Dodge goes electric

JJEH

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
8,451
Location
Central Texas
Hate to see it, but I'm sure they just want the taxpayer funded incentives, and Dodge is the brand they sacrifice for it in case it doesn't work out.

Stellantis already has hybrids in their stable, that's nothing new, but now they want to go full EV by next year and these cars will be Dodges.

I know, they showed the full-EV Chrysler Airflow Concept a few months back, but the Chrysler boss lady said it's not destined for production. Why, I have no idea...

So if you still want a Hemi Charger or Challenger, 2023 is the year to buy one. If you are lucky to get one and if you are willing to pay the price, dealer markups and all!!!

LAST CALL: DODGE TEASES 2023 DODGE CHARGER AND DODGE CHALLENGER LINEUP, INCLUDING SEVEN NEW MODELS

At least you can now also get a Challenger convertible...

DROPTOP CHALLENGER: DODGE DEALERS OFFER NEW STREAMLINED PROCESS FOR THIRD-PARTY CHALLENGER CONVERTIBLE MODIFICATIONS

The funny thing is that they keep their Hellcat Durango.... guess it's a good thing to have the most powerful factory SUV on the market.

THE CAT IS BACK: 2023 DODGE DURANGO SRT® HELLCAT — MOST POWERFUL SUV EVER — RETURNS TO DODGE LINEUP

Anyway, here's what the future of Dodge looks like. The first ever Dodge hybrid vehicle, the Hornet. Yes, they brought the name back, first Hudson, then AMC and now Dodge.

attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php


THE HIVE HAS ARRIVED: ALL-NEW 2023 DODGE HORNET UNLOCKS GATEWAY TO DODGE MUSCLE, OFFERS QUICKEST, FASTEST, MOST POWERFUL COMPACT UTILITY VEHICLE UNDER $30,000

Honestly, I like the face of it and I wouldn't even care about the hybrid 4banger engine. But for the life of me, I can't stand these cross-over models :barf:

I want a sedan, station wagon, suv or pick-up truck. Not these in-between-don't-know-what-it-is ugly things...

They did the same thing with Maserati...called the Grecale. Instead of another 2door coupe or a full-size suv they added a mid-size cross-over thing.... so dang ugly... and honestly, too small for a family of four or five (almost no space for luggage, just like in a sedan, so no real advantage besides looking like a bloated dolphin!). Really don't know what their target market is... singles or couples with no taste?

I don't know if the brothers would approve. All I know is that America is (still) getting Euronized. Back in the day we had unique styling, powertrains, etc. and many people in other countries were jealous that they didn't have it (incl. me), but now the European styling is coming to us, and I don't like it! If I want European styling, I'll buy a European car. It's that simple. Can't figure out why they can't hire people who love American designs. And, to top it off, the Hornet is made in Italy :rolleyes:

I'll open a go fund me to buy the Dodge rights from Stellantis, because in all reality, all they need to do is slap an Alfa or Fiat logo on there. It has no character and it's so sterile, at this point it could be anything... :mad:

More info:

2023 Dodge Hornet: What We Know So Far
 

Attachments

  • Hornet_Feature.jpg
    Hornet_Feature.jpg
    74.7 KB · Views: 401
  • 2023-dodge-hornet-gt-203-1660685326.jpg
    2023-dodge-hornet-gt-203-1660685326.jpg
    117.1 KB · Views: 347
  • 2023-dodge-hornet-gt-214-1660685329.jpg
    2023-dodge-hornet-gt-214-1660685329.jpg
    85.9 KB · Views: 345
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
That's terrible news, The Charger/Challenger models are cars with timeless appeal. They probably would have sold for many years had they been continued. Now Stellantis, an unwieldy conglomerate company with a meaningless made-up name, is going to replace these classic cars with yet another boring, characterless, and ugly "crossover utility vehicle". Your "Barf" is most appropriate. I fear Stellantis may become the British Leyland of the 21st century.
 
Last edited:
There are a bunch of reasons why CUVs work:

1) Folk like to sit higher, but don't want/need a body on frame 4x4 truck or SUV with their iffy handling, so-so brakes, monster weight and poor gas mileage.

2) CUVs are easier to get into. There are not as low as a sedan nor do they require the mountaineering skills needed to access many pickups.

3) CUVs are generally space efficient. More volume than a station wagon or a body on frame SUV and you don't have to bend down (wagon) or lift up what you are loading.

