Anti Gun Protestors

Status
Not open for further replies.
We are already being "invaded" by illegals, who also happen to be re-introducing highly infectious diseases that we had previously eradicated to the point where we became complacent, and stopped inoculating against.
Not exactly "germ warfare" maybe, but IMO it amounts to the same thing.
 
I don't think we're in any danger from an invading foreign force. Unless you count the UN. I think we face far greater danger in the form of DHS and FEMA.

I don't mind stating it. I have no doubt I'm already on the list.

Now, excuse me while I adjust my tin-foil hat!
 
bk42261 said:
We are already being "invaded" by illegals, who also happen to be re-introducing highly infectious diseases that we had previously eradicated to the point where we became complacent, and stopped inoculating against.
Not exactly "germ warfare" maybe, but IMO it amounts to the same thing.
Click to expand...

Well I really hate to challenge a fellow forum member but in this case I have to. Being fully retired and nearly intelligent I have the time and inclination to research things of interest. The consequences of the illegal immigration problem dominterest me. Imhave learned that since Trump took office illegal border crossings have declined by 40%.
I have learned that between deportations and voluntary repatriation of illegals have left the farmers on the west coast and in the southwest with growing concerns about being able to harvest their summer crops due to a declining labor supply. I have learned that there is a substantial criminal as in gang culture of illegals, but not most illegals. It is the really bad gang members I am speaking of.

Now what I have never seen reference to is anything that would leave me to conclude that illegals are sowing diseases among us. So would you please refer me to your info sources from which you obtained your data? I am interested in seeing it.
 
Last edited:
JSR III said:
Not true, I saw him say it in the movie Pearl Harbor......:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Right. And Davy Crockett killed him a b'ar when he was only three.
rofl.gif
 
Lee in Quartzsite said:
Might be true....after all this 11 year old did the same:

11-year-old Alaska boy shoots bear charging fishing party | Fox News
Click to expand...

Their group were very lucky .. the Shotgun the young man was carrying didn't have a sling is why he was carrying cross body and was loaded with buckshot .. one of the shots the shots tracked down the spinal column disabling the bear till it was shot and killed by other rounds of buckshot ..

Really an amazing story for Alaska where a number of people are killed each year by bears ..

When I was in Alaska I carried a pistol in a chest holster when fishing there .. was right next to my hands .. we had a old male brown walk up on us and we just went up higher on the bank and let him pass .. were 3 of us and pistols were in our one hand and bear spray in the other .. He walked on past .. a woman in a remote cabin was killed the year I was there when she went to get water from a stream and walked up on a sow and cubs .. it only takes a few seconds of lack of attention an it can be fatal ..
 
Watchdog said:
Right. And Davy Crockett killed him a b'ar when he was only three.
rofl.gif
Click to expand...

Killing a bar is not so hard. On a Med cruise the squad leaders in my platoon (I was a squad leader then) visited a bar in Athens. It was about 3 AM when they sent us out so they could close up. I figure we killed that bar.

Oh yeah, must mention that I threw up for two days and having gotten soused on ouzo, I could not get near the smell of licorice for years because it made nauseous. A hard price to pay for killing a bar.
 
olcop said:
Yamamoto said words to that effect when he was told of the planned attack on Pearl Harbor---"We can not invade the United States, there will be a rifle behind every blade of grass"
Click to expand...

There isn't a single shred of proof that Yamamoto said any such thing. In fact, given that Japan never demonstrated any intent to invade the mainland United States it's highly unlikely that he would have had any reason to.

He did say

In the first six to twelve months of a war with the United States and Great Britain I will run wild and win victory upon victory. But then, if the war continues after that, I have no expectation of success.
 
Last edited:
Smoke said:
There isn't a single shred of proof that Yamamoto said any such thing. In fact, given that Japan never demonstrated any intent to invade the mainland United States it's highly unlikely that he would have had any reason to.
Click to expand...

Just trying to help:

"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass."
It has been declared this attribution is "unsubstantiated and almost certainly bogus, even though it has been repeated thousands of times in various Internet postings. There is no record of the commander in chief of Japan's wartime fleet ever saying it.", according to Brooks Jackson in "Misquoting Yamamoto" at Factcheck.org (11 May 2009), which cites Donald M. Goldstein, sometimes called "the dean of Pearl Harbor historians", writing "I have never seen it in writing. It has been attributed to the Prange files [the files of the late Gordon W. Prange, chief historian on the staff of Gen. Douglas MacArthur]".
 
When I was watching the Trade Towers collapse and smoke billowing from the Pentagon, fighter jets in the air and civilian air traffic grounded across the nation... the idea of America being under attack didn't seem so far fetched at the moment.

I doubt that America will ever see a ground invasion in our current circumstance, but one thing I have learned in life is that things can change quick, real quick. What is taken for granted will always be can change in a heartbeat.
 
Last edited:
Abraham Lincoln wrote this about foreign invaders 160 years ago:

How then shall we [protect the USA]?--At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it?-- Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step the Ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never!--All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest; with a Buonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years.
Click to expand...

No enemy is strong enough to occupy the USA against the will of its people. Heck, the Soviets couldn't occupy Afghanistan against the will of its people, how could they occupy our far larger and better armed country? No, as Lincoln wrote then is as true today: if democracy is to fall it will fall from forces from within. Lincoln faced those forces in 1861 and defeated them, and radically changed the constitution in the process for the better.
 
They only way they MIGHT flip is when they really feel afraid, and there's nothing or nobody to protect them.
Click to expand...
If this happened They would most likely rationalize it as a short term need only, and then to be used as minimally as possible, with as little injury to the attackers as possible and then a heavy dose of the 'Stockholm Syndrome' to finish up with.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

T
  • Locked
Our Founding Fathers' perspective on private gun ownership.
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
s&wchad
s&wchad
ddeanjohnson
For Sale WTS: 16 guns -- all offers respectfully considered -- collection liquidation
2
Replies
35
Views
21K
Heinz
Heinz
RM Vivas
NYPD - M&P #S812894 - How I Research The NYPD Guns
2
Replies
22
Views
2K
dobegrant
dobegrant
PALADIN85020
The death of Admiral Yamamoto - April 18, 1943
2
Replies
23
Views
964
LVSteve
LVSteve
C
  • Locked
Military collectables, knife, misc
Replies
9
Views
3K
chuck303
C

Latest posts

Back
Top