Earnest P
US Veteran
The following is a letter (not email) sent to S&W. It's pretty self explanatory. I had included a very detailed note with the pistol.
To Whom It May Concern;
I purchased a M&P22 in April, 2012. Right away I discovered how scarce magazines were. A reply to an e-mail I sent to the S&W store advised me there were a few in stock so I immediately ordered 3 online. A few days later I received a card stating they were on backorder. ???? Since they were not available elsewhere I would just have to wait.
The pistol was cleaned prior to the first trip to the range which turned into a big disappointment. The first pull of the trigger resulted in a CLICK, a misfire. An inspection of the round indicated a light primer strike. This situation repeated itself again and again, even the rounds that did ignite exhibited lighter strikes than I have ever witnessed with a .22. I tried four different brands of ammunition with the same results. It was a rarity that a full magazine functioned correctly. Each one of the misfired rounds was loaded into my Ruger and functioned fine.
Returning home I disassembled the pistol and found nothing obviously wrong. The second trip to the range was a repeat of the first. A total of 300 frustrating rounds had been expended.
I filled out the return form on-line and received a return label, the pistol was in your facility May 18th. On Monday the 21st I had a message on my machine from Jake, stating he needed to speak to me. I returned the call that afternoon only to get his voice mail, I left a message. Three days later after not hearing from him I left another message. Finally on May 28th after no replies I called customer service and the young man said he would send Jake a note. The next contact was an e-mail on June 8th, a shipping notification.
The pistol arrived on the morning of June 11th with a note saying everything was within spec, a magazine was fired without incident so no repairs were made. I could not believe what I was reading. A trip to the range that afternoon was exactly the same as the first, a CLICK with the first pull of the trigger. Misfire after misfire, light strike after light strike!! I cannot express how disappointed I am with Smith & Wesson. Now, what to do.
Feeling I had nothing to loose I decided to look deeper into the workings of the pistol. Due to continues light primer strikes I concentrated on the hammer / firing pin. With a few strokes of a file I removed .010" of material from the area of the firing pin that limits the crush depth of the pin. Back to the range resulted in 100% function, 300 rounds without so much as a hiccup. The brass now exhibit solid strikes like it should have from the start.
Let's recap;
1) I was told an item was in stock when in fact it wasn't.
2) Trained technicians were not able to observe an abnormal condition and correct it.
3) A return call was requested and then ignored.
What conclusion would you draw from this experience? I understand this is a low end, mass-produced product and situations do arise where some fine tuning to obtain reliable function is necessary but it shouldn't be left to the customer. If I, a simple country boy, can diagnose a problem, a Smith & Wesson "Pistol Tech" sure should.
END
Searching the threads I find this is evidently an anomaly for this model of pistol. It's a shame the "Pistol Techs" can't recognize a light primer strike. Pistol Tech is S&W's label, not Pistolsmith or Gunsmith.
When all is said and done, the pistol is working great. I'm just not sure about the repair facility.
To Whom It May Concern;
I purchased a M&P22 in April, 2012. Right away I discovered how scarce magazines were. A reply to an e-mail I sent to the S&W store advised me there were a few in stock so I immediately ordered 3 online. A few days later I received a card stating they were on backorder. ???? Since they were not available elsewhere I would just have to wait.
The pistol was cleaned prior to the first trip to the range which turned into a big disappointment. The first pull of the trigger resulted in a CLICK, a misfire. An inspection of the round indicated a light primer strike. This situation repeated itself again and again, even the rounds that did ignite exhibited lighter strikes than I have ever witnessed with a .22. I tried four different brands of ammunition with the same results. It was a rarity that a full magazine functioned correctly. Each one of the misfired rounds was loaded into my Ruger and functioned fine.
Returning home I disassembled the pistol and found nothing obviously wrong. The second trip to the range was a repeat of the first. A total of 300 frustrating rounds had been expended.
I filled out the return form on-line and received a return label, the pistol was in your facility May 18th. On Monday the 21st I had a message on my machine from Jake, stating he needed to speak to me. I returned the call that afternoon only to get his voice mail, I left a message. Three days later after not hearing from him I left another message. Finally on May 28th after no replies I called customer service and the young man said he would send Jake a note. The next contact was an e-mail on June 8th, a shipping notification.
The pistol arrived on the morning of June 11th with a note saying everything was within spec, a magazine was fired without incident so no repairs were made. I could not believe what I was reading. A trip to the range that afternoon was exactly the same as the first, a CLICK with the first pull of the trigger. Misfire after misfire, light strike after light strike!! I cannot express how disappointed I am with Smith & Wesson. Now, what to do.
Feeling I had nothing to loose I decided to look deeper into the workings of the pistol. Due to continues light primer strikes I concentrated on the hammer / firing pin. With a few strokes of a file I removed .010" of material from the area of the firing pin that limits the crush depth of the pin. Back to the range resulted in 100% function, 300 rounds without so much as a hiccup. The brass now exhibit solid strikes like it should have from the start.
Let's recap;
1) I was told an item was in stock when in fact it wasn't.
2) Trained technicians were not able to observe an abnormal condition and correct it.
3) A return call was requested and then ignored.
What conclusion would you draw from this experience? I understand this is a low end, mass-produced product and situations do arise where some fine tuning to obtain reliable function is necessary but it shouldn't be left to the customer. If I, a simple country boy, can diagnose a problem, a Smith & Wesson "Pistol Tech" sure should.
END
Searching the threads I find this is evidently an anomaly for this model of pistol. It's a shame the "Pistol Techs" can't recognize a light primer strike. Pistol Tech is S&W's label, not Pistolsmith or Gunsmith.
When all is said and done, the pistol is working great. I'm just not sure about the repair facility.