A DSC Snubnose Victory -- UPDATED WITH NEW SWHF INFO

Joined
Dec 26, 2007
Messages
13,065
Reaction score
7,563
Location
Orange County, CA
CUMULATIVE UPDATE TO 15 AUG 2020: The recent receipt of new information from the Smith & Wesson Historical Foundation allows a better understanding of how this gun (and two others like it) came to be produced. The original letter of authenticity from late 2012 said this gun had been shipped to Jack Reeve of Paris, TX on 14 Apr 1945 as part of a 100-unit order. Barrel lengths were not distinguished. New documents allow us to see that Jack Reeves (not Reeve) was the Police Chief of Paris at that time, and we may conclude from a letter exchange that Reeves, through the DSC, had requested only four .38 Special Victory revolvers with four-inch barrels and three .38 Special Victory revolvers with two-inch barrels. I invite readers to jump to Post 43 in this thread, where the new documents are presented.

Previous updates to the initial post in this thread have been deleted as the the new documents correct and extend prior conclusions and suggestions.

It's interesting to set this gun's shipment in a historical framework. Two days earlier (April 12, 1945) President Roosevelt had died in Warm Springs, Georgia. Adolph Hitler was in his third to last week as an underground resident of Berlin. And the War in the Pacific was less than four months away from coming to an abrupt end.

Some of my baseless speculations in the early parts of this thread have not been edited out. The documents take precedence in pointing to the proper understanding of this revolver.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

This came to me recently, and since these are not commonly seen I thought I would post a few pics.

V629214, shipped April 1945. It's a Defense Supplies Corporation gun, according to company historian Roy Jinks, which is consistent with the lack of US PROPERTY markings on the top strap. DSC guns were not considered to be government owned.

dcwilson-albums-snubnose-victory-v629214-pics-and-docs-picture22162-snubvic-r.jpg


dcwilson-albums-snubnose-victory-v629214-pics-and-docs-picture22163-snubvic-l.jpg



It does have have the flaming bomb (butt, to left of serial number) and P (top left rear frame, rear cylinder surface). Serial number is on butt, barrel and cylinder. (Addendum: Also on rear yoke face and underside of ejector star.)

dcwilson-albums-snubnose-victory-v629214-pics-and-docs-picture22164-snubvic-butt.jpg


dcwilson-albums-snubnose-victory-v629214-pics-and-docs-picture22165-snubvic-cyl-rear.jpg


dcwilson-albums-snubnose-victory-v629214-pics-and-docs-picture22166-snubvic-barrel-serno.jpg



Barrel markings are correct:

dcwilson-albums-snubnose-victory-v629214-pics-and-docs-picture22167-snubvic-barel-rm.jpg



The MADE IN U.S.A. stamp has been painted white, or some other color that has now faded to near white.

dcwilson-albums-snubnose-victory-v629214-pics-and-docs-picture22168-snubvic-madein.jpg


The question arises later in this thread which hammer block safety is used in this revolver. This photo shows the non-stepped profile connected with guns manufactured before the mandated safety redesign of January 1945.

dcwilson-albums-snubnose-victory-v629214-pics-and-docs-picture22169-snubvic-hammer-profile.jpg



This gun is not without ambiguities. I think it is in original configuration, but there are four inch Victory revolvers that were known to have been rebarreled as two-inchers. This could be one of those arsenal rebuilds/conversions.

The stocks are not original. They are numbered (clumsily, even erratically) 584402. They don't fit the frame very well, as can be seen in the photos.

The lanyard loop is perhaps not original. It is restrained by a loop of wire rather than a proper pin, and it is (I believe) incorrectly finished. Weren't these also parked on the Victory revolvers?

The gun may have been re-parkerized as the trigger return spring stud has been polished flat to the frame. But the frame and barrel markings were not aggressively polished and still look strong.

Screw slot damage shows that the sideplate has been off. I won't look inside the gun until I get some better finger control going in my right hand, but I will add photos in the future if there is anything there worth looking at.

The gun seems to have been fired little (if at all) since it received its current finish; there are no powder rings on the front of the cylinder and no cartridge slap marks on the recoil shield.

I will try to add a little history about two-inch Victory revolvers in a subsequent post, maybe tomorrow.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
HI David,
It looks legit to me! I think these are somewhat more difficult to fake than people think as getting the serial number font on the barrel flat correct would be a difficult task. Infrequently are these offered for sale, so congratulations as its a nice one!
LG
 
David, nice find. I've been on the lookout for one of these a while, but the funds and gun seem not to be together at the same time...ah, the joys of collecting.
 
Gee David, I don't think it could be evaluated any better. What was or is the Defense Supply Corp. and government or private?
 
What was or is the Defense Supply Corp. and government or private?

