find it fun to shoot though. And even with all the options available, (some work better than others in my opinion) eg; Sadlak mount or Troy sopmod rail system if scoping to Sage EBR chassis/stock, which are all quality enhancements IMO. I still prefer a nice oil finished walnut stock. I also prefer the full-length rifle or shorter scout/squad to the 16" socom version.
ETA:
IMO, if wanting to go old school cool, outfit a full-size rifle with an E2 stock and M2 bipod to have an early type SAW copy.
ETA again:
Who remembers the Ruger XGI? Basically a mini 14 grown to M14 size and chambered in 308
Last edited:
GatorFarmer
Member
If I remember correctly the rifle I had came with a little tag saying something along the lines of expect 3.5 MOA. Which is within spec for a service grade rifle off the rack, but may disappoint some users. The fine tuned rifles are likely better. Whether that comes at the price of reduced reliability, I do not know.
vonn
US Veteran
Started with one in the Army and still have one. Last of the wood and steel battle rifles. Modernized M1 Garand and very similar. You can pick up a Garand cheaper and once you learn how to load it,about the same rate of fire. Way more potent than AR's in 5.56.
Charlie Foxtrott
Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2009
- Messages
- 1,260
- Reaction score
- 2,112
have had one since 1993.
I have never had any sort of malfunction with it. Definitely not a match grade rifle. And It was tough and costly to get it set up properly for glass. Finally I got it set up pretty well though.
If I was going to do it all over again. I would likely do something different. There were not as many options in 1993 as there are now.
I have never had any sort of malfunction with it. Definitely not a match grade rifle. And It was tough and costly to get it set up properly for glass. Finally I got it set up pretty well though.
If I was going to do it all over again. I would likely do something different. There were not as many options in 1993 as there are now.
Attachments
Bob R
US Veteran
I suppose while there are different variations of the M1A/M14 with different levels of performance inaccurate examples exist in all wepaons platforms although IMO the M1A/M14 has a general reputation of being a very accurate and dependable platform when the shooter does his part.
The larger cartridge does seem to assist in its superior performance at distance when compared to the smaller 5.56 mm arms.
Between us, with overlapping fields of fire, we could own the night!!
IDF Sniper version, very neat story behind this particular run of M1As. Maybe I'll tell it sometime.
With a 6x scope on mine I can shoot under MOA all day long using Hirtenberger surplus ammo.
Whle USGI parts are scarce and expensive there are plenty of aftermarket parts to do any upgrades you want on the rifle.
bob
getoff
Member
simply my favorite long gun i own. easy to clean, crazy reliable/durable, parts are everywhere, and 20 round box mags from checkmate industries are like 20 bucks. mine gets boring to shoot on steel at 500 yds. i have the scout in synthetic with a leupold 1.25-4x vrx patrol optic on it. love, love it. i also have a mini 14 with the long flash hider so it looks just like its big bro... do yourself a favor, if you're gonna mount an optic, get the sadlac mount.
Fishinfool
Member
Rick - I have owned two, a NM model, and a regular standard model, both w/wood stocks. Still have and plan on keeping the standard model, as it shoots about as well as the NM did.
Couple things. It is easy to clean the rifle and gas system. You can remove the action from the stock, but really shouldn't that often. It is a tight fit, and that is what contributes to accuracy in these rifles.
Factory Springfield magazines are expensive. Use Check Mate mags instead. They are the company that makes them for Springfield, and they sell at about half the price as the Springfield marked ones. Avoid others, as they usually don't work well.
Use a quality scope mount. I like and use the "SWAN" mount by ARMS. It is also the official military mount. SADAK, and a couple others also work well. The $69.00 aluminum ones don't.
A cheek pad, like pictured on mine helps when using a scope, as these stocks are not really designed for scopes.
My rifle is a solid one inch gun with ammo it likes, and has proven reliable with a wide variety of reloads, commericial, and surplus ammo. It is one of my favorite range rifles.
Larry
Couple things. It is easy to clean the rifle and gas system. You can remove the action from the stock, but really shouldn't that often. It is a tight fit, and that is what contributes to accuracy in these rifles.
Factory Springfield magazines are expensive. Use Check Mate mags instead. They are the company that makes them for Springfield, and they sell at about half the price as the Springfield marked ones. Avoid others, as they usually don't work well.
Use a quality scope mount. I like and use the "SWAN" mount by ARMS. It is also the official military mount. SADAK, and a couple others also work well. The $69.00 aluminum ones don't.
A cheek pad, like pictured on mine helps when using a scope, as these stocks are not really designed for scopes.
My rifle is a solid one inch gun with ammo it likes, and has proven reliable with a wide variety of reloads, commericial, and surplus ammo. It is one of my favorite range rifles.
Larry
Attachments
Last edited:
I bought the National Match some years ago. I like wood stocks. Bassett low mount for scope and Bradley cheek rest.
The iron sights are great as well.
Privi Partisan is good ball ammo.
My favorite rifle.
The iron sights are great as well.
Privi Partisan is good ball ammo.
My favorite rifle.
Similar threads
- Locked
