Being refered to as a "Civilian" vs Citizen

Status
Not open for further replies.
bitstream said:
I don't know what Oath you took, but the Supreme Court says you don't have to give your life to protect others.
Click to expand...
Actually, SCOTUS says no LEO has to PROTECT you (outside of EXTREMELY limited circumstances), period, regardless of risk.

The being said, I've seen cops who wanted to protect the public. I've seen cops who couldn't care less in general. I've seen cops whose desire to protect was predictable by the color of the victim's skin. None of that really matters in the greater scheme of things.

What DOES matter is that in virtually no case will the police be ABLE to protect you from an imminent deadly force attack. Any threat the police ARE able to "protect" you from either isnt:
  1. imminent.
  2. a real danger to life and limb.

Good cop, bad cop, it doesn't matter. When your life is in danger RIGHT NOW, if you're not ready and willing to protect YOURSELF, you're just not going to get protected AT ALL. Any claim to the contrary is of a kind with belief in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy.
 
I guess it's Hayakawa time, even if I kind of disagree with him in other cases. "Words don't mean; people mean."

Sometimes LEOs use "civilian" to mean non-LEO. In normal face-to-face conversation in an unofficial setting, it would be impolite to interrupt him or her to make a statement about what the word meant, particularly if it were obvious anyway, and by the time there was a break where the comment could be made, no normal person would care, anyway.

If the LEO clearly used the word in a derogatory or demeaning way, that would be a slightly different issue to address in its own appropriate way, but it is usually not identical with the simple misuse of a word whose meaning is usually pretty clear where perhaps no other word is perfect, either.
 
Last edited:
cmort666 said:
Actually, SCOTUS says no LEO has to PROTECT you (outside of EXTREMELY limited circumstances), period, regardless of risk.
Click to expand...

Examine the context of the ruling. People were suing the police for injuries sustained while police were either not there, enroute there or unable to protect at the time (such as riots).

The SCOTUS ruled that police were unable to protect all citizens" all the time. This was a correct ruling since the police cannot protect all. There are more citizens than police. Police are not body guards that are hired to protect.

Police will usually protect a person if they can. However one local area officer was caught leaving a wounded citizen on the ground as her boyfriend was shooting at them. He got in his car and left the area. He was also later fired and sent to prison.
 
Model520Fan said:
BTW, I don't particularly care for the use of the word "veteran" for folks that don't have a CIB
Click to expand...

I have a CIB, I got mine with the 2/502nd Inf, 101st Abn Div RVN 67-68.
I'm no more a veteran then those in the rear who supported me. The ones who got mortored or rocketed every night but still took the time go get my re-supply to the chopper pad.

I'm no more a veteran then the medics, nurses and doctors who tended to my comrades. Nor the chopper pilots who brought me ammo and carried off the wounded when things got rough.

I'm no more a veteran then the combat engineer, or medic or FO who was by my side while I was earning my CIB.

The paratroopers at Bastonge who carried an infantry MOS were no more veterans then the cooks and clerks they shared foxholes with when surrounded by three German Armored Divisions.

The Marines in the Pacific are no more veterans then the army aircorp, just read somewhere where more army air corp people then Marines were killed WWII.

I'm proud of my CIB, but I totally disagree with your statement that only holders of CIBs are veterans.
 
Strictly speaking, the only people in this country who are not civilians are Active Duty military personnel. LEOs ARE civilians, although "sworn officers" if you want to make that distinction. And they often have to deal with people who are NOT citizens.
A veteran is anyone who raised their right hand, promised to "protect and defend.." and was honorably discharged. I have the CIB but I do not look down on those who don't have it, either due to time and place or just weren't eligible for it.
 
kraigwy said:
I have a CIB, I got mine with the 2/502nd Inf, 101st Abn Div RVN 67-68.
I'm no more a veteran then those in the rear who supported me. The ones who got mortored or rocketed every night but still took the time go get my re-supply to the chopper pad.

I'm no more a veteran then the medics, nurses and doctors who tended to my comrades. Nor the chopper pilots who brought me ammo and carried off the wounded when things got rough.

I'm no more a veteran then the combat engineer, or medic or FO who was by my side while I was earning my CIB.

The paratroopers at Bastonge who carried an infantry MOS were no more veterans then the cooks and clerks they shared foxholes with when surrounded by three German Armored Divisions.

The Marines in the Pacific are no more veterans then the army aircorp, just read somewhere where more army air corp people then Marines were killed WWII.

I'm proud of my CIB, but I totally disagree with your statement that only holders of CIBs are veterans.
Click to expand...
You're right. I'll edit my post and my attitude.
 
I pretty much go with Sir or Ma'am...

Would not an elected LE official, i.e. Sheriff & deputies serve that jurisdiction's 'constituents' ?


The next to the last time I signed on was to serve felony warrants and raid meth labs,
all the whilist trying not to get blown up or kilt.


Su Amigo,
Dave
 
Last edited:
oldman45 said:
He was also later fired and sent to prison.
Click to expand...
That's got to be an outcome so vanishingly rare as to rate right up there with the Patterson bigfoot video.

