There and Back Again: From Luxury to Budget -- My Primary Carry Gun Experience.

Echo40

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2017
Messages
4,058
Reaction score
7,894
I've always had a sort of thing for fancy or otherwise flashy guns, to the point that for a time, I actually would opt to carry something that wasn't necessarily the best option, merely because I liked the look of it better.

From 2015 to 2019 my primary carry gun was a Walther PPK/S, a classy little carry piece made almost entirely of Stainless Steel with a lovely pair of aftermarket Altamont Rosewood Grips.

attachment.php


However, over that course of time, I began to consider other options, and began to desire something smaller and lighter, which ultimately lead me to the Ruger LCP. Sure, there were fancier options on the market of similar size/weight such as the SIG P238 and the Remington RM380, but I liked the Ruger LCP for its track record for reliability, and to suit my desire for a bit of flair, I opted for the 10th Anniversary Edition with an Engraved Stainless Steel Slide, but for all intents and purposes, it was still a budget pistol.

attachment.php


A few months later that same year, due to a number of reports of wild predatory animals coming out of the woods surrounding my residential area, I decided that I wanted to carry something with a bit more oomph than .380 ACP, just incase I were to have to defend myself against something like a hog, but I didn't have any money to spend on yet another new carry gun after buying the LCP. However, one day when I stopped into my favorite gunshop to buy a couple boxes of ammo, I saw a Smith & Wesson SW40VE in the case, Like New for just $199, so I put it on layaway and paid it off the next month.
For those who aren't familiar with it, the SW40VE is a 3rd Generation variant of Smith & Wesson's Sigma Series of pistols which had in recent years become their budget line of pistols compared to the higher end Smith & Walther SW99 collaboration and later the M&P Series.

attachment.php


Well, early this year I decided to get something a bit nicer, but since I was concerned over the possibility of future Gun Control legislation and because I wanted something smaller and lighter than the SW40VE, (which is a Compact Pistol similar in size to the Glock 23) I ultimately ended up with a Smith & Wesson Performance Center M&P40 Shield 1.0 which I had found a really good deal for online.

attachment.php


I love the Shield, and I've carried it all year long with confidence, but today since the weather was too cold for shorts and I could easily carry a bigger gun, I decided to carry my trusty SW40VE again, and that's most likely what I'm goung to do clear into next Summer when it gets warm enough for shorts again. Because while the SW40VE isn't as fancy a gun as my Performance Center M&P40 Shield, and although the trigger isn't as nice, it holds more ammo, is easy to carry in colder weather, feels great in my hand, and is plenty accurate/reliable, so I see no reason to carry the lower capacity Shield. Both are carried concealed anyway, so it's not like I gain anything by carrying the fancier Shield, and besides, they're both just utilitarian polymer framed guns to begin with, so I wouldn't be wearing either to a Barbecue regardless.

I'm curious if anyone else here has been in the same position, and went back to carrying what is generally regarded as a lower quality firearm after a time carrying something of higher quality. What's your story?
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
IF you were ever to use your gun in a self defense situation, it will be seized as evidence and it will likely be years before you ever - if ever get it returned. So, keep that in mind when you consider carrying the Wilson, Les Baer, Smith PC model, etc. As a side note, it will not receive the care it gets at home while residing in the police property room…
 
IF you were ever to use your gun in a self defense situation, it will be seized as evidence and it will likely be years before you ever - if ever get it returned. So, keep that in mind when you consider carrying the Wilson, Les Baer, Smith PC model, etc. As a side note, it will not receive the care it gets at home while residing in the police property room…


Seriously why is that even a concern. If I have to use it, it did it's job. I'll buy another one if I have to. I wear nice clothes sometimes too even though ems will just cut them off if I get injured.

I carry what I like and shoot well. That includes a shield which while it didn't break the bank isn't a Saturday night special and is kind of a step up from a ppk in the shooting department of you ask me.
 
Do you want to accessorize or carry the most comfortable gun that will serve its purpose. I have a lot of choices, I carry a Gen 1 LCP. 600 rounds without one hic up. Small, cheap and effective.

It's fun to carry my "nicer" guns, but far from necessary.
 
Seriously why is that even a concern. If I have to use it, it did it's job. I'll buy another one if I have to. I wear nice clothes sometimes too even though ems will just cut them off if I get injured.

