J-frame .22 magnum. Which model?

otis24

Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2004
Messages
2,081
Reaction score
1,864
Location
Central SD USA
I'm considering going from a Ruger LCP II .380 to a J frame .22 magnum for a Sunday go-to-meeting gun. Did they make an all steel hammerless .22 Magnum J frame? If so, what's the model number? This would be model number? This would be my first choice.

Second choice would be the same revolver with aluminum frame (i.e. Airweight). What is that model number?

Thanks in advance for your replys.
 
Register to hide this ad
The 351PD is the airweight.
Generally like mine but do not quite enjoy it. Heavy trigger and a bit slow to reload, but a dream weight wise. No reservations recommending regardless.
Model 351PD | Smith & Wesson
 
The only “Centennial “ enclosed hammer 22 Magnum is the 351C. It is an Airweight. If I remember correctly mine weighs 10.5 oz loaded, 7 rounds.
 
Last edited:
I wish S&W made a steel Centennial model in 22 Magnum.

The aluminum framed one is the 351C.

I really like my 43C, 8-shot .22 Long Rifle, and I was going to have my lgs order the 351C for me, but I've read many disparaging remarks on the forum about it so I passed.

I'd recommend an older 2" Model 651 and have the hammer bobbed. Spendy, because they didn't make a lot of them.

ps: Kansasgunner is quicker than me!
 
Last edited:
I have a 650, but I don't have the 22lr extra cylinder.

It's an interesting variant with fixed sights. 3 inch bull barrel.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 650 (2).jpg
    650 (2).jpg
    63.3 KB · Views: 339
I wanted the same thing, a light easy to carry 22 mag J frame. I watch every video I could find and tried to read all I could about what's available. It came down to two choices for me, the 351c and the 351pd. I ordered a 351pd, basically because (while both have pretty stiff trigger pulls), the pd can be cocked and fired single action style, with a not so bad trigger.

I wasn't concerned with pocket carry and hammer snag because I knew it would be holstered. If you plan on pocket carry, of course the 351c would be a smarter choice. My trigger is slowly getting better over the last 9 or 10 months, but I've worn out several 22 WMR snap caps getting it there.

It's been a good gun so far, and suits my needs just fine. I would recommend it to anyone. If you want a super light 22 mag (and don't need a pocket gun), and don't mind the cost, it's the ticket. I have no idea about current cost or availability tho.
 
Don't forget the blue steel model 51. I've got one of those & it's a good shooter. Very pricey now compared to when I bought mine.
 
I have the 650 and 651. They are accurate. The cost for these today are too high.

I would be looking at a newer version of the .22 mag.
 

Attachments

  • tk2.jpg
    tk2.jpg
    61.5 KB · Views: 35
  • tk3.jpg
    tk3.jpg
    59.2 KB · Views: 35
I have a 650, but I don't have the 22lr extra cylinder.

It's an interesting variant with fixed sights. 3 inch bull barrel.

attachment.php

Cal, should you want a LR cylinder, they are the exact same part# as the Mod 63. Mine was added by the Mothership just after buying the 650 new in "74.
 
Mod 51 = 3 1/2" blue steel - discontinued
Mod 351PD = 2" w/hammer "Airlite" 2004-date
Mod 351C = 2" Centennial "Airlite" 2010-date
Mod 650 = 3" Heavy barrel SS no adj sight w/hammer discontinued
Mod 651 = 3" Heavy barrel 2" rare SS adj sight w/hammer discontinued
jcelect
 
I have the 351c and the 43c. I have enjoyed the 351c and it always goes with me on range days. The trigger was stiff at first and lightened up considerably with use.

I chose the 351c specifically for the hammerless option and concealed carry, it also very light weight
 
The 351C was my choice. I have a lot of SS Centennials, so this was a natural choice (plus they were having a blow-out sale...probably should have grabbed two).

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0144.jpg
    DSC_0144.jpg
    104.6 KB · Views: 131
Back
Top