BEST OF BOTH WORLDS

crazyphil

US Veteran / Absent Comrade
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
8,002
Reaction score
29,706
Location
Boise, Idaho
I have always preferred open top holsters, especially for concealed
carry. When I want to get my gun out in a hurry, I don't want to
be messing with a thumb snap.

Well, a while back I became obsessed with the "pull-thru" snap.
We can have a snap over the gun for retention, but it can be
pulled as if there is no strap or snap. I consider that the best
of both worlds.

I believe that Chic Gaylord probably made the first pull thru snap
with his Treasury Thunderbolt. A while back JayCeeNC posted a
Thunderbolt. But after careful study of the "stitch signature" we
concluded that the exact copy was made by Seventrees. The
thread is titled Maker Specific Gaylord - Seventrees, if you want
to Search for it.

What's the downside? I have read that some have found that
the pull-thru snap scratches their gun, but I haven't had that
problem - yet.

Here are some with the pull-thru snap that I have collected:

Ken Null's VAM (for Vampire) driver's holster with my 642-1
Seventrees Scorpion with my Colt's Agent (Chic Gaylord gunbelt)
Alessi's belt holster with my 4" Model 10 (Chic Gaylord gunbelt)
Desantis IWB with Colt's Agent (Chic Gaylord gunbelt)
Chic Gaylord's Thunderbolt (photo from his catalog) I don't
have one, but I want one.
 

Attachments

  • SAM_1928.jpg
    SAM_1928.jpg
    107.4 KB · Views: 250
  • SAM_1933.jpg
    SAM_1933.jpg
    70.2 KB · Views: 253
  • SAM_1891.jpg
    SAM_1891.jpg
    62.5 KB · Views: 246
  • SAM_2006.jpg
    SAM_2006.jpg
    63.7 KB · Views: 232
  • SAM_2104.jpg
    SAM_2104.jpg
    147.8 KB · Views: 218
Register to hide this ad
Why not just carry an Airweight (or two) in your front pants pocket(s)... I would guess it doesn't get any faster than that... In winter, you could put it in your coat pocket.....
And you could still have a beautiful holster collection at the same time :-)
Just a curious question,
J.
 
Well. In defense of the pocket holster, I'll say that if you perceive a potential threat, and have your hand in your pocket and on your gun, anticipating the need to draw and shoot, it is pretty close to having your gun in hand and held down against your leg.

Not much faster than that.

It's fast, the pocket holster, with your hand on it.

Now if you are in a High Noon, Marshall Dillion, who's faster, face off, fair 'n square no touching the guns until the git go, I agree. OWB is faster. But, that is a pretty unusual circumstance, outside Hollywood, in real life.

Or, if, suddenly threatened, when totally unaware of a threat, out of the blue, and you need to draw and shoot ASAP...Well, okay. OWB is faster.

But, really, how likely is that?

And, there is a lot to be said for the sneaky/stealth of a pocket holster in catching your opponent unawares.

I like OWB, and usually do, for comfort. Maybe aesthetics, too. I like a well crafted holster on my belt. But pocket holsters have their place. And, used as described above, plenty fast, too.
 
I carried a S&W 66 4" in an Alessi rig identical to the one holding your Model 10 for many years while in Investigations. When I wasn't using a shoulder rig that is.

It's a VERY comfortable piece of kit.
 
i used to carry a 1911 in an open top holster and never worried about it. i just can't seem to get that confident with my revolvers. maybe i just haven't found the right holster.

my test is simple. insert revolver, hold upside down, give it a shake or 3. if gun falls out holster takes it's place in the not used holster drawer. the drawer is getting to small.

the wife and i were at a restaurant and heard a heavy whack. turned and looked at the fellow hustling his pistol up off the floor near their table. the small semi auto then went in his pocket. I DON'T WANT TO BE THAT GUY. krs/kenny
 
Back
Top