It can't be good! When younger folks struggle to even live on their own, I can't see a country club membership as being at the top of priorities.
When we moved here, quite some time ago now, my wife wanted me to "look into it". And so I did. They asked what I did for a living and I made my occupation sound fairly gross to ensure it would not go any further . It didn't. If it had, even my wife agreed the financial commitment, which was substantial, but I don't recollect the exact amount, was ridiculous.
I like a round of golf, but not that much. And, I might be wrong, but I would guess each round of golf must cost something. I don't think it can be free.
Not too long ago, they mailed me a flyer about joining. I didn't look into it further, and maybe it's cheaper than before, but it certainly can't be cheap. How can it be? All that land cost a lot, to maintain it even more.
I strongly support undeveloped land. But, if you have to develop it, a golf course has to be the next best thing. Not a development of homes, malls, warehouses, etc.
And so, the future can't be good. Can anyone prove me wrong?
A lament of the rich, far wealthier than I, except it might affect us all as the abandoned golf course doesn't usually revert back to field & forest, but more overdeveloped real estate.
Thoughts?
When we moved here, quite some time ago now, my wife wanted me to "look into it". And so I did. They asked what I did for a living and I made my occupation sound fairly gross to ensure it would not go any further . It didn't. If it had, even my wife agreed the financial commitment, which was substantial, but I don't recollect the exact amount, was ridiculous.
I like a round of golf, but not that much. And, I might be wrong, but I would guess each round of golf must cost something. I don't think it can be free.
Not too long ago, they mailed me a flyer about joining. I didn't look into it further, and maybe it's cheaper than before, but it certainly can't be cheap. How can it be? All that land cost a lot, to maintain it even more.
I strongly support undeveloped land. But, if you have to develop it, a golf course has to be the next best thing. Not a development of homes, malls, warehouses, etc.
And so, the future can't be good. Can anyone prove me wrong?
A lament of the rich, far wealthier than I, except it might affect us all as the abandoned golf course doesn't usually revert back to field & forest, but more overdeveloped real estate.
Thoughts?