If a person doesn't apply it correctly, or leaves too much (you're supposed to wipe everything down with a cloth) frog lube on the weapon I can see why they wouldn't care for it.
One of the reasons there is so much hate of the product out there is that the company has often blamed the users for problems with their product--specifically they don't wipe the stuff down. And here we are again.
Well, I followed directions and I don't like the product. I never said it failed, only that it was harder to use than other products, while not doing a significantly better job. I also said that if I valued the non-toxicity of the product more, then it would be worth it.
Frog lube is the only lube I've ever used that required a heat gun. So, yes, it's harder to apply, no joke.Too much work to use it, harder to apply, now thats a joke, right?
Frog lube is the only lube I've ever used that required a heat gun. So, yes, it's harder to apply, no joke.
Does frog lube pay people to go around to gun forums and defend their product? For the price they charge, it would probably be worth it.
One of the things that turns me off about Frog Lube is that I hear to use it (along with other new comers as well) the metal of the firearm must be "seasoned" or prepared. I do not care for products that need to be applied to metal only after they are specially treated, I just like to clean, lube and rust prevent and store away. A product that needs such special prep has never been in my ball park UNLESS it is either the only game in town for such a task or is so exemplary that it is worth the hassle. The few different products I've been using for 50+ years now has always worked just fine without letting me down so I truly have no need for extra work and experimental type treatments.