Remember when the term ".38 Special" mean't a serious service revolver?

Another LEO that started back in the '70's. In my agency the 38 Special it was recognized that you were going to need several rounds to stop a determined attacker.

Officers that were serious about surviving gunfights carried .357 Magnum ammo and if they really flush a Colt Python or S&W Model 27.
 
.38 Special a serious service cartridge-no, a capable service cartridge- yes.
Even as far back as the early 1930's the search was on for a more powerful cartridge leading to the .38/44 and then the .357 Magnum.
 
Others would say that "honor" would go to the 9mm.

The .38 Special would probably be in the running for the most for a revolver cartridge but the lowly .22 would probably be the winner.
 
Many shooters today think that they can use "spray-and-pray" in place of careful shot placement. They frequently use the "I'm being attacked by multiple assailants" argument. This has elevated high-cap semi-automatic pistols to fashion statements.

A low capacity .38 Special can handle multiple assailants at close range just fine. Bernie Goetz shot 4 attackers on the NY Subway in less than a minute with a S&W Model 37. None of them continued to attack him..........
 
Others would say that "honor" would go to the 9mm.

The .38 Special would probably be in the running for the most for a revolver cartridge but the lowly .22 would probably be the winner.

I read some where, several years ago that more homicides have been committed with the .22RF than any other round. However, cannot provide the source of that info.

Also, in my earlier post I neglected to recognize the OP, it is an excellent tribute to the OP's father. Good job.
 
My first handgun was a nickel plated 6" Model19...still my favorite pistol. we have 3 snub 38's one stainless, one blued, one hammerless alloy (my CCW piece)... a friend of mine used to talk about how a 38 wasn't big enough...I always asked him how he'd feel about getting shot with one of those lowly 38's....long pause....as powerful as a 44, hell no, but good enough to do the job if you do yours....certainly.
 
Wonderful thread, wonderful story and bond with your dad.

I loaned, (gave really but he always referred to the "gun I loaned him") to my dad years ago, a Colt Police Positive Special in .38 Special. My mom asked to keep it after he died. We were visiting today and she related how much he liked the revolver.

I started with the 357 mag back in the day, and now carry a M&P 45 ACP as duty sidearm, but have shot many, many rounds with the 38 and it is an adequate defense round.
 
Had a 1911 as issued when first in the Navy. Since 1967 I always had at least one .38 Spl. Never felt that under gunned especially after the Super-Vel ammo came out.
Now have at least 7 or 8. They seem to multiply somehow.... :)
 
The only 38 Specials I have are 38/44s and the only 38 Special cases I load are 38/44 loads. I really like the old 38/44, i.e. a 158g @ 1100-1150 fps.

Started my LEO career carrying a M28-2 loaded with Magnums. When I got off probation I qualified with a Government Model and carried one model or another of Colt 45 ACP from them until well after retirement.

Dave
 
I have them. A 2" J-frame for EDC and a fixed-sight 4" K for home defense. Both .38 Special, both stoked with the old FBI load. Everything I need and nothing I don't, to quote a phrase I read here fairly often.

In my younger days (I'm just a few years behind you shouldazagged) I've had guns stacked high in the corner, couldn't even remember all that I had. Some I sold or traded without ever even having shot, carried, or had outta the box. Sad. Wasteful.

Now, I have what shoulda has, plus a 38 snubbie for Ms. Gunslinger. And I have never felt better protected.

I'm with you shouldazagged, everything I need and nuttin' I don't
 
My dad never shot or taught me to shoot. He just didn't like guns. I learned to shoot from LEO friends in my early 20s back in the early 1980s. At the time most of the LEOs I knew were switching from revolvers-.38s and .357s--to semi autos. I learned to shoot on S&W .38s--Colts were too expensive. We called the 686 a "poor man's Python"

The thing is, after all these years I've kept my .38/.357 wheelguns, usually shooting +Ps, and an older 1911 clone. I've had hi-cap 9mms but seem to have no problem trading those off. Lately I've "accumulated" a couple of M10-8s instead of the poly wonders.
 
The .38 is the Rodney Dangerfield of cartridges..... I bet the majority of .357 magnum guns out there are loaded with 5-8 .38 specials... maybe +P or +P+ but still .38s.

I will admit that most of the time my 3inch 66 is stoked with +P .38s. I want to know I've got a fast 2nd shot!

Heck ..... what's the line from Magnum Force where we learn Dirty Harry is really carrying down loaded .44 magnums....... LOL... .44 Specials ...... for better control...............

Edit: does anyone make a 38/44 hollow point load these days.... ????
 
I read some where, several years ago that more homicides have been committed with the .22RF than any other round. However, cannot provide the source of that info.

I've always heard more people have been killed with .22's than any other round, most likely because more of those rounds shot than any other. Don't know if there's any stats to back this one up either. May be just another urban legend! :rolleyes:
 
I love 38s (used to look down on them. A 38 snub if you will :D ). They have a place in SD firearms I just dont think that place is front and center.

Being in police service for 75 years doesnt mean much to me. Most cops arnt gun guys. The gun is just part of the uniform. They unholster them for qualifications oncr or twice a year and thats it. It could just as easily be a BB gun. Plus the fact that a lot of the time it was "politics" that mandated what was carried and not real world results. Like someone else mentioned about departments being afraid to issue 357 magnums. It could have been any caliber but it ended up being a 38.

My personal belief is that the 38 is the 380 of the revolver world. No one would carry a 380 if it was the size of a 5906. So why carry a 35oz 4 in barrel 38? They shine as light, short barrel carry guns. If im going to carry something over 3 in barrel or that has a weight of a 1911 I might as well carry a 357 and get tge most use out of it. I find the 3 inch barrel mark to be the cutoff for both the 38/357. A 38 up to 3 inches and 357 starting from....

If im carrying a 357 it will be loaded with 357. No sense in downloading.

Now this is strictly from a practical carry point of view. If you buy to collect thats a different story
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 2
 
I grew up in the late 60s and 70s and always saw the law carry 357mag pistols.Now I really like the 38 and 357 mag rounds.I reload and cast for them.to me they are the best. I carry a 38spl daily.
 
Earlier in this thread, I posted a short note regarding an agency I worked for that issued the .38 spl. The other two agencies I worked for allowed the officers to choose their own sidearms (within certain parameters). In both agencies, the number of officers that chose the .38 spl. for themselves was zero. I have to agree with the late Elmer Keith's observation on the .38 spl. and it's long run in law enforcement. "Because of the round's excellent inherent accuracy, low recoil, and the most excellent "K-frame" revolvers it is usually issued in. The 38 special will always be the favorite of the police bureaucrats and all the others who have never had to actually use the weapon in the line of duty". Amen.
 
Back
Top