Why so much hate towards the magnas???

Etalksalot

Member
Joined
May 16, 2017
Messages
756
Reaction score
594
I have really gotten into revolvers a lot in the last year or so, and I have done a ton of research on them. I'm a bit troubled because everywhere I look I see people hating on the magna grips. I guess I just wonder why?? Yeah I understand the felt recoil is more with magnas, but the grips are so classic looking that I feel they are as classic as the guns themselves. All of my revolvers that can fit magna grips have them, including my Taurus 605 which for those who do not know that is a J frame sized 5 shot 357. I shoot heavy rounds put of it as well (Buffalo Bore 180 gr flat nose lead slugs) which seem to be some of the most powerful factory rounds on the market. It kicks hard, but I always liked that about guns. If I wanted a gun that didn't kick hard, I'd shoot a .22. I always made the assumption that since Smith and Colt put magna grips on their guns that that was how they were meant to be.

I've come to notice a couple things, all the old guns (for the most part) had magnas, Detective Specials, Pocket Positives, Lawmans, and various other Colt guns, Smith Models 10, 12, 13, 15, 19, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 60, 64, 66 and this list goes on and on. Even the old single action 6 shooters I figured they made it this way because it was meant to be **** with them. Granted that's just my best guess, but even a lot of 4 inch guns had them. Personally, I just like the look the best, but that's just my personal preference. Now I have seen a lot of people that not only don't like the recoil, but also they don't like the gap behind the trigger guard. A lot of people want grips that will eliminate that gap, but it's my belief that that's how revolvers are supposed to be. I have come to the conclusion that in a world full of semi auto fans, I have concluded that people want to hold a revolver like they do a semi auto, but revolvers weren't made to be held that way. Your finger shouldn't go straight forward from the grip handle, it's supposed to angle downward and the web of your thumb is supposed to press up against the tip of the backstrap. Even the new revolvers have that gap, they just fill it in with the oversized grips. Is it the semi auto craze that makes people want to hold the gun this way?

Now, I understand people who have bad hands, arthritis and such wanting grips that don't hurt, but why is it that so many people feel this way? I mean you're hold a controlled explosive in your hands, and I don't know why people aren't quicker to just accept that. People will have a 357 or a 44 and talk about how it hurts their hands, I mean it is a 357 or a 44, what else would one expect?? I was shooting 357's and 44's when I was 10 years old and would get mad at my dad for putting rubber grips on because I liked the wooden ones better. Is it just the popular thing to do, or do they just not build men as tough as they used to back in the 30's, 40's and 50's? Please no one get offended, it isn't my intention to offend anyone that is why I haven't made fun of anyone or been crappy, I'm just curious to know. It seems like this all started in the 70's from all I can gather. Now interestingly enough, I noticed the newer Model 60's have an interesting feature. The "men's" version has oversized rubber grips, while the "LADY SMITH" has magna grips!!! I'll provide pictures too, and I mean the 357 versions!! I just noticed this today and it tripped me out. That was what made me finally give in and risk persecution from many angry forum members and write this thread. I know I can't be the only person who loves magna grips. The T grips look cool and classic, but I've seen guns for sale, such as Model 19's and even Model 10's with grips from the S&W 500!! What the heck would you need THOSE grips for?!?!? That seems a bit overdone to me. There's a video on YouTube, I won't mention the guys name, but he does a video on the model 19, and he put the magnas back on for the video because he thought people would appreciate it, which I did, until I watched the video. The complaint count had to register in about at least 7 or 8 times. Didn't count, but it's a bit much.

So in short, I just wonder why so many people hate them? They look awesome, and any Smiths or Colts, 4 inch and under I would only have magnas. I'd rather it hurt a little bit than put on rubber grips or even target grips. However, when I go to the range I want powerful rounds. I want it to kick because it's more exciting to me. It someone asked me if I wanna light off a firecracker or a stick of dynamite, you can rest assured it would be dynamite because instead of going boom it goes BOOOOM!! Does anyone else agree with me on this or am I in a drastic minority like I think I am??
 

Attachments

  • SmartSelectImage_2018-01-07-10-27-19.jpg
    SmartSelectImage_2018-01-07-10-27-19.jpg
    22.6 KB · Views: 248
  • SmartSelectImage_2018-01-07-10-27-49.jpg
    SmartSelectImage_2018-01-07-10-27-49.jpg
    24.2 KB · Views: 225
Register to hide this ad
Well, I pretty much agree with you... I like magnas, and the PC variation of the magnas...

