696 vs 696-1

Joined
Apr 7, 2009
Messages
1,283
Reaction score
2,978
Location
Sorta Downeast
Every once in a while … ok more often than that … a particular gun catches my attention. I hadn’t heard of the 696 until recently but a 5-shot 44 Special with a 3” barrel appeals to me.

Everything I’m seeing for sale now seems to be a 696-1. Is there anything better about the 696 (no dash)? Is it more rare?

I came across a reference to ported 696s made for Lew Horton. Were those done by Magnaport for the S&W factory?

What would be a reasonable price range for a 696 or 696-1 in very good condition without any box or extras?
 
Register to hide this ad
Mine is a no-dash.
The 696-1 has a frame mounted firing pin. Why this is considered inferior to the hammer mounted firing pin of the no-dash is beyond me.
There was a time when the no dash commanded a significantly higher price, but now all the L-frame defense guns are running at similar prices to what that was. I think of it as simply that the 696 was first to climb to 1500 bucks and now all the rest have followed to that price.
Mine is not for sale at any price. Period.
I am sure I would be happy with a night guard in 44, model 396.
I would prolly also like the 296 humpback, but I would still dream of the 696.
I spent a lot of hours and dollars getting good with 3" and 4" smith revolver triggers.
I want the round to be big heavy and slow. 200 grains 900 fps.
I want a 3" barrel.
This is the best available that checks the boxes for me.
I would buy one for $2000 and be happy. If I got it for the same price as a 686 I would be happy. On a certain auction site I see one with a BIN price under $1500. I would look no further. But that is gonna be an important weapon for me.
 
If I recall, the 696-1 also has the integral frame lug instead of the separate part. There was also a 696-2 with the lock. My guess is they all work the same.
 
Back in the day: when these were available, at a retail store, I looked over the 696 for $389.xx before I ever knew of the dash thing. My mentor asked if it had a hollow trigger? A what? The yoke closed so sloppily on a NIB gun, I never considered SW again until I discovered such things as M58 Nickle, M57 in presentation, M41 5.5". I would seriously like to posess a 696 if I could find a quality assembled one.
 
All things being equal, the M69 offers an improvement to the 696 inasmuch as the forcing cone is thickerer. That seems to be the one concern with the 696, whether that is warranted or not is still up for debate.

That being said, my 696 no dash is one of my favorite revolvers.

3o29pmT.jpg


9gnJzHG.jpg
 
I had a ND with box and the works that i got in a trade for my .357 Mtn Gun. I never even shot the 696 in the several years that I owned it. I traded it straight across to a friend for his NIB 5" 27-2. He regrets the trade now and wants to trade back.
 
The L frame 44's are like the famous potato chips.
It's almost impossible to stop at just one.
I have been a big fan for years but have never seen a 696-2 or even a picture.
I know they have to exist as my 696-1 has the hammer meant for a -2.
Maybe cancelled early in production?
Does anyone have one?

The 696-1 may be inherently more accurate than the 696 due to more correct chamber throat dimensions.
The 696 has it's fans because it was one of the last "traditional" S&W revolvers made
with hammer mounted firing pin and forged hammer and trigger.
As stated above, the 396Ti is way nicer to carry but kicks like a magnum because it weighs half as much as the steel versions.

The grips I like on these are the Altamont "Altai" conversion grips.
For me, they point very naturally and are super comfortable.
They are somewhat similar in design to Jerry Miculek's grips but less rounded or "bulbous"

These days if you are really wanting a 696, I'd take what you can get and afford.
The supply is limited and the demand stays solid.
Or just get a new 69.
 

Attachments

  • L-Frame-44-Trio-1024.jpg
    L-Frame-44-Trio-1024.jpg
    279.5 KB · Views: 20
Last edited:
Back
Top