|
 |

10-16-2023, 11:10 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 14
Likes: 15
Liked 14 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
SD9VE Accuracy
Tried to get a good group at 25 yards with off-hand slow firing. 10-shot group size is typically 9", with various brands of ammo. Everything on my SD9VE is factory set (sights, trigger, et al.)
To see how much of the grouping spread is due to my grip, I shot 5 rounds off sandbag support, with CCI Blazer 115gr brass. To my surprise, it grouped 7", not much better than my off-hand 10-shot grouping.
Not sure this bad grouping (7" 5-shots) is due to my trigger pull, ammo, or the gun.
What is your experience with the accuracy of SD9VE?
Last edited by SunnySky; 10-16-2023 at 11:11 PM.
|

10-17-2023, 03:49 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ames Iowa
Posts: 869
Likes: 14
Liked 1,021 Times in 500 Posts
|
|
Mine is fine, but I never shoot pistols at twenty five yards. Ten to maybe fifteen is about all I can handle. I don't think I'm alone in that.
I did put an Apex trigger in mine and I think that made a significant improvement. For a stock SD series I'd say you're getting about what would be expected.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

10-17-2023, 04:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,194
Likes: 4,319
Liked 12,477 Times in 3,877 Posts
|
|
I have owned a few original Sigmas, and a few of the later versions. I am a mediocre pistol shot. In my limited time with those guns I would say Minute Of Grapefruit at 10-20 yards was normal.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

10-17-2023, 05:44 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Winston Salem
Posts: 569
Likes: 2,218
Liked 796 Times in 357 Posts
|
|
Sandbag support?
Not an owner. Been watching to see if someone who is can comment, but my first reaction is pistol is Okay.
You do not say how you did this exactly. Depending on how you did it, a 7 inch grouping at 25 yards is reasonably good. I want to shoot better than 9 inches offhand including the "flyer". Take a look at the "Defoor Hat Qual". Daniel Ready at PrimerPeak.com describes how he did. If you take a look at other shooters who are shooting the challenge you will see that your weapon may very well be adequate to win the hat.
The group is 10 rounds.
The time is 20 seconds including your draw from carry.
You get three tries.
You must score 90 in a single string of fire on a B-8 target.
Other shooters are using longer barrels and fancy optics.
I shoot this sometimes with a S&W 457 which has a 3.75" bbl.
I tried it once with a CS40 with a 3.25" bbl. Fun!
Though I shoot the group size in the time, it is not centered enough to win the hat. I would need to adjust the loads to the springs and fine tune the setting of the rear sight to win the hat, but if I can score 80 at that range I am very pleased with myself especially with a stock 3rd gen DA/SA and iron sights. Also I am working on other skills right now.
Let me know if this was any help?
BrianD
__________________
696-6906-457-38-3913-CS40-411
Last edited by Brian Parrish; 10-17-2023 at 05:52 PM.
Reason: Add comment
|

10-17-2023, 08:27 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 14
Likes: 15
Liked 14 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Brian, To pass the Kyle Defoor's Hat Qual one practically (not absolutely) needs to land 9 of 10 shots in a 6" group centered at the bullseye, off-hand shooting.
To get a baseline, I tried 5 shots on benchtop with my pistol resting on a sandbag. Since my group was 7" already, there is no way I can pass the the qual off-hand with more shots and a time limit.
Is this 7" grouping mainly due to my error (sight picture, trigger control), the SD9VE capablility, or poor ammo? I'd like to know people's opinions and experience.
I may go to the range and repeat it with a different brand of ammo.
Last edited by SunnySky; 10-18-2023 at 08:27 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

10-18-2023, 10:20 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ames Iowa
Posts: 869
Likes: 14
Liked 1,021 Times in 500 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColbyBruce
I have owned a few original Sigmas, and a few of the later versions. I am a mediocre pistol shot. In my limited time with those guns I would say Minute Of Grapefruit at 10-20 yards was normal.
|
That would be my experience. Decent pistol but not noted for tack driving accuracy. I like mine, it fits my hand very well, but I have many pistols that are more accurate.
|

10-18-2023, 05:57 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Winston Salem
Posts: 569
Likes: 2,218
Liked 796 Times in 357 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunnySky
Brian, To pass the Kyle Defoor's Hat Qual one practically (not absolutely) needs to land 9 of 10 shots in a 6" group centered at the bullseye, off-hand shooting...
|
I understand. There are some guys with some pistols who shoot 2 inches from a bag all day long. I have one gun that will do that but not in my hands.
Please let us know the details when you go try again. I would also like to know if it makes any difference to rest only the hands on the bag rather than the barrel. Col. Jeff Cooper taught to do that with rifles, which makes a big difference for me. I do it with pistols also but I don't know if it makes much difference If you can get tight 25 yard groups with other guns but not this one, then I'll wonder why. The SD9VE ought to shoot just like a Glock 19.
Maybe that statement will get a rise out of somebody and we'll see more comments.
__________________
696-6906-457-38-3913-CS40-411
|

