Yes!
The DW is thought to be ugly.
I think the thin top strap on a S&W revolver is what makes it so good looking.
But if anybody can stand to own a Glock that is no consideration.
Back in the Steel Silhouette Shooting craze, the Dan Wesson took the prize too, too many times. The Smith shooters were heating up their loads and blowing out the top strap right at the 90* corner under the sight groove which, because of that cut, is even thinner there. The Dans kept running. I had a Model 29 at the time and decided to just leave be. In answer to that, IIRC, Smith beefed up the metallurgy of the top strap, the "29 classic", which helped, I think it was a good solution, but when I asked why not make the top strap thicker, somebody told me, "Then it would be just as ugly as a Dan Wesson!" Well, we can't have that.
My Dan Wesson is a model 15-2HB Pistol Pac.
I have a scope on the 8" BBL.
The 2.5" BBL can shoot those legendary, infamous 125 grain "one-shot manstoppers", those Federal HP's all day long and twice on Sundays
I don't really use the 6 incher except I used it to qualify.
The 4 incher goes in a cartridge belt holster which hangs by the bed, but I never wear it because almost always it is in CCW configuration.
It is extremely accurate!
It is terribly inaccurate also!
What??
You can dial in the sights to a more precise and accurate group than any gun I have ever seen in my life. But if you change barrels, or if you change ammo brands or projectiles, ya gotta do it all over again. It is such a task, that once I have it set, I don't want to change barrels. So now, I have set the sights for the 4" bbl and the 2.5" is close enough y'know? The scope is mounted on the 8" bbl shroud so you can set it for season and leave it. The iron sights are not a factor then. I have no idea where the 6" would even hit right now. My next CCW qual will be with my model 411 40 cal.
The rear sight is supposed to be wobbly. There is nothing wrong with it.
Is that everything?