4) Yes, I've heard all the "They can't tow, they can't do proper offroading" comments. The truth of the market is that very few folks do either of those things.

5) Why are they called Crossovers? Because you cannot use the word that properly describes them as it is verboten in the mass US market. That word is Hatchback. Yes, I said it out loud. They are all large hatchbacks. There you are, I said it again.

Now barricading the doors to repel the Big 3 hit squad on its way for the use of the "H" word.
 
Last edited:
This^^ I took the old explorer to the mountains today. Does well off road and in deep snow,but the highway? Ugh! Damn thing wallows over 70 mph !!
 
5) Why are they called Crossovers? Because you cannot use the word that properly describes them as it is verboten in the mass US market. That word is Hatchback. Yes, I said it out loud. They are all large hatchbacks. There you are, I said it again.

Replace hatchback with station wagon and you nailed it.
 
My son has a high end special order Challenger from about 2007, I think. I don't actually know much about them, but I know it has a big engine and I know it will lay a strip of rubber in its first four gears. It was a little scary, in fact, last time I was in it. I bet the value of that thing took a jump today!
 
Here's the new Charger...

... called the Dodge Charger Daytona SRT® :rolleyes:

attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php


They implement a fake exhaust sound, just like the Porsche Taycan has. How pathetic is that?! And Porsche makes you pay extra for it... what a mess...

News | Dodge Garage

They hail the so called "800V Banshee propulsion system" but don't say anything about any kind of abilities.

Again, pushing gimmicks to the audience, rather than usability.

I'm out!
 

Attachments

  • 299813929_10160209511984485_6280412414724477972_n.jpg
    299813929_10160209511984485_6280412414724477972_n.jpg
    89 KB · Views: 298
  • 300203336_10160209512014485_8428457213776960758_n.jpg
    300203336_10160209512014485_8428457213776960758_n.jpg
    104.8 KB · Views: 295
  • 300010172_10160209511969485_5746094724705742088_n.jpg
    300010172_10160209511969485_5746094724705742088_n.jpg
    60.3 KB · Views: 294
  • 298835181_10159898086934985_2854554350429756687_n.jpg
    298835181_10159898086934985_2854554350429756687_n.jpg
    51.1 KB · Views: 297
  • 299312173_10159898083514985_2303656925393502770_n.jpg
    299312173_10159898083514985_2303656925393502770_n.jpg
    59.3 KB · Views: 293
Bleah. So not only do all cars look about the same today (except that sexy Challenger convertible), we're going to have to fuel them with coal. Almost makes me want to get a horse and buggy, fueled with grass.
 
Drove ... I mean .. had a few Dodge products back in the 90's
as far as I'm concerned Lee Iacocca still owes me a pair of walking shoes.

While I still have little faith in the brand, they have been trying to atone for the K car. Now they can never complete the journey to absolution.
 
Replace hatchback with station wagon and you nailed it.

I'm not sure which term carries the most stigma.:D

Station Wagon says "practical vehicle with no charisma owned by your parents in 60s and 70s" (Ford Country Squire), while hatchback says "dumpy, cheap and nasty, under powered vehicle you were forced to drive because of gas prices" (Dodge Omni).
 
I have a 2012 KIA Sportage Turbo CUV that has been a perfect vehicle. The only thing that it can't do compared to my '97 S10 Blazer is tow. I never towed anything with the Blazer and the KIA has 100 more HP and half again the gas mileage numbers. As said above, it is easy for me and my 82 year old Mom to get into and out of from the medium height. Has decent ground clearance, drives like a car more than a truck and has handled anything I have needed it to do. If I need to haul something too big for it there is always Moms old Honda Odyssey. Pull the seats and it is huge inside.
 
Drove ... I mean .. had a few Dodge products back in the 90's
as far as I'm concerned Lee Iacocca still owes me a pair of walking shoes.

While I still have little faith in the brand, they have been trying to atone for the K car. Now they can never complete the journey to absolution.
Had a car with a Chrysler transmission back in the 70s. Put 125000 miles on the thing and had to rebuild or replace the transmission 5 time about every 25000 miles. I will never have anything to do with a Chrysler product unless they cut me a check for about $5000 including interest. Then I might think about it. As for electric cars I am tired of everyone trying to shove them down our throats. If someone gave me a new $70000 electric car of any brand I would drive it as far as the closest Toyota dealer and trade it for a new Highlander or some such.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top