The Defense Supplies Corporation (sorry, I got the name wrong in the first post and have now changed it) was a subsidiary of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, a government agency. (Or quasi-governmental; RFC was a centerpiece agency of the New Deal.). Among the DSC's responsibilities was procurement and distribution of security supplies for law enforcement agencies and critical industries during WWII.

With the exception of a peculiar 500-unit OSS order in August 1944 from which no guns have been found or identified, all two-inch Victory revolvers were DSC purchases. There was one DSC order for 300 guns in October 1942, and another one in early 1944 for 500 units. No other orders are known. It is possible that not all authorized units were produced. The DSC had to apply to the War Department for approval to manufacture specific runs of particular configurations.

Four-inch DSC Victory revolvers are far more frequently encountered.

Most of what is known about these uncommon models comes from Charles W. Pate's U.S. Handguns of World War II. I also thank forum member ordnanceguy for helping me understand some of the basic information about this rarely seen class of Victory revolvers.

ADDENDUM: some of what I say in this post is wrong. See lower posts for better info.
 
With the exception of a peculiar 500-unit OSS order in August 1944 from which no guns have been found or identified, all two-inch Victory revolvers were DSC purchases.

David,

Are you sure about this part?

Nice gun, btw. Congratulations.

Thanks,
Kevin Williams
 
Kevin, I am open to correction if I got that wrong, but that's how I interpret the Pate information: 800-1300 total production (or authorization, because Pate is open to the notion that not all were built), with the 500-unit uncertainty connected with the OSS order of August 1944: do those guns really exist?

300 guns were authorized in October 1942 for DSC receipt and distribution (reportedly for the DOJ, which I take to mean FBI), and 500 more in May of 1944 -- again for the DSC. There is a flyer from 1944 that Charlie Flick has shown me that talks about these two-inch revolvers as a DSC production run.

I wouldn't be surprised if somebody showed me a two-inch Vic with Navy or other US stampings on it, but in my current state of knowledge I would not expect to see such a gun.

Somebody please clue me in if I need educating, because I would really like to understand these two-inch V-guns better.

ADDENDUM: I just found a reference to the guns of the October 1942 Contract being marked UNITED STATES PROPERTY, which strikes me as inconsistent with a DSC order. Yet in another place I see that order specifically identified as a DSC order. So something needs to be better understood or corrected.
 
Last edited:
David,

I'm not challenging you--just trying to resolve the same ambiguity from Pate's information. Hopefully Charlie will come along and straighten us out.

Regards,
Kevin Williams
 
David, Hopefully Charlie will come along and straighten us out. Regards,
Kevin Williams

David and Kevin:

Thanks for the vote of confidence but for now the question of 2 inch barreled OSS Victories remains unresolved in my mind. They may well exist, as suggested by Charlie Pate, but so far none have surfaced and no serials have been reported. Other OSS guns, including Victories, are well known to collectors but I have never seen or heard of a genuine 2 inch OSS Victory. The factory records are probably going to be the final arbiter on this issue, but as far as I know Roy has not mentioned finding any 2 inch OSS-shipped Victories in the shipping ledgers. (The 4 inch OSS shipped Victories show up in the ledgers as such.)

Earlier this week I sent David a copy of the S&W flyer seen below which is in my collection. It makes pretty clear how the DSC had authorized S&W to sell 2 inch barreled Victories for those who qualified, those customers being primarily civilian law enforcement agencies. My expectation is that David's new 2 inch gun will letter as going to a law enforcement agency.

The 1942 shipped 2 inch guns went to Fort Mason, in San Francisco Bay. They are indeed marked on the left topstrap "UNITED STATES PROPERTY". They are USGI guns.

I have never seen an example of the 2 inch guns that reportedly went to the Dept. of Justice either, and none show up in the Victory Model Database.

2inchVictoryModelFlyer.jpg
 
Last edited:
My expectation is that David's new 2 inch gun will letter as going to a law enforcement agency.

Charlie,

I think you're most likely correct in your assumption that David's "New Toy" is going to Letter to a Law Enforcement Agency!!

Reason I mention it is I show a fairly large order (Over 100) V-Prefix Serial No.'d 38 M&P Revolvers in close proximity to his as being shipped to the NYCPD (New York City Police Dept.) on 12/21/45!! Sorry to say there is no mention as to David's Serial No., or the Barrel Lengths of any of them, but imagine they'd have been mixed between the Two Barrel Lengths!! Don't you??

It will be interesting to hear if David's Revolver was one that isn't listed, but shipped there as well!!
 
I too think it likely that this gun went to a PD or Sheriff's Department. I'll report back when I find out. This one shipped in April of 1945, just under a year after the DSC authorization alluded to in Charlie's flyer.

