Can we sue Mexico for creating the worlds largest COVID super spreader event? Wait, never mind, wrong government.
The Government of Mexico vs. Smith and Wesson Corp.
- Thread starter peter-paul
- Start date
If I had to do an organizational chat for the cartels it would be this:
Cartel Leaders Would fall somewhere between the President and Mexico's Congress.
Of course all money/funding goes from the Cartels to the people in the org chart
- President of Mexico
- Presidential Cabinet members and defense secretary
- Mexico's Congress Senators and Representatives
- Federal Police
- Governors
- State Legislators
- State Police
- Local Police
Cartel Leaders Would fall somewhere between the President and Mexico's Congress.
Of course all money/funding goes from the Cartels to the people in the org chart
I would add Biden to the list of possible backers, via tying it to Mexico getting aid.
Would it surprise any of us if the current administration said to Mexico "if you take on some of our larger gun manufacturers we'll give you X dollars in aid for X program ...", the administration's goal of course, to weaken the gun manufacturers. Only a possibility, but nothing would surprise me. Viewed another way, Mexico would not be suing American gun manufacturers if the last administration was still there.
Last edited:
So, once again, suing manufacturers for producing products that work as intended, yet are misused by miscreants. When can we sue motor vehicle manufacturers for damages caused by drunk or reckless drivers? I bashed my thumb with a hammer while trying to drive a nail, can I sue the hammer manufacturer?
As always, I expect there is far more to the motivations behind this legal action.
As always, I expect there is far more to the motivations behind this legal action.
gwpercle
Member
Since when has Mexico started sueing American companies ...and American GUN companies ... I smell a RAT ...
Just who is behind this move , just who is footing Mexico's legal costs .
Might Mexico's be opening a Pandora's Box ... we should sue them for our increase in crime from their lack of action combating the drug cartels .
If they would have just left the wall up ... But Oh No we cant do that
Lets defund the police , empower criminals , let them flood in from the South and when killings are at a all time high ...claim as a health measure we are going to disarm the law abiding citizen to make you safe . Their Game Plan is so easy to see ... disarmed men are so easy to control ...
Gary
Just who is behind this move , just who is footing Mexico's legal costs .
Might Mexico's be opening a Pandora's Box ... we should sue them for our increase in crime from their lack of action combating the drug cartels .
If they would have just left the wall up ... But Oh No we cant do that
Lets defund the police , empower criminals , let them flood in from the South and when killings are at a all time high ...claim as a health measure we are going to disarm the law abiding citizen to make you safe . Their Game Plan is so easy to see ... disarmed men are so easy to control ...
Gary
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2012
- Messages
- 4,619
- Reaction score
- 7,838
You'd have to read the filing. The explanation is in there. The SCOTUS has previously ruled on who's laws apply in cross border disputes.
Echo40
Member
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2017
- Messages
- 4,062
- Reaction score
- 7,901
It will be funny to see where this ends up. I'm curious just how many American companies will be willing to export firearms to Mexico or even sell weapons to the Mexican government after the dust settles on this.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, anywhere that allows firearms manufacturers to be held legally responsible for any crimes committed using their weapons should follow the example of Mark Serbu when the NYPD wanted to buy guns that were illegal in NY and refuse to do business with them altogether.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, anywhere that allows firearms manufacturers to be held legally responsible for any crimes committed using their weapons should follow the example of Mark Serbu when the NYPD wanted to buy guns that were illegal in NY and refuse to do business with them altogether.
We and the RoM could solve lots of problems by simply having joint points of entry for north and southbound traffic of all kinds. We don't bother stopping folks leaving the US; they don't much care about what goes north. Treating it like we do in several US commercial vehicle interstate highway combined ports of entry gets everyone invested and with uniform equipment.
But, we ain't nebber dun it that way b4. Rolls eyes.
But, we ain't nebber dun it that way b4. Rolls eyes.
handejector
Staff member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2005
- Messages
- 26,129
- Reaction score
- 47,012
I've come up with a novel thought-
Maybe both countries would benefit from the existence of a real border.
Maybe both countries would benefit from the existence of a real border.
You're singing my tune!
Spent time recently teaching 'Green Border Surveillance' in Bosnia and Herzegovina; they have EU (hard) borders to the north and west, and softer borders with non-EU countries to the east and south. We KNOW how to fix these problems, and teach others to do so, but too many American politicians get power, donations, and prestige from the existing mess on our southern border to want to fix it.
Spent time recently teaching 'Green Border Surveillance' in Bosnia and Herzegovina; they have EU (hard) borders to the north and west, and softer borders with non-EU countries to the east and south. We KNOW how to fix these problems, and teach others to do so, but too many American politicians get power, donations, and prestige from the existing mess on our southern border to want to fix it.
Last edited:
We were doing $1.6 billion/day in trade across the border in 2019 and the business of the US is business..right? There is no easy fix that won't have huge economic repercussions
No EASY fix, but there are all kinds of fixes that will have no real impact on legitimate trade.
MESIS in Amman, Jordan, and Sandia National Labs (among other entities) have training and equipment research exactly applicable to our Southwest border. There are proven 21st century methods and tech to apply to our problem border that will measurably reduce smuggling (all kinds), human trafficking, and terrorist infiltration in both directions without negatively impacting cross-border trade. None make good political slogans.
MESIS in Amman, Jordan, and Sandia National Labs (among other entities) have training and equipment research exactly applicable to our Southwest border. There are proven 21st century methods and tech to apply to our problem border that will measurably reduce smuggling (all kinds), human trafficking, and terrorist infiltration in both directions without negatively impacting cross-border trade. None make good political slogans.
Last edited:
This case was filed in the Federal Court - District of Massachusetts. That is why the distributor in Boston is one of the defendants.
The plaintiffs are judge/jury shopping - don't be surprised how far this one goes.
The plaintiffs are judge/jury shopping - don't be surprised how far this one goes.
Yes, the ones from Taco Bell at least.
Beemer-mark
Member
I have hunch he will support it (if he didn't suggest it).
LDM
Member
Mexico should indict and demand the extradition of Obama and Holder for that "Fast and Furious" fiasco. They're the ones responsible for murders and other gun violence.
hyena
Member
This smells like George Soros to me.
I'm surprised they didn't demand the return of Texas while they were at it.
Perhaps Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, and California will end up being part of the settlement.
