BG 2.0 mini review

BLLefkay

Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2024
Messages
269
Reaction score
274
I bought a BG 2.0 when it first came out a year ago. On that particular gun, I had an edge/lip on lower feed ramp and had FTFs until I removed edge and polished both feed ramps. I had 3K rounds through that gun, got bored, sold it then went on a brief micro 9 journey.

I'm back with the BG 2.0 again with 2 range sessions under my belt. Gun has been flawless with all ammo and new Galloway rod.

Ammo through gun - 100 flat nose Winchester, 100 Fiocchi ball, 250 Sergeant Major steel cased & 20 Federal HST.IMG_5685.webp
 
Register to hide this ad
718 rounds through Bodyguard 2.0 with no failures. After 3 years shooting approximately 18,000 rounds with mostly micros, I still suck at 15 yards, lol!IMG_5712.webp
 
I few of those at 15 yards will get the point across to what's on the receiving end. I do about the same with a Taurus GX4, I blamed it on progressive bifocals and astigmatism LOL
I've been thinking about trying a BG 2.0 to downsize a little from the GX4....maybe for my birthday in November. I agree that bronze color is pretty unique, kinda like it.
 
I few of those at 15 yards will get the point across to what's on the receiving end. I do about the same with a Taurus GX4, I blamed it on progressive bifocals and astigmatism LOL
I've been thinking about trying a BG 2.0 to downsize a little from the GX4....maybe for my birthday in November. I agree that bronze color is pretty unique, kinda like it.
Boss I there! Started wearing glasses in 1993, I'm 65 now. I'm a scratch golfer and I won't go to the other side of the pin because my glasses will skew ****, lol!
 
At fifty damn feet, with a pocket gun? Don't beat yourself up. How do you do at expected self defense distances? For a tiny gun, the BG2.0 shoots mighty straight, but it's still tiny.
Moon
Don't practice at shorter distances although I doubt it's an issue. 👊
 
I bought a BG 2.0 when it first came out a year ago. On that particular gun, I had an edge/lip on lower feed ramp and had FTFs until I removed edge and polished both feed ramps. I had 3K rounds through that gun, got bored, sold it then went on a brief micro 9 journey.

I'm back with the BG 2.0 again with 2 range sessions under my belt. Gun has been flawless with all ammo and new Galloway rod.

Ammo through gun - 100 flat nose Winchester, 100 Fiocchi ball, 250 Sergeant Major steel cased & 20 Federal HST.View attachment 791452
They're making them in this color without a manual safety? It looks like it.
 
Update - I have to mention that when I shoot, I'm holding the gun comfortable, just enough to control it without flying out of my hands. Obviously, I know I could hold it more firmly BUT, 2 things, I'm at the range to have fun AND I know that during a high stress situation if I ever have to shoot, I'll be a clamping mo fo!
 
Update - I have to mention that when I shoot, I'm holding the gun comfortable, just enough to control it without flying out of my hands. Obviously, I know I could hold it more firmly BUT, 2 things, I'm at the range to have fun AND I know that during a high stress situation if I ever have to shoot, I'll be a clamping mo fo!
You react like you train.
 
You react like you train.
Training and muscle memory are words I've read over and over for 40+ years. At my age I know I lack training and I lack muscle memory.

There are too many factors to assume that any amount of training or muscle memory are going work as we want them to.

First, there are very few gun owners that actually train for a hypothetical defense situation.

How many times does the average civilian gun owner train multiple times a month, or a year?

NFL football players train extremely hard, yet they make mistakes every play and every game.

Being very familiar with handling your defense carry is vital, but that most likely will not be enough if an attack becomes a reality.

My range visits have zero correlation to a sudden unpredictable hypothetical self-defense event. However, a little bit of training and muscle memory is better than none.

This is a long read, however I found it very interesting...

Muscle memory is not a perfect or guaranteed process, and its accuracy is affected by several factors. The term itself is a bit misleading, as the "memory" actually involves the brain and nervous system strengthening neural pathways through repetition, which makes a movement more automatic and efficient over time.

Factors influencing the accuracy of muscle memory

The accuracy and reliability of learned physical skills depend on the conditions under which they were acquired and practiced.

  • Practice quality: Performing a movement incorrectly will develop "bad" muscle memory, making it difficult to correct later. This is why coaching and proper technique are crucial, especially for complex skills.
  • Repetition: The consistency and number of repetitions are key to solidifying neural pathways. Forgetting is a real phenomenon, and skills can degrade without consistent practice. For example, a cyclist who takes years off can get back on a bike but may lose the speed and endurance of their peak fitness.
  • Complexity of the skill: Simple, fundamental movements are retained more reliably than highly complex or intricate actions. For instance, basic movements like walking or balancing on a bike are rarely forgotten, but a complex, high-level skill like a figure skating routine is more susceptible to degradation.
  • Environmental variation: Real-world conditions are rarely identical. Skills rehearsed in a controlled environment may not be as accurate or automatic when faced with variables like stress, fatigue, or a different setting. An archer, for example, must account for factors like wind and distance.
  • Emotional and physical state: Factors like fatigue, anxiety, or stress can interfere with the brain's ability to execute a movement perfectly. An athlete might flinch or make an error under pressure, even if they have practiced a movement thousands of times.
  • Rest and recovery: Adequate sleep is essential for the consolidation of motor learning. The brain processes and reinforces newly learned motor skills during sleep, improving their accuracy and long-term retention.
  • Individual differences: Factors like age, genetics, and overall health all play a role in the speed of learning and the rate of retention. Younger individuals may develop and regain skills more quickly than older individuals, for example.
How the two types of muscle memory work

Scientific consensus recognizes two main processes behind what people call "muscle memory".

Motor learning (neurological memory)

  • What it is: The process by which the brain and nervous system learn to coordinate and control muscles to perform a specific movement. The repetition strengthens and optimizes the communication pathways between the brain and muscles.
  • How it feels: With enough practice, the movement feels automatic. The brain shifts its activity to areas that control automatic function, freeing up conscious thought.
  • Accuracy: This form is highly accurate but not foolproof. It can degrade over time without reinforcement, and poor technique can become ingrained, leading to long-term errors.
Cellular memory (physiological memory)
  • What it is: The ability of muscles to regain lost size and strength faster than they were first built, even after a long period of inactivity. This happens because resistance training increases the number of myonuclei (specialized cell nuclei) in muscle fibers, and many of these persist long after training stops.
  • How it feels: An athlete returning to training after an injury or long break will experience a surprisingly fast and efficient return to form.
  • Accuracy: This process is reliable for rebuilding strength and mass, but it does not mean that you can jump back to your peak physical condition instantly. The speed and accuracy of your physical skills will still be affected by the neurological component and overall fitness level.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top