S&W 500 Just for Fun - 4" or 8"?

Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
I'd like to get a 500 just for fun. No bears & no hunting - just paper punching and Watermelon vaporizing. I'm 47, 6' 5", big hands and not recoil sensitive. The only place I could see keeping it with me is on the deer lease holstered on the ATV handlebar for the Hogs (again overkill but just for fun).

Problem is I can't decide between the 4" or 8+".

Also, I will be reloading for it.

Thanks for any advice.
 
Register to hide this ad
I have the 10" PC model that I love to shoot. I have never shot the 4" but I imagine recoil is more profound. I have no problem with 440 grn.
 
I've been considering the same thing. I can't justify getting one, but still I'd like to.

My LGS has two -- a new 8 3/8" for $1200 and a consignment 4" gun for $1100.

The used gun seems nearly new with box and all the papers.

They also will sell the used gun without sales tax.

But, also I wouldn't have the warranty.

The 8 3/8 seems very muzzle heavy to me. I'm older and smaller than you, but I feel like I'd need a bi-pod to hold the barrel up. (Just kidding, but it really is muzzle heavy).

The 4" seems much better balanced.

But then, the extra weight would be a plus when you touch off a round with these cannons.

Dave
 
Last edited:
Since you handload, if you think your round count will be high I think the 8 3/8" would be better. If it will be shot less frequently and with reduced loads the 4" would be handier and still heavy enough to tame the recoil.
 
I've been considering the same thing. I can't justify getting one, but still I'd like to.

My LGS has two -- a new 8 3/8" for $1200 and a consignment 4" gun for $1100.

The used gun seems nearly new with box and all the papers.

They also will sell the used gun without sales tax.

But, also I wouldn't have the warranty.

The 8 3/8 seems very muzzle heavy to me. I'm older and smaller than you, but I feel like I'd need a bi-pod to hold the barrel up. (Just kidding, but it really is muzzle heavy).

The 4" seems much better balanced.

But then, the extra weight would be a plus when you touch off a round with these cannons.

Dave


smith&wesson is going to extend the warranty to you should you need it
 
i have the 7.5"hunter model from the performance center...i do reload for it....it will make short order of large boars
 
I've been considering the same thing. I can't justify getting one, but still I'd like to.

My LGS has two -- a new 8 3/8" for $1200 and a consignment 4" gun for $1100.

The used gun seems nearly new with box and all the papers.

They also will sell the used gun without sales tax.

But, also I wouldn't have the warranty.

The 8 3/8 seems very muzzle heavy to me. I'm older and smaller than you, but I feel like I'd need a bi-pod to hold the barrel up. (Just kidding, but it really is muzzle heavy).

The 4" seems much better balanced.

But then, the extra weight would be a plus when you touch off a round with these cannons.

Dave
For what its worth i just bought the 8 3/8 fixed compensator model and only paid 999 no tax and 5 dollar shipping. I dont know if you can list sites and im not trying to advertise so anyone interested ill turn you to the sight.This was a brand new in box model and i called to confirm it was manufactured 3 weeks before i got it.
 
Last edited:
I have a pair of 8 3/8" barrel length 500's and currently in the process of shortening one of them to 6". If you are buying one just for blasting any length will work but I would go for the 4" as my first pick followed by the 8" or the better "deal".
 
Last edited:
i have the 7.5"hunter model from the performance center...i do reload for it....it will make short order of large boars

KennyB - can you sent me a link to your pistol on S&W website so I can look at it?

Thanks
 
Since you cant decide

I say split the difference and get the 6.5" Best of all worlds.

-Not as punishing as the 4"
-More balanced than the 83/8"
-Easier to carry
-Best looking (Im slightly prejudice on this one)

DSCN0358-1.jpg
 
I kind of believe that a barrel shouldn't be any longer than it needs to be. If I regularly engaged in medium to long range handgun hunting I might prefer an 8-inch barrel, but that's not my pattern. For general purpose shooting I have found that my four-inch 500 is quite accurate. I have an 8-inch 460 that is also extremely accurate, but in no way does it feel like an easy-to-shoot big-bore plinker.

For your purposes I think you should seriously consider the four inch 500. I would also invite you to think about the five-inch John Ross model, which has a couple of custom features that S&W did not see fit to put on the factory versions.
 
I have two 500s, an 8 3/8" and a 4", and love them both. If I had to choose one, though, I would keep the 8 3/8" gun. I am 6'2", weigh more than I should, have large hands, and am not recoil sensitive; however, the muzzle blast from the compensator of the short barrel gun is, at best, annoying, and with fast/light bullet loads, it is downright horrible. In fact, the first time I shot the 4" gun, I was using some 350 grain/1850-1900 fps loads, and it was nearly unbearable to shoot (muzzle blast, the recoil wasn't any big deal). I almost sold it (and I rarely sell any of my guns), but decided to try it once more with a different load (425 grain cast HP at around 1500 fps), and it became a favorite. The 8 3/8" gun is fun with any load, and will stabilize the heavy (600-750 grain) bullets, whereas they won't stabilize from the 4" barrel. Both are very accurate, with the long barrel having a slight edge over 150 yards. I recommend the 8 3/8" gun for your first foray into 500 land, it is easier to fall in love with. Be advised, you will probably buy a 4" later (as I did), but it takes some experimentation to find a load (or loads) that work well in it for you. BTW, not that it matters much, but recoil is noticeably more substantial with the 4" gun, although you will only notice the difference with light loads - heavy loads in either gun are beyond the point that most people can feel the difference - simple physics, the heavier gun resists movement to a greater degree. The difference in compensator design between the two guns does not reduce recoil in the 4" gun to the level of the 8", and certainly does not reduce it below the level of the 8" gun, as some have suggested. Whichever way you go, you're going to have a blast!
 
I had the same question, and was in the same conundrum.
I chose the 4", just because I liked the way it looked and it was easier to carry.

Maybe the 4" kicks a bit more, and it might be louder and make a bigger fireball, but isn't that what you want? :)
 
Cal50 - what is the better deal?

Cost and condition = best deal.

My 1st 500 I got from a co-worker that wanted to get rid of it after firing 3 shots. It was a good deal. My 2nd I traded into and it was good for bothof us that swapped guns. The longer barrel give you max velocity and sight radius and is great for long range or hunting but a handful to pack.
The 6" or 4" balances better ( not as nose heavy ) and can be packed easier.

 
The 4" can double as your CCW gun. 4" in Blackhills High ride holster, Aker belt, "light" 350 gr XTP. I like my 4 better than 8, A carbine in 500 is fun also. Enjoy Be Safe,
 
I'd go with the 8" and get a bandolier holster for it. I do this frequently, not with a 500 but some long barreled 44 Mags. Great for handgun hunting.

4" 500 sounds LOUD and BRIGHT!!!:eek:

I've only shot the 6.5" and 8 3/8" personally.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top