smoothshooter
Member
I carry a .22 LR automatic or revolver every day.
Nobody wants to get shot with anything.
Nobody wants to get shot with anything.
From my LEO experience, you are not taking the fight out of an enemy with a .22. It does wound people. It is popular for executions too.
.38 Special is significantly a better choice. My BUG was always a.38 Special even after we went to 9mm and later .45 ACP in the 4506.
How much of an issue is the often mentioned failure to fire of 22 mag refire -- really.
I ask this because I've shot a lot of 22mag and even more 22lr and had very few ftf's or squibs or other failures.
Center fire cartridges aren't perfect either.
Also, with more expensive defensive ammo like Gold dots, or critical defense one would expect better quality than the cheap stuff I shot as a kid.
Is this really an issue?
I have never really thought about it, but yea...I'm thinking about it now after reading this. I've got a bad back so maybe I will take a look at one of those little lightweight, 22 LR guns.
I've got a really nice High Standard Sentinel that I like a lot. It's about the size of a K-frame, but a lot lighter. Nine shot, aluminum frame. With my old (20 years or so) bulk pack Federal ammo, it will misfire from time to time, but with CCI stingers or Mini-Mags? Never has. (I don't think I've ever had a round of CCI rimfire misfire in anything.) Trigger is heavy but manageable. It's got a 4" barrel, so it's maybe a bit large for the job, but heck, I've carried a 4" revolver at times. As a matter of fact I used to carry a Sentinel as a woods bumming gun, but that was open carry. It fits any holster made for a K-frame S&W though. A fast reload pretty much ain't going to happen, even if I could find a speedloader for it.
Would I conceal carry it? Only in a real pinch, but I might keep an eye out for one of those J-frame size 22 LR's just because. I've never had any interest in the 22 mag mostly because of the noise factor, but with Stingers...I could see it.
Sometimes the choice of a handgun depends upon the physical capabilities of the shooter. For example, my wife is not only recoil averse, but she has trouble racking the slides of semi-auto pistols because of grip strength issues with her left hand. Even EZ pistols give her trouble. Bottom line- she prefers the operational simplicity of a revolver. Our son manages several gun stores, so we were able to try out a wide variety of handguns to see what she liked best for CCW. She ended up selecting a Ruger LCR .22 Magnum, and we mounted a small LaserMax red laser. She has no trouble with trigger pull on that revolver, and she is comfortable with operating and shooting it. I will soon be changing out the front sight to a XS Glow Sight because the factory ramp sight is a little difficult to see, but otherwise that revolver has performed flawlessly. The chances of my wife ever having to actually use that handgun are remote, but I'd rather her have a .22 Magnum than nothing at all.
How much of an issue is the often mentioned failure to fire of 22 mag refire -- really.
I ask this because I've shot a lot of 22mag and even more 22lr and had very few ftf's or squibs or other failures.
Center fire cartridges aren't perfect either.
Also, with more expensive defensive ammo like Gold dots, or critical defense one would expect better quality than the cheap stuff I shot as a kid.
Is this really an issue?
Up until just a couple decades ago, .22 was THE most used caliber used in homicides in the US. Now of course, it's the 9mm. Placement of any round is key in stopping a threat; therefore, any caliber is better than not having any and training is key. If a person has a problem with recoil and accuracy, I see nothing wrong with getting a 22WMR, training with it, and carrying it. Nothing at all.
Bad idea… J frame rimfires have heavy triggers, the rimfire ammo is nowhere as reliable as a primed case and a 30-40 grain bullet has minimal energy as compared to even a 38 special. You gain nothing in weight reduction compared to an airweight revolver or lightweight auto.
IMHO, a .22 has its place as a defensive arm. It is not an ideal choice by any means, but some folks have their limitations. Many folks can't shoot a high recoil pistol or revolver with any accuracy or lack the strength to rack the slide of a pistol. These same folks can probably empty a 6-8 round .22 revolver into an attacker at 7 yards and hit them with at least 3-4 rounds. If one round is dud, it will not change anything. I usually carry a 380 auto for protection but will carry my RG Saturday Night Special Revolver in my pocket when I don't expect any danger but want something in my pocket.