Here's an "N" Frame with PC Magnas and a Tyler T Grip...perfect fit for my hand:

les-b-albums-some-of-my-n-frame-s-and-ws-picture17507-1960-model-28-model-58-stocks.jpeg


Best Regards, Les
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure why you're troubled. People like or dislike different grips. I don't like skinny flat wood grips. They're kinda square and kinda small and don't fit into my hand at all. Like trying to shoot a gun while holding onto a pencil. Give me a good thick rubber grip that fills my hands and the guns moves around less


This I don't particularly care for. Shoot, readjust shoot readjust....etc
0212a07c73d617296f40b464cd79d731.jpg



This on the other hand I can shoot 357 all day without so much as moving a finger. Only problem is it's only 6 before reloads
156d10b45b7d8b01d2d325b04da60241.jpg
 
Last edited:
The original grips on my early 1942 Victory were just a little too small for my hands to shoot comfortably and accurately in double action.

While lack of “palm swell” was part of the problem it was more the front to back lack of depth that I had problems with. I sanded down a set of oversized grips from a Taurus M66 and the gun is far more accurate for me.

I guess that’s why the Tyler grip adapter is still so popular.
 

Attachments

  • 17B75794-F8FB-4F4E-AC19-E78B17C366CC.jpg
    17B75794-F8FB-4F4E-AC19-E78B17C366CC.jpg
    159.8 KB · Views: 135
  • F94A6579-083C-401C-B343-73FBE9B62C48.jpg
    F94A6579-083C-401C-B343-73FBE9B62C48.jpg
    152.2 KB · Views: 123
Last edited:
If you like small grips, I'm happy for you. I have a large palm and long fingers, I do not care to hold the neck of a beer bottle and tell me that is a proper grip on my hand gun.

I have a storage tub full of identified small wood grips that were replaced with larger, finger groove Hogue rubber grips. I can control the revolver and the recoil is not as uncomfortable.
 
Well, I like the look of the Magnas and its true that the gun runs fine with them on there , but the stock is so small the it slides through my grip on recoil, so I need to readjust after every shot. I don't mind the recoil, just the readjustment.
If I put a target grip on there, problem solved.
Haven't tried the T-grip.
I'd give that a try.
 
I'm not familiar with the particular vernacular; "hating on".
Is it just part of a sentence that is normally written as: "why you be hating on" ? :D

Let us consult expert Barbara Billingsley (from the movie "Airplane!")

"He said he is in great pain and he wants to know if you can help him"...

"Jus hang loose blood, she gonna catch you up on the rebound in the med-i-cide."
 
Last edited:
Ive tried liking the magnas, but the guns arent as comfortable to shoot and I dont shoot them as well with magnas as with targets.

Hard to say "a gun was meant to have magnas" or any such thing, like theres something bad or wrong with not having what older style grips were available. It has nothing to do with auto loaders, more to do with shooting better. The Tyler T grip adapters and similar were an earlier method of dealing with the trigger guard banging into the knuckles and making small grips easier to hold and shoot well, but the targets are so much nicer to me that I just use them and love them for the most part. They often get worked down to better feeling size and shapes then they came out the door of the factory, but the size is certainly better for my use. If one likes smaller grips, great. Theres a lot of correct answers to the grip question though. :)

The target grips were being used regularly by the middle 50s in many models. I think the model 19 always had targets as standard on the 4" and 6" guns. Most of the model 28s from the 50s Ive had also had targets. If the OP doesnt find target grips comfortable, perhaps trying different variations would be helpful. Newer factory target grips often feel very square, blocky and uncomfortable. Nothing a little file and sandpaper work cant help.
 
Last edited:
My theory is, have on YOUR gun stocks that feel/look good to YOU! That is all that matters! I doubt that many others will be shooting your gun. Bob
 
If it's all about feel and accuracy, then I certainly go with the target grips. I think they are called "target" for a reason.

I have medium to small hands and the revolver with magnas doesn't balance well with the 3 finger grip. I think it's about trying to get the second finger to hold the weight.

I shoot a lot of silhouette and have found target grips with the thumb ledge gives me much better overall control of the sixgun. It lets my trigger finger float much more freely.

I also have found that the magnas make it easier to pull down and to the left. That is the classic rookie group from jerking the trigger.

I've stopped buying hawglegs with magnas because I really dislike trying to get a perfect "fit to the frame" on new target grips. The magnas now just look too small for a medium or large frame (the beauty contest).

The factory targets are what I seek on all purchases.

Prescut
 
Back
Top