I carry what I like and shoot well. That includes a shield which while it didn't break the bank isn't a Saturday night special and is kind of a step up from a ppk in the shooting department of you ask me.

It's a concern to many because they have to have something to worry about and obsess over.
 
Seriously why is that even a concern. If I have to use it, it did it's job. I'll buy another one if I have to. I wear nice clothes sometimes too even though ems will just cut them off if I get injured.
Makes sense too me. I also don't drive a piece of junk so if I have a wreck my good car won't get damaged.
My pride is another reason for carrying a good gun. When I die or get killed I don't want too be found dead with a cheap gun. Larry
 
If a gun looked like my ex sister n law I'd carry it, if it did the job it was supposed to do. To me, looks mean nothing, it can either do the job or not. if the answer is not, then I divest myself of it.
 
Looks are not everything. I mostly carry a M-649, which I once thought was plug ugly but it grew on me. I also carry a Walther CCP, better looking than a Glock but just as plastic :eek: , but these compact guns work for me so they lead the carry list. I don't worry about how they look because nobody sees them!

iscs-yoda-albums-s-and-w-revolvers-picture18704-model-649-a.jpg



iscs-yoda-albums-pistols-all-brands-picture23941-walther-ccp-9mm.jpg
 
In the Garden of Good and Evil.

IF you were ever to use your gun in a self defense situation, it will be seized as evidence and it will likely be years before you ever - if ever get it returned. So, keep that in mind when you consider carrying the Wilson, Les Baer, Smith PC model, etc. As a side note, it will not receive the care it gets at home while residing in the police property room…

Wow! Are you kidding? My life is worth more than some stupid
gun.

I have thought about what you said before, but if
that happens I'll just seek out and buy the hard to find
Revolver I had before. I'm conservative but not that
conservative.

It may cost me more but I'll worry about that when it happens.
 

Attachments

  • B3BC3523-E89A-4698-AAE7-B3A1DCE7EB20.jpg
    B3BC3523-E89A-4698-AAE7-B3A1DCE7EB20.jpg
    74.8 KB · Views: 111
Gun shop tried to sell me the Wilson 9mm EDC9. Awesomely crafted gun it is. $3000 is the price of admission.

For that kind of money I can get five G19s. And my G19 carries 16 rounds. Wilson only carried nine. So I run out of ammo quick, and the thugz get my $3000 gun as an extra prize. Whereas if I'd packed the Glock, I'd have stayed alive.
 
Last edited:
I get what folks are saying about a gun lost in exchange for dear life is a more than equal trade, but at the same time, why carry a fancy/expensive firearm for self-defense is a plain/inexpensive pistol will work just as well and won't cost you anything that you'll miss? Your life can still be saved by a Glock while your more expensive guns remain safe inside of your safe back at home, its a win/win.
 
Looks are not everything. I mostly carry a M-649, which I once thought was plug ugly but it grew on me. I also carry a Walther CCP, better looking than a Glock but just as plastic :eek: , but these compact guns work for me so they lead the carry list. I don't worry about how they look because nobody sees them!

iscs-yoda-albums-s-and-w-revolvers-picture18704-model-649-a.jpg



iscs-yoda-albums-pistols-all-brands-picture23941-walther-ccp-9mm.jpg


Ditto about the pug ugly! But, they've grown on me too and I would carry one if I had one!
 
I am first and foremost about utility and function. Current concealed carry is an LCP Max. Not a custom gun by any means, pretty utilitarian, and high capacity.
 
The gun that has saved your life doesn't owe you any money, and replacement costs shouldn't even enter the mental calculus.
 
Last edited:
I think that the mentality behind concern over replacement depends greatly on income. Obviously those with more money who can more easily afford replacements are going to be less concerned than someone who can't so readily replace a handgun in the aftermath of a self-defense shooting.

Personally, it's at least a minor concern for me, hence why I would sooner carry a more utilitarian firearm than something fancy or otherwise expensive.
 
I get what folks are saying about a gun lost in exchange for dear life is a more than equal trade, but at the same time, why carry a fancy/expensive firearm for self-defense is a plain/inexpensive pistol will work just as well and won't cost you anything that you'll miss? Your life can still be saved by a Glock while your more expensive guns remain safe inside of your safe back at home, its a win/win.

You're setting up the cheap car analogy again. Why drive a nice vehicle if something beat up will get you the same result?
Answer: Because I want to.
 
Back
Top