Revolvers are for women.

ccalda

Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Messages
13
Reaction score
6
Am I lost? I am confused or missing out on some information that others have and I don't? I hear this so often in gun stores, gun shows, forum, and other avenues where guns are mentioned and discussed.

On what seems to be a continuous basis I hear or read people say "when my wife needs it all she has to do is pull the trigger and it will go bang", or "when I'm not home my wife won't have to worry about jams or racking a slide, she just needs to pull the trigger". Is this something that men don't want also? During a self defense encounter would a jam or other malfunction be something men would not mind encountering or won't affect their ability to properly defend themselves? Perhaps during a violent self defense encounter an unfortunate malfunction would cause a man to gracefully dive under a parked vehicle while performing a tap, rack, bang technique in midair, while a woman would stand there and scream?

Perhaps there is a legitimate view that some females do not have an interest in wanting to learn how to operate a more complex weapon or learn a series of functions needed to make a semi-automatic handgun operational. Perhaps some women want to learn but are lacking a willing teacher.

At the end of the day I fail to understand why any individual male or female would give a simple and reliable tool to a fellow loved one while walking out the door with the same tool fashioned in higher complexity.
 
Register to hide this ad
When I sold guns, I regularly sold semi-autos to women. I would hand them a variety of guns and have them try them out. The only issue I ever ran into was that some petite women could not effectively manipulate the slide of some pistols. In those cases, I tended to recommend a revolver and they tended to prefer them.

Women are remarkably smart and are quite capable of selecting their own handguns. My wife prefers single stack semi-autos most of the time, but her favorite is a friend's Novak's built Hi-Power. I know, and more importantly she knows, that she can run a semi-auto better than most chauvinistic pigs out there. I've long chalked the "revolvers are for women" or "simple guns are better for women" mentality up to an inferiority complex of certain men and a general belief that women will train less with firearms. My wife does shoot less than I do, but we work on drills together frequently.

Also, if you think "revolvers are for women" try guns that have "Lady" in the name. I remember being in a, now defunct, gun shop here in the Austin area 4 or 5 years ago. They had a nice 3913LS on the shelf and I asked to "see the Lady Smith". The buffoon behind the counter said, "Lady Smith?! You know that's a woman's gun don't ya?" To which I replied, "Is that right? Well, I already have one of these "women's guns" and it puts 124-grain hollow points exactly where I want them." Then I gave him that look that says, "No, I won't be spending any money in here today."

-Rob
 
never heard that before. My 4"686 looks pretty manly when its got a huge fireball coming out of the barrel with full house loads. And then on the other side of the spectrum Ive got some .38 specials loaded that my 6 year old daughter could comfortably shoot, so i guess it could go either way.
 
You are probably right about there being a bit of chauvinism behind some of the advice given out but, the reason I chose a revolver for each of my daughters, is the revolver's simplicity and ease of use. By the way, that's also why I carry one.

My reasoning in selecting a revolver for my daughters is, if they fail to practice as much as they should, they can still pick the gun up and load, unload and shoot it. The revolver is just simpler.
 
On the legitimate side, I think most women just aren't into guns nearly as much as most men, and leaving out sex, less interest/effort on training does imply simpler is better (even more than normally).

On the less legitimate side, yes, I think there is some bias out there for sure, just like men used to talk trash about female drivers.

Personally, I am a man, and work in R&D with a science PhD, and am a computer systems designer for research applications... but I still like revolvers better, and it's not the only factor, but yes, I think that simplicity is good (in general). I don't just think that about guns, I think that about all devices and interfaces, it's one of the marks of good design - simplicity.

Complexity is never a virtue. It's something to be increased only when you're getting something really valuable back in return.
 
Last edited:
I started out my career in LE with a .357 model 66 in 1971 with a model 60 for off duty and then went to a 2.5" 66 later on when in plain clothes in the early 80's. I then went to a 1911 or some sort for 25years. Now that I am retired from LE I have gravitated back to carrying a revolver most all the time. I do have a 1911 and just purchased a 9mm Shield as well. My wife tried a couple of semi autos and then decided that she prefered the simplicity of a revolver so she now has a Lady Smith model 60 and prefers if to a semi auto. It was her choice, not mine and that is how it should be.Too many guys seem to lead the wife or SO toward something they think they should have. If a semi auto works for her and feels right, so be it.

Tom
 
Given a choice, I'd rather start most new shooters on a double-action revolver--male and female. That's just my prejudice, and I freely admit it. I like the relative safety of a long, double-action trigger for newer shooters. And I like the necessary discipline of keeping the front sight in focus and on target through that long pull. I don't believe it's particularly difficult to learn that bit of hand-eye coordination (at least at an elementary level) and it is easily transferable to other platforms.

I also confess a fondness for 3", steel, heavy-barreled J frame guns for beginning shooters with smaller hands-again male and female. While I would never attempt to force this platform on a new shooter of either gender, I still think a properly loaded .38 special of this type serves many folks well.

On the flip side, I have a friend in her early 60's whose military "expert" son-in-law, a new gun employee at a big box sporting good store, pressured her to buy an air-weight J frame snubby. I cringe when I think about how she's likely to react as a brand new shooter.

As for gender bias, I've developed one: In our small club, new female shooters regularly outperform their male counterparts. :)

PC
 
Seriously? Just consider it one of the "brighter" statements made by some ignorant and most likely lonely fool! Kyle
 
Back
Top