Fired... in RARE occasions. PROSECUTED? I'd expect to see a flying saucer first. I don't believe that the two Milwaukee cops who gave the naked Laotian kid back to Jeffrey Dahmer were fired, much less prosecuted.
 
its no biggie. Also note than many LEOs come from a military background and carry some of that verbiage for life. Civilian = non-LEO and non-military. too old to change that thinking. Doesn't mean I'm going to address a civilian as 'Mr Civilian' or treat them any worse.
 
cmort666 said:
That's got to be an outcome so vanishingly rare as to rate right up there with the Patterson bigfoot video.

Fired... in RARE occasions. PROSECUTED? I'd expect to see a flying saucer first. I don't believe that the two Milwaukee cops who gave the naked Laotian kid back to Jeffrey Dahmer were fired, much less prosecuted.
Click to expand...

The officer pulled up on another officer in shots fired / hostage situation. There is a video of it on the internet.

http://arklatexhomepage.com/fulltext?nxd_id=169356

The officer saw what was happening, ran to his car and got out of Dodge. This was captured on dash cam. Then in court, after being terminated, he denied he was even there although he was shown the video. He was charged with perjury. found guilty and sent to prison for four full years.

Fired Officer Sentenced For Perjury | News - Home
 
Last edited:
I've always felt it was improper for LEOs to refer to any non-LEOs as "civilians". IMO, all LEOs are civilians...some (or indeed, many) LEOs may be veterans, but they must surely be civilians (with the possible exception of LEOs who are also serving in NG or Reserve units.)

To my mind, regardless of the oath taken, there are enormous differences between Military Members and LEOs. LEOs do not travel thousand of miles to serve and fight on foreign lands. LEOs sleep in their own beds each night, have dinner with their families, see their children daily. If LEOs don't care for the way things are going at some point, they may merely throw down their badges, and walk away. LEOs don't end up buried in foreign lands, where their families may never visit their graves, nor do they end up MIA, where their families may never know their fate, nor are they ever POWs.

This should not be construed in any way as my lacking respect and appreciation for LEOs and the jobs that they do. I have several friends who are, or have been, in LE. I just don't believe that they should place themselves in the same classification as servicemen or women.

Tim
 
RonJ said:
I was in the military in the mid to late sixties. Excluding older folks it was a sort of hippies vs soldiers thing. In that context civilian was equivalent to outsider. Even today I feel the same way when I hear the word.
Click to expand...

A close friend of mine did multiple tours in Vietnam and right up until he died, about 20 yr's ago, whenever he used the word, civilian, he would spit on the ground.
 
Its hard to convince me that "friend" joined the military to protect the "civilians" that he would spit on the ground when the word come up. Was he a NCO? (No chance on the outside)
 
Things that make you say hmmm

I usually say Sir or Maam in the line of duty; but for the federal law enforcement agency that I work for we really can't tell if any of the people that we encounter are "Citizens" (of the USA) until we see their passport or other proof of citizenship.

Of course at the international border crossing things are a little different!

For many years (before my time) the non-law enforcement community has been referred to as "civilians" - not as a derogatory term but to distinguish them from law enforcement peronnel.
 
These posts seem for the most part to be full of over sensitivity and who's Johnson is bigger c.r.a.p. to me. Newsflash for all....We all have the same rights and standing under the Constitution, which was the point of that wonderful document. Check the egos would be my thought......
 
I looked at Webster's Dictionary to see how they define civilian. It said that a civilian is anyone who is not military, police or fire fighter. Truth is I'm not bothered by a LEO calling me a civilian. But please don't refer to me as "the accused".
 
Here is the oath that I and other Federal employees took when hired :

"Oath
I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

5 U.S.C. §3331"

BTW, I like the term citizen as opposed to civilian. I agree with others who see civilian in the context being discussed as problematic as it reinforces the us versus them issue which is acceptable when differentiating between cops and crooks but is inappropriate when describing law abiding citizens. I always liked it when Joe Friday called us citizens.
 
feralmerril said:
Its hard to convince me that "friend" joined the military to protect the "civilians" that he would spit on the ground when the word come up. Was he a NCO? (No chance on the outside)
Click to expand...

The way he had been treated by some civilians when he returned home left a bad taste in his mouth. Being called things like "baby killer" & getting spit on while wearing his uniform & "green beenie" didn't help matters any.

He said he wasn't lookin' for any thanks, just being left alone would have been thanks enough.

He was wounded 5 times over in Vietnam, with what he called "the big one", an AK47 round to the right hip in 1968.

He sacrificed for his Country & look at the thanks he, as well as many others, got. (my words)
 
In the second section of the Declaration of Independence is a list of grievances against King George III. One of the listed grievances is: He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power. To me this clearly divides military from civilian and Civil power would include both politicians and LEOs.

Unless you're subject to the UCMJ your Civilian. IMHO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

ENNE-FRAME
REVISED a nice story of a Money Order and Mister X
Replies
6
Views
417
Onomea
Onomea
Retired W4
First Air Force One Being Restored
Replies
6
Views
539
Alk8944
Alk8944
B
Tom Brady as "analyst"
Replies
16
Views
765
Breadman1
B
LVSteve
Am I being overly suspicious?
2 3
Replies
51
Views
2K
rockquarry
R
D
iPhone vs computer
Replies
4
Views
129
bbqsauce
bbqsauce

Latest posts

Back
Top