10-18-2023, 06:36 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,194
Likes: 3,733
Liked 5,263 Times in 2,199 Posts
|
|
I've used various Sigma series pistols for loaners and trainers for nearly two decades. I like them for beginners because a "trigger yanker" will show up immediately, and work on trigger control can begin immediately.
If you're paying for professional help, might as well get to the real problem right away.
IMHO, most any quality ammo is adequate, the Sigma is plenty accurate for defensive (or IDPA) shooting, but it requires decent trigger control. Trigger yankers will spend much money trying to get a shorter, lighter trigger pull to mask the problem instead of learning proper technique.
People who learn to shoot revolver IDPA first usually are better at coping with long double action pulls, and learn to pull firmly but smoothly, without jerking.
Just let the front sight do its figure 8s and keep pulling until the gun fires.
If you try to jerk the trigger when the sights are "just right", it will be a sorry shot.
__________________
Science plus Art
Last edited by OKFC05; 10-18-2023 at 06:38 PM.
|

10-19-2023, 12:53 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 14
Likes: 15
Liked 14 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Went to the range and tried again today. This time I used the Sellier & Bellot 124gr FMJ. Pistol was supported the same way as previous time, with a sandbag under the tactical flash light which was attached under the barrel. My shooting position was different this time: I sat on a rifle bench the previous time, but had to bend this time on a handgun table.
5-shot grouping was under 6", compared with over 7" previous time. However, I felt this improvement was by chance, not statistically significant.
Felt hopeless at 25 yards, I moved the target to 10 yards and fast fired 5 rounds under 5 seconds. To my surprise, it grouped almost exactly 2", centered on the bullseye.
I speculate part of the reason for my poor grouping at 25 yards is my aging eyes. Although I always try to focus on the front sight, from time to time the front sight becomes blurry, so aligning the tip of the front sight with the tip of the rear U-notch is out of the question. In addition, at 25 yards the front sight post covers a 6" width on the target.
I wonder maybe a RDS will help, but not sure because I don't have one.
Last edited by SunnySky; 10-19-2023 at 01:01 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

10-19-2023, 11:50 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: MD
Posts: 86
Likes: 4
Liked 18 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
First off, a 9" off hand group at 25 is not bad at all. Especially for a defensive gun. I never see much improvement using a rest, so a 3" reduction would be completely acceptable to me.
I wonder what these guns do from a vice..
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

10-19-2023, 01:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 14
Likes: 15
Liked 14 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Yeah, it would be great if someone has tested the inherent accuracy of the SD9VE. I remember reading it somewhere that a decent pistol on a ransom rest will group about 2" at 25 yards with good ammo. Not sure if SD9VE can reach this accuracy or not.
Another variable is ammo. A few years ago, Brad Miller tested 38 types of 9mm ammo with a 5" 1911 mounted on a ransom rest. His 50-shot grouping varied from under 2" to about 6", depending on the ammo type. It looks like ammo plays an important role in pistol shooting accuracy.
Last edited by SunnySky; 10-19-2023 at 03:18 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

10-19-2023, 02:40 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Winston Salem
Posts: 569
Likes: 2,218
Liked 796 Times in 357 Posts
|
|
2 inches at 10 yards
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunnySky
Went to the range and tried again today. This time I used the Sellier & Bellot 124gr FMJ. Pistol was supported the same way as previous time, with a sandbag under the tactical flash light which was attached under the barrel. My shooting position was different this time: I sat on a rifle bench the previous time, but had to bend this time on a handgun table.
5-shot grouping was under 6", compared with over 7" previous time. However, I felt this improvement was by chance, not statistically significant.
Felt hopeless at 25 yards, I moved the target to 10 yards and fast fired 5 rounds under 5 seconds. To my surprise, it grouped almost exactly 2", centered on the bullseye.
I speculate part of the reason for my poor grouping at 25 yards is my aging eyes. Although I always try to focus on the front sight, from time to time the front sight becomes blurry, so aligning the tip of the front sight with the tip of the rear U-notch is out of the question. In addition, at 25 yards the front sight post covers a 6" width on the target.
I wonder maybe a RDS will help, but not sure because I don't have one.
|
Thanks for the update. You have earned my admiration! Please if you keep getting better and figure things out I will be very interested. I am more interested in the SD40VE rather than yours, and I am also very interested in anyone dealing with "aging eyes".
Someone else would need to do the physics equation for me, but the 2" group at ten yards is the same cone of accuracy for stock sights as the 5"+ group at 25 yards, right? You are shooting well IMHO, and the pistol is fine. If it were me I would get some drugstore reading glasses to see that front sight like when I was a boy and shoot the drill again. The front dot is bigger than the target at that range as you said, so... Still waiting for an actual owner to give us some data.
Kind regards!!
BrianD
__________________
696-6906-457-38-3913-CS40-411
|

