Probably as many as the fired gun cases manufacturers were forced to send to NY and MD state police ,for sales in those states, that were used to solve gun crimes.
Govt is going after the low hanging fruit-this time ghost guns
- Thread starter bushmaster1313
- Start date
Probably as many as the fired gun cases manufacturers were forced to send to NY and MD state police ,for sales in those states, that were used to solve gun crimes.
That just changed with the new executive order. Now ALL 4473s must be turned in to the Feds.
sipowicz
Member
RWPBR
Member
You are extrapolating. This is a gun control thread. Dictators like gun control. Using a humorous meme is not uncivil.
V/R
The Chief
Here's a couple links for old school stuff. It is for those who
might need things.
First one came out in 1969. Pages 96-143 are good for small
stuff like this thread seems to dance around.
https://www.militarynewbie.com/wp-c...ions-Handbook-1969-Department-of-the-Army.pdf
Second book from 66 is very illuminating for things that
need illumination as it were.
https://www.militarynewbie.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/TM-31-201-1.pdf
You might want to print them out because paper doesn't need
batteries. Hopefully their information won't be needed but I
hear the ratchet clicking as the screws get tighter.
might need things.
First one came out in 1969. Pages 96-143 are good for small
stuff like this thread seems to dance around.
https://www.militarynewbie.com/wp-c...ions-Handbook-1969-Department-of-the-Army.pdf
Second book from 66 is very illuminating for things that
need illumination as it were.
https://www.militarynewbie.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/TM-31-201-1.pdf
You might want to print them out because paper doesn't need
batteries. Hopefully their information won't be needed but I
hear the ratchet clicking as the screws get tighter.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2019
- Messages
- 75
- Reaction score
- 394
And all for gun registration, have yet to personally meet a LEO who was not in favor of gun registration.
Hi, I'm George from Philadelphia.....Now you met one.
Hi, I'm George from Philadelphia.....Now you met one.
None of this is good and the republicans will do nothing to stop it, but it doesn't look (from what I've read) like it stops a person from building an 80% receiver into a firearm. The insidious part is the feds now want all those 4473s to wallow around in. I'm sure there's more insidiousness to come but thats what I've read.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2021
- Messages
- 5,249
- Reaction score
- 9,127
That was written on the Russian missile that hit the train station in Ukraine killing women and kids.
GOA is already on this. You can go to their website for more info.
That is rude and uncalled for. As a vet and former marine law enforcement at a federal port, I have served this country, earning my views. How have you served this country that gives you the right to badmouth someone who has?
To think that regulating ghost guns will somehow 'rob' states of their freedoms is thinking from the shallow end of the pool. Next thing you know, 'they' will be demanding you license your trucks and dogs, and than the fight is really on.
Last edited:
I would like to get a couple of 20% lowers to see how that milling machine I got works next winter. What seems to be overlooked is that it is not legal to make yourself a gun then sell it to someone else, that makes you a firearm manufacturer and uncle sugar will want his cut. That's the way I understand it, but I may be wrong. This is the same reason some friends when the asked if I would sell them some of my reloads the answer was no.
OP
This is the new rule on Ghost guns and definition of frame and Receiver
The new rule is here
https://www.atf.gov/firearms/docs/rulemaking/final-rule-2021r-05f-definition-frame-or-receiver-and-identification/download
Does a lot more than regulate so-called "Ghost Guns"
A very important part of the rule is how it defines "frame or receiver"
In an AR-15 type gun the "receiver" is what some call a "stripped lower"
In a 1911, the frame is what we normally think of as the frame (i.e., the part that holds the trigger).
I think the above is correct but your mileage might vary
From what I have read, a new definition of frame or receiver was needed because under the old rules neither the upper nor the lower of an AR-15, or the fully assembled gun, met the definition of "firearm."
From the summary:
^^^ Note the red highlighting above. This is now evidence in a court of law that an AR-15 type rifle is not unusual. Very significant.
This is from the summary:
Finally, if anyone wants to protest these new regulations I think it would be a HUGE mistake to try and cut it close to the line without stepping over. IMHO, the best way to protest these regulations is to purchase an American made semi-automatic rifle that conforms to the laws in your jurisdiction. Thereby adding to the argument - one rifle at at time - that these guns are popular and not unusual.
The new rule is here
https://www.atf.gov/firearms/docs/rulemaking/final-rule-2021r-05f-definition-frame-or-receiver-and-identification/download
Does a lot more than regulate so-called "Ghost Guns"
A very important part of the rule is how it defines "frame or receiver"
In an AR-15 type gun the "receiver" is what some call a "stripped lower"
In a 1911, the frame is what we normally think of as the frame (i.e., the part that holds the trigger).
I think the above is correct but your mileage might vary
From what I have read, a new definition of frame or receiver was needed because under the old rules neither the upper nor the lower of an AR-15, or the fully assembled gun, met the definition of "firearm."
From the summary:
^^^ Note the red highlighting above. This is now evidence in a court of law that an AR-15 type rifle is not unusual. Very significant.
This is from the summary:
Finally, if anyone wants to protest these new regulations I think it would be a HUGE mistake to try and cut it close to the line without stepping over. IMHO, the best way to protest these regulations is to purchase an American made semi-automatic rifle that conforms to the laws in your jurisdiction. Thereby adding to the argument - one rifle at at time - that these guns are popular and not unusual.
Last edited:
In fact, I believe a person can sell a firearm they made from an 80% lower as long as they didn't make it with the INTENT to sell it. That is my understanding. I've seen a few for sale in the local gun classifieds and nobody seems to have a cow about it.
That said, I certainly wouldn't try it. Proving "intent" could be minefield.
bulletslap
Member
On a tangent, isn't it ironic that Hunter Biden was not prosecuted for lying on a 4473?
Last edited by a moderator:
I can see the future!
It's a.......lock!
It's a.......lock!
I don't believe you.
luvsmiths
Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2016
- Messages
- 1,135
- Reaction score
- 2,185
Again, when everyone thinks like you, NO State will be free.
And just a small FYI- if you don't know what gave me my right to say what I said, go back to school. I stand by what I said, and your "service" doesn't exclude you, sorry if you thought it did.
And guess what? Being born an American, and under the Constitution of this Country.... that gave me right to MY views. Don't like them, don't read them. I would have guessed you knew about the Constitution of the United States though, being how you served and all.
When all people think that "cutting and running" as you suggest as being the way to go, instead of fighting,
NO STATE WILL BE SAFE.
Do you need it explained in some other type of way, that you can better understand? If so, let me know what you want to hear, and I'll write that for you..
Or not. Probably not.
Oh- and did you know that the bill of rights didn't guarantee anything about trucks and dogs? Go check it out. It's true.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
