The 1987 L-Frame Recall 586/686

Dump1567

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2003
Messages
2,461
Reaction score
4,921
Location
AZ
Late last month, I picked-up a good condition 1987 586-1 from a local shop for around $550. It came with the Pachmayr grips as shown, which are the same grips I use to run on my duty 686 in 1990/91 before switching to a Glock 17. It has some minor rust freckles, but otherwise a solid gun. For some reason, the side plate is polished more than the rest of the gun.

I noticed after I got it home, it didn't have the "M" stamp above the serial number. I've known about this recall for years, but never really looked into what it was about. After searching the internet, I found this excellent article by Revolver Guy detailing the work. If I understand correctly, shooting .357 ammo could pop out a primer enough to hang-up into the oversized firing pin hole and lock-up the gun. They replace the firing pin plate and hammer pin stud with a smaller one. I know people have shot thousands of rounds through these models without issue, but having plenty of other guns to shoot, I decided to send this 586 in for the recall.

Revolver Guy Article link:
The 1987 L-Frame Recall

As a result, when the 1987 Product Warning was issued, it applied to all “no-Dash” and “Dash-1” models of the 581, 586, 681 and 686 revolvers. Additionally, the special run of 686CS-1 revolvers that were designed for US Customs were also included in the list.

I emailed S&W and asked if they still do this recall modification. Without even answering yes or no, they just sent me a Fed ex 2 Day air return label. So, I assumed that was a yes. I removed the grips, boxed it up in a generic box, printed out the return label, and took it to my local Fed ex Hub to ship. S&W received it on June 2nd and sent a confirmation email. On June 19th, I received an email from Fed ex that SAW (S&W) had a package coming to me and it required an adult signature. It arrived back from S&W today in a S&W cardboard box (less than 3 week turn around).

The work had been performed and an "M" added above the serial number. The work performed just stated "within recall serial number range". It also showed signs that it had been test fired. The side plate didn't seem like it was fitting flush, so I disassembled it to look inside. What was weird was the hand (the part that pushes-up on the cylinder rachets to rotate the cylinder). It was attached to a stud that had been fitted into the trigger. And the hand was kind of loose on this stud. I've been inside 50+ S&W's over the years and haven't seen anything like it. Every hand I've seen has the pin attached. This was two pieces (hand loosely fitted to the pin/stud). Based on post #2, I guess this is a floating hand used by S&W for a few years. I put everything back together and everything worked as intended. With solid lock-up and timing. And now the side plate was fitting flush.

Once they remove the Stage 2 fire restrictions from my local area, I can finally get out and shoot this gun (along with a few other S&W's I've acquired recently).

I decided I'd share this info. for anyone that has an older 586/686 that falls under the recall serial number range & may want to send it in (if it doesn't already have an "M" stamp). Or you didn't even know a recall existed. I can't guarantee the turnaround time will be as quick as mine, but I was happy I didn't have to wait months to see this gun again.


IMG_1975.jpg
IMG_1976.jpg

IMG_1977.jpg

IMG_1978.jpg
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Floating hand, technology that didn't last long.

Thanks. Been in this game for years and never knew they existed. Not sure if I've ever had a gun with one in the past? Based on the year of this gun, it's probably original.
 
Do you know the serial number range that modification is suggested?

This is from the article:

As a result, when the 1987 Product Warning was issued, it applied to all “no-Dash” and “Dash-1” models of the 581, 586, 681 and 686 revolvers. Additionally, the special run of 686CS-1 revolvers that were designed for US Customs were also included in the list.
 
My 586 has had considerable use, mainly with my handloads almost exclusively using Federal primers and #2400 powder. I’ve never had a lick of trouble from it and never returned it for service. I probably should.

Odd that your sideplate looks so much different than the rest of the revolver. I suppose it’s a replacement, but of course who knows where, when, or by whom.

In any case, congrats on rounding up that one. All the 27 lovers will no doubt consider me a heretic, but nevertheless, the 586 is my favorite revolver to use with .357 magnums. The 19 gets that honor if shooting mostly .38s with low-end .357s through it every now and then. Both great revolvers, IMO. 👌
 
My 586 has had considerable use, mainly with my handloads almost exclusively using Federal primers and #2400 powder. I’ve never had a lick of trouble from it and never returned it for service. I probably should.

Odd that your sideplate looks so much different than the rest of the revolver. I suppose it’s a replacement, but of course who knows where, when, or by whom.

In any case, congrats on rounding up that one. All the 27 lovers will no doubt consider me a heretic, but nevertheless, the 586 is my favorite revolver to use with .357 magnums. The 19 gets that honor if shooting mostly .38s with low-end .357s through it every now and then. Both great revolvers, IMO. 👌

The barrel is also a little more polished than the frame, but not as much as that side plate.
 
Great info! I am a very harsh critic of S&W these days, and your experience sounds like a very good and successful one.

Props to S&W for doing this right.
 
Thanks. Been in this game for years and never knew they existed. Not sure if I've ever had a gun with one in the past? Based on the year of this gun, it's probably original.
IINM it was a change late 80s to about 1990 I learned about when I opened up my 625 model of 1989 and went🤔
I was actually changing the hand and I realized I had to convert to non floating style because I bought the wrong one. 🙃
 
Last edited:
My 586 has had considerable use, mainly with my handloads almost exclusively using Federal primers and #2400 powder. I’ve never had a lick of trouble from it and never returned it for service. I probably should.

Odd that your sideplate looks so much different than the rest of the revolver. I suppose it’s a replacement, but of course who knows where, when, or by whom.

In any case, congrats on rounding up that one. All the 27 lovers will no doubt consider me a heretic, but nevertheless, the 586 is my favorite revolver to use with .357 magnums. The 19 gets that honor if shooting mostly .38s with low-end .357s through it every now and then. Both great revolvers, IMO. 👌
Yes, the difference in finish of the side plate is very noticeable. Would actually kind of bother me, but maybe in time it will become less noticeable.
 
My 1981 purchased 586 6" never had an issue and never got sent back for the updated firing pin nose bushing.

My 1981 purchased 686 4" did go back for the updated firing pin nose bushing. My dad "appropriated" it and used it a little. I'm not sure if he had an issue or just sent it back to be sure after I told him about the issues we had in our department with the 686's we bought a year later.

In our department fully half the 686 4" revolvers had the issue with the hole in the firing pin nose bushing being too large and allowing the 125 grain .357 hollow points (department suggested ammo - we had to buy our own) primers to flow back into the nose bushing hole and lock up the cylinder. But we only sent back the defective revolvers at the time. That was, evidently, a couple years or more before the recall efforts were made.

One note - been a long time. It may have been late summer or early fall of 1982 I bought those two revolvers. I do know my 586 had a lot of influence in the Chief selecting the 686 revolvers when our department changed revolvers later. He liked it so well he ordered a 686 6" for himself and carried/shot it awhile before ordering the 686 4" guns for department carry.

They really are sweet guns and I doubt if anything made in the last 40 years shoots/functions any better.
 
Back
Top