It appears that I developed a completely wrong idea about the 1942 order of 300 two-inch Victory revolvers. Looks like that had to have been a military order, and I don't understand how the DOJ could have received any guns from it. I saw at least one gun from this order (serial numbers scattered in the V175000-V177000 range) described as "OSS gun." I'm not sure if that designation is intended loosely or precisely; certainly the OSS was a very young agency at the time of the 1942 shipments to Fort Mason. Would they have received armaments there for the operations they were setting up in China?

Unless there are other DSC orders involving two-inch Victories that have not yet come to light, it now appears to me that the May 1944 DSC order for 500 units is the only one that produced such guns for stateside law enforcement agencies.
 
This one shipped in April of 1945, just under a year after the DSC authorization alluded to in Charlie's flyer.

David,

I did see that you had your's listed as being shipped in April of 1945, but was more trying to give you an idea that it may have had the possibility of being shipped to the NYCPD as literally "Hundreds" & "Hundreds" of these DSC Revolvers were shipped to them during the time these were being produced!!

I guess time will tell "The Rest Of The Story"!! Whatever the outcome it's a "Beauty" for sure!!
 
David,

I forgot to mention to you a bit ago that I believe the OSS term is a actual designation given the fact that the data I'm using for reference is military information & the few I've found in the 175,000-177,000 Serial No. Range are listed as such in those records!! Although I have no idea what the Barrel Lengths were as I stated earlier!!

By the way, the earliest "OSS" shipped Revolver I have found so far was 54659 & is listed as being shipped to OSS-SSO-Washington 12/14/42!! It's really hard to decipher some of the abbreviations they use so you're on your own here!! I'm assured it's Wash. DC, but the SSO is a mystery!! Social Security Office maybe??? I realize this is most certainly not one of the Two-Incher's, but I wasn't sure if you were trying to track down any & all OSS Revolvers or not so I thought I'd mention it!!
 
SSO stood for Strategic Services Operations. The various field operations branches reported to the SSO.

Masterpiece, perhaps I missed it but what is the source of the records you are deciphering?

Thanks,
Kevin Williams
 
This gun is not without worries. I think it is in original configuration, but there are four inch Victory revolvers that were known to have been rebarreled as two-inchers. This could be one of those arsenal rebuilds/conversions.
I doubt the arsenal would have numbered a replacement barrel, and even if they did, I have never seen them use those tiny stamps.




The stocks are not original. They are numbered (clumsily, even erratically).....
The sloppy numbering is quite common on Vics, like done by a drunk blindfolded, but not on all. So, there might have been more than one person numbering them. The drunk survived the war and was there into the early 50's, judging by the numbers on SOME of the 5 screw Masterpieces. :D


The lanyard loop is not original. It is restrained by a loop of wire rather than a proper pin, and it is (I believe) incorrectly finished. Weren't these also parked on the Victory revolvers?
Can we talk about swivels?
I thought it was impolite to mention, like hemorrhoids or somethin.....:rolleyes:
Since you said it first, there are actually THREE verified varieties, and I suspect FOUR are possible. :D
1- Originally, swivels have a pin through the lump or boss to keep the loop centered. It is ground flush. Swivels were always case hardened, but don't expect a lot of vivid colors.
2- June 1, 44 Engi. Order eliminated pin- "new method makes pin unnecessary". I suppose that means there is a partition in the hole for the loop and the loop is folded in. If anyone has one with no pin, tear the loop out and tell us please. :D
3- Dec 20, 44 Engi Order changed Case colr to sandblast blue because case colors were not uniform. Duuuuhhhhhhh.

4- Obviously, we can assume that IF any old bosses with pin holes were found late in the game, there MIGHT be some pinned swivels that were sandblast blue.





I believe the gun has been re-parkerized as the trigger return spring stud has been polished flat to the frame. But the frame and barrel markings were not aggressively polished and still look strong.
Wartime rebound studs are often below flush or ground flat.
Apr 7, 42 Engi Order to "Change length of rebound stud to length of stop stud for sandblasted guns only"
I added two pics of rebound studs on guns I believe to be original.

Screw slot damage shows that the sideplate has been off.
All that proves is all that it proves- the sideplate has likely been off.
People tinker.
People open them up when they get dropped in a creek, or the mud, or get a drink spilled on them.
I opened my first S&W when I was 14 (my gun) cause I wanted to see what made it tick. That gun, btw, was a 4", 5 Screw Pre-29 that I bought used from Bob Berryman when his whole operation consisted of two showcases in a hardware store in East Point, Ga. ;) (He made my Mom come in and 'take possession')
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2767.jpg
    IMG_2767.jpg
    88.7 KB · Views: 131
  • 013.JPG
    013.JPG
    173.7 KB · Views: 129
Last edited:
I was happy enough before Lee's post. Now I'm happier.

Hypercritical after the Mexican fiasco, I guess. Thank you for the insights and corrections to my hasty judgments.

The work of the Blindfolded Drunk:

IMG_1032.jpg
 
Back
Top