Update 6/19/18 NRA backed NJ CCW case Notice of Appeal filed

Joined
Feb 1, 2011
Messages
6,859
Reaction score
17,178
Location
PRNJ
Notice of Appeal to Third Circuit was filed 6/18/18

Case No. Assigned as Third Circuit USCA Case Number 18-2366

It will take Six months to a year for the Third Circuit to affirm the District Court, making the case ready for appeal to the Supreme Court

Supreme Court will then decide whether it wants to hear the case


Update 5/21/18
As expected by all, the District Court followed the binding Third Circuit decision in Drake and found as a matter of course that NJ's justifiable need requirement for a permit to carry was constitutional. District Court Opinion here Do not blame the District Court Judge as he upheld his sworn duty by following the rule of law. The case is now ready for appeal to the Third Circuit -- which will most likely follow its own prior opinion -- making the case ripe for appeal to the Supreme Court. IMHO, this is the "May Issue" permit to carry case that the Supreme Court may actually agree to hear.

Lawsuit filed February 5, 2018

Does not really matter what happens at the District Court or the Third Circuit Court of Appeals because the issue will need to be decided by the United States Supreme Court if they decide to hear it. In fact, the District Court should grant summary judgment against the plaintiff under a prior Third Circuit decision.

This following is an accurate admission in the Complaint, which was required under the obligation to tell the Court about binding precedent that is directly against a party's position.

Plaintiffs acknowledge that the result they seek is contrary to Drake v. Filko, 724
F.3d 426 (3d Cir. 2014), but, for the reasons explained in Wrenn v. District of Columbia, 864 F.3d
650 (D.C. Cir. 2017), that case was wrongly decided. They therefore institute this litigation to
vindicate their Second Amendment rights and to seek to have Drake overruled.

Basically, the pro-2A Plaintiffs filed the case in a good faith effort to get the Supreme Court to reverse lower courts' interpretation of the Second Amendment as it applies to the right to carry.

Link to the Complaint

Check the Docket Sheet Here

Assigned to the Hon. Brian R. Martinotti

Note: The Complaint was not filed by Alan Gura, the architect of the Heller case.
However, it does have the backing of the NRA

Update 4/3/18
Motion to dismiss filed by New Jersey

Some of the Docket Here: Rogers & ANJRPC v. Grewal, et al. - Keith Kaplan's Blog

Complaint

Motion to Dismiss

Response to the Motion to Dismiss is due 4/23/18

Update on response to Motion to Dismiss, 4/23/18
As they must, Plaintiffs have conceded that under controlling Third Circuit authority, the District Court must uphold New Jersey's defacto CCW ban and pass the case on up to a higher court that can overturn the controlling authority:

In sum, New Jersey's "justifiable need" restriction is unconstitutional, but
Plaintiffs concede that this Court is presently bound by circuit precedent to uphold
it.

IMHO The district court should immediately issue a one page Final Judgment dismissing the complaint under Drake v. Filko, 724
F.3d 426 (3d Cir. 2014), and thereby allow the_case to go up on appeal.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
It will be interesting to follow this case and see how it gets decided.

I believe that both the District Court and the Third Circuit Court of appeals will be required to follow precedent and dismiss this case out of hand.

Up until now the U.S. Supreme court has declined to hear a concealed carry case. In my opinion, they were hoping to first get a CCW case from the District of Columbia so that they would not have to decide whether a protection of CCW applied to the States.

However, after the D.C. Court of Appeals upheld CCW in D.C., D.C. chose not to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Now the only hope is that the Supreme Court will take a case from a state that is infringing on CCW
 
Good luck. While I believe that the case is clear cut in favor of the plaintiff, I doubt he will get a decision in his favor. To many judges the Constitution is just a piece of paper they have to carefully step around. Getting it in front of the US Supreme court is pretty much at the justices whim and they believe corporations have the same freedoms as a individual citizen anything can happen.
 
What a coincidence. I'll be having a colonoscopy on March 13. In a manner of speaking, I'm betting that the gun owners in New Jersey will be joining me.
 
What a coincidence. I'll be having a colonoscopy on March 13. In a manner of speaking, I'm betting that the gun owners in New Jersey will be joining me.

At least you were given the option of anesthesia for YOUR reaming.

A couple of years back I read where an applicant for CCW was told they should change jobs away from the current one that took them into areas where the carrying of large sums was required, to a job with less risk.

I'm sorry, but I didn't save the article.
 
Update on response to Motion to Dismiss, 4/23/18
As they must, Plaintiffs have conceded that under controlling Third Circuit authority, the District Court must uphold New Jersey's defacto CCW ban and pass the case on up to a higher court that can overturn the controlling authority:

In sum, New Jersey's "justifiable need" restriction is unconstitutional, but
Plaintiffs concede that this Court is presently bound by circuit precedent to uphold
it.

IMHO The district court should immediately issue a one page Final Judgment dismissing the complaint under Drake v. Filko, 724
F.3d 426 (3d Cir. 2014), and thereby allow the _case to go up on appeal.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top