A bill to remove supressors from the NFA

Lots of people buying those "Whisper" .308's where the rifle will only work with a can.
 
Just read that the Deputy Director of ATF has stated based on a "white paper" that suppressors should be removed from the NFA ACT of items banned without proper permitting. He has also indicated that import bans on "assault" weapons should also be lifted. I sense their is a New Sheriff in town.
 
I'm all for removing suppressors from the NFA but bringing in more Made In China marked items gets a thumbs down.

Balance the trade deficit first.
 
I have the entire white paper as a pdf file. Is it possible to load it onto the forum?
 
As it is right now cans are expensive, but I'm afraid if they become easier to buy that the price will go up because everyone will want one and they should sell well.

If they're removed from the NFA, you can make your own. Prices would then become more reasonable.
 
banned items

I'm all for removing suppressors from the NFA but bringing in more Made In China marked items gets a thumbs down.

Balance the trade deficit first.

I think you make an excellent point, however the part of the removal I most like is the ban on American made M1 Garands that were sold to Korea, Philipimes etc that importers attempted to bring back. A former Secretary of State and Presidential Candidate refused State Department approval for the re-importation back to this country.

I purchased a S&W model 15 that at one time belonged to the Hong Kong PD..... Now it was not a rifle and subject to the ban but could have been on the list had certain people been put into office.

So while I agree with your basic concept, lets make an exception for US made rifles once exported that we now want to import back into the country. I hope you agree!
 
If there was greater demand because of being non NFA, more companies would produce them and I firmly believe the prices would drop. Plus, the companies now making them have to make profits form low volume sales. If they could sell 10 times as many they could make more money with less mark up.

Lets say it cost $50 to make one for a 22. You sell 1000 for $200. 1000 x $150= $150,000. Or you sell 10,000 at $150
10,000x$100= $1,000,000.

With a good CNC setup they would be easy to produce in volume. Even a small shop with a under $100,000 machine producing enough parts to assemble an average of just 30 a day with a net of $50 per unit would keep a family well fed. The actual material cost are low, and with carbide or ceramic cutters in a coolant flooded machine the tooling cost wouldn't be bad either. Small shop space, shipping, and receiving cost would be low and payments on the machine. Say a $1500 a week. Buy the tubing bulk cut and thread the ends. Produce end caps one day and baffles the rest of the week. Hey, I might even do it. LOL

I have seriously been thinking of making a suppressor, I have the paper work, the $200 isn't really an issue but does kind of bug me, but then there is also probably the long wait of up to 6 mths. I think I am going to just wait and see how this shakes out. My BIL has a sporting goods store and stocks them. Says he would sell way more if it wasn't for the NFA hassle and he even has a setup that kicks out the paper work for a buyer.

I heard about the above possibilities on the radio a couple a weeks ago. They had a couple guys on who made them and the starting price was between $1,000-on up to $2,000. The prices that high were basically "because they can sell them at that price" and that attitude singes my butt. Anyway, it was agreed all around-that prices would drastically drop.
 
Would there be restrictions on importing silencers from overseas? I would sure like to own a Vaime silencer from Finland.

A guy was going to England to do some sport shooting and said they could be used there, but they cant be taken out of the country.
 
I have never owned one. We have a lot of them shot here. Guys have single shots made for them. Of course there are plenty of semi's and full autos too. They had a 9mm one the other day and screwed it on a full auto M16 with a .22 conversion. THAT was sweet. I wonder why more folks don't use 9mm or 45 cans and use them for all calibers. One of my shooters has a Barrett 50 semi with a can. The can weighs over 5 pounds. If they stop the paperwork hassellll I'm in.
 
Even the $200 for the stamp isn't what gets me. Its the $200 and then a 6 months wait for the stamp. My BIL sells suppressors at his store and tells me the wait stops a lot of others also. By the time you have ponied up for the suppressor and the paper work you have a bunch of money sitting in his safe waiting for the stamp to arrive so you can have what you already paid for. Most say no for that reason alone. Guys will pay $1000 for a rifle another $600 or so for a scope, but not if they had to wait 6 months to walk out the door with them.
 
how many have made their own with a mag lite flashlight tube ?? no stamp ..

utube has several videos show how to ..
 
Although it might not be that hard it would still be illegal (federal felony) if you do not apply for and receive a stamp to built a suppressor even if from a flashlight tube and common components. By the way Preppers Discount, the place that produced and sold lots of these flashlight suppressor components as solvent traps was shut down by the BATF and is not selling these parts now.

I am sure I could built a good suppressor. I have studied them, even taken a couple apart. Have all the paper work and would get a stamp to built one. Just waiting to see how this bill goes before I do anything.
 
Back
Top