1013 Mag Followers
It's done, and finally got to the range today for the first shots with my 10mm converted CS40 today...
I used followers from the S&W 1076, but had to cut the sides down a bit to clear the 'humps' near the top of the CS40 mags.
.
Question on gutting the magazine:
Is the follower the only thing you cut down on the sides? The hump at the bottom rear of my magazine keeps the 10mm follower from fitting. Does this get ground off? I do not see any weld spots on the inside of the magazine.
Any info is appreciated!
.
For those converting the 4013, 4053, I remember having issues with the crimps on the sides of the magazines that secure the spacer interfering with the follower. Had to take a pillar file and remove some material off of the protrusion from the inside of the mag body in order for the follower to work smoothly.
.
Since this thread has ended up with related info on converting both CS40s & 4013/4014/4053s I'll add this item from my recent 4013 conversion:
On my initial test firing, after reaming the spare 4013 barrel I got from Numrich & modifying the 4013 mag, I had two times where the slide did not lock back after the last round was fired.
Apparently I missed some of the previous notes on using the 1006 followers in the modified 4013 (1013) mags. Some semi-related work on a second 4013 I just bought had me noticing the differences/revisions in 4013 followers & it dawned on my to look closer at the position of the 1006 follower in the 1013 mag.
First off, two things, the mouth/opening of the 1006 mags are are slightly wider than the mouth of the 4013 mags. The depth & width of the lower bodies are the same. Secondly, the notch/opening on the left side of the followers (where the follower pushs up on the slide stop's arm) are slightly different too, the 1006's opening being longer vertically (distances "A" & "B" noted in my attached pic).
So the 1006 followers go freely to the top of their mags but the 1006 followers are too wide to go freely to the top of the 1013 mag (see attached pics).
S&W apparently saw a similar issue (?) on the 4013 mags & revised them to have a slight chamfer to the top left & right sides (notation "C" in my pic), because of the rebated lips on the mags, to allow them to freely feed to the top.
(Note: the 4013 mags evolved, as typical of others, & there are several versions. I used the ones without the additional vertical indention to hold the top round.)
The 1006 followers are ~.440" wide across their top while the 4013 "chamfered" followers are ~.390". By carefully chamfering the corresponding points on the 1006 followers (notation "D" in my pic) to ~.400" wide the (1013) follower will freely go to the top of the 1013 mag.
Without this full range of movement the follower can't forcefully push up the slide stop to consistently lock the slide back on the last round irregardless of spring force.
I chamfered mine by first making a reference line ~.170" down from the top of the follower to give it a similar chamfer (notation "C" & "D"). I used a low speed Dremel mini-sanding drum & a small long nose Vise-grip plier, loosely clamped in place, to provide a guide & restrict where I cut. I later used a small fine cut file to smooth out the surface.
.
On my mag I was able to use a 1/4" chisel to separate the spacer from the back of the 4013 mag & it just popped out as I carefully drove the chisel deeper. The spacer appears to be held in place by indentions, not tack welds, that were easily minimized to not interfere with the follower.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.