mrchuck
Member
This Winter, I have been carrying my Smith&Wesson Model 60 stainless 357 Magnum. Yes,,,a hand cannon.
I like the 3 feet of fire it blows out the barrel.
I like the 3 feet of fire it blows out the barrel.
. . . and speed strips have six holes, do you load five or six in the strip to slip in your pocket?
I would think snapping on an empty chamber then pulling again would be faster than trying to index the empty chamber.
As Ed Lovette points out 80% of the snubby is accuracy, 20% is reload. As Sykes points out most of combat accuracy is point shooting within 12 feet. Four positions in their system depending on distance.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Neither is optimal, I'm not sure you want to draw down and hear a click, unless you're training to just repeatedly pull the trigger (and yes, we trained to shoot until the threat was stopped, but generally we didn't just empty the gun.) That might be a sticking point in court. I guess it's a personal decision. I'm just saying reloading a partial cylinder and then trying to guess when your gun is going to fire doesn't seem like the answer. Like I said the "what if" game will always lead to semi autos with effective cartridges and multi round magazines.
Yeah my impression is that Lovette doubled the percentage of times needed for reload so that you would get plenty of practice20% seems high, considering the (presumed) percentage of times a reload is actually performed during a shooting.
Again the problem is is ergonomic combatives. Proportionally it's much much faster to load two load two close cylinder fire then it is to load two load two hunt for last hole close cylinder fire. Especially under life and death stress.Great point. FWIW, I'm in the "carry 5" category. Mostly because I don't want an empty weapon after having to use it.
I was just putting myself in the "carry 4" camp's shoes.
Fixed your post...Play the "what if" game long enough and you end up with a Ma Deuce...