10-19-2023, 03:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,500
Likes: 2,391
Liked 6,702 Times in 3,310 Posts
|
|
I've no direct experience, but reading comments by varioius gun scribes seems to show that the poly pistols don't do all that well from a Ransom Rest due to frame flex.
Reading your last post provides some clues. First, you need to work on your trigger press. Dryfire practice (Make sure the guns unloaded and there's no ammo in the room.) will help you with this. The front sight should still be on target when you hear the "click".
Now then, about your eyes. I feel your pain. If you wear glasses, the folks who make safety glasses can help you. Decades ago I started wearing "magic glasses" to shoot. These had an occupational grind that put my close vision correction in both the lower and upper part of the lens, distance vision in the center. When I had to resort to trifocals, the middle distance correction went to the top of the lens, distance in the middle and near vision at the conventional bottom part. Sharp sight pictures was just a slight forward head tilt away.
I've also found a stainless front sight is far more visible to me than black sights. A red dot works too, but presents other issues besides cost.
Last edited by WR Moore; 10-19-2023 at 03:25 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

10-26-2023, 01:19 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Posts: 22,370
Likes: 29,218
Liked 33,791 Times in 12,486 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunnySky
Yeah, it would be great if someone has tested the inherent accuracy of the SD9VE. I remember reading it somewhere that a decent pistol on a ransom rest will group about 2" at 25 yards with good ammo. Not sure if SD9VE can reach this accuracy or not.
Another variable is ammo. A few years ago, Brad Miller tested 38 types of 9mm ammo with a 5" 1911 mounted on a ransom rest. His 50-shot grouping varied from under 2" to about 6", depending on the ammo type. It looks like ammo plays an important role in pistol shooting accuracy.
|
Ammo can be a bigger influence than many realize. My theory is that not only is there the consistency of the ammo an issue, but the precise shape of the ogive and the amount of bearing surface. For sure it can be a major factor with rifles.
Then there is the question of velocity. Some of the watered down plinking ammo barely ejects, so it's unlikely to be moving downrange at any great pace either. The OP mentioned he was using 115gr Blazer Brass. That would not be my first choice to test the mechanical accuracy of any pistol at 25 yards. The S&B mentioned will have a bit more punch as they usually load to near NATO standard. Winchester White Box is 115gr has shown more zip than Blazer in recent chrono tests on Youtube, but again it is sold as plinking/practice ammo. Match grade FMJ ammo in 9mm is a bit hard to come by and usually expensive compared to the regular stuff. Maybe some JHP Speer Gold Dots or something similar would be a suitable substitute.
__________________
Release the Kraken
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

10-27-2023, 01:39 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: NW Montana
Posts: 67
Likes: 115
Liked 98 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
I happen to be headed to the range in a bit, and will post my target after I return. I've had no issues with my SD9VE at all usually shoot from appropriate self defense yardages using B-27 silhouette targets.
Last edited by JonE406; 10-27-2023 at 01:40 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

12-02-2023, 04:04 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 258
Likes: 431
Liked 188 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
At Self Defense distances, I am more accurate with my SD9VE with factory trigger than I am with my Shield 2.0 9mm with Hyve Monarch trigger. Both have blacked out rear factory sights.
Sent from my SM-A205U using Tapatalk
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

12-06-2023, 02:48 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Scott county,Tennessee
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 375
Liked 680 Times in 388 Posts
|
|
That makes sense to me. I have owned both before and really liked the SD. It really makes a nice carry gun……..more ammo capacity in these uncertain times.
__________________
JAREDSHS
LEO(retired)
|

12-17-2023, 02:50 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SC
Posts: 408
Likes: 128
Liked 282 Times in 131 Posts
|
|
My best results in a stock SD9VE came with 124 grain FMJ ammo and a rather quick trigger press. No long, slow, gradual squeeze but sights on target and a fast press. 3" groups at 25 yards were possible and not uncommon. Federal American Eagle, PMC, and Fiocchi proved to be the most accurate for me.
Best Regards,
ADP3
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

12-17-2023, 02:24 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Arizona
Posts: 163
Likes: 188
Liked 295 Times in 103 Posts
|
|
Sight picture, sight alignment, trigger management and practice, practice, practice. Triggers and sights can't make up for poor fundamentals.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

01-07-2024, 11:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I've owned my Sigma since 2002/3. It was my EDC Concealed until I got my Kahr P9. I got good groups out to 15 yards. 25 yards got a bit larger.
It's no Beretta or 1911 but served me quite well for tactical shooting at our outdoor range. Still qualify with it for my ccw. I can't recall having a stovepipe.
|

03-06-2024, 03:29 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 2,416
Likes: 1,406
Liked 1,685 Times in 1,016 Posts
|
|
At 25 yards someone better be shooting AT you for it to be considered as a defensive situation...
One often practices at that distance so the practical 7-10 yard results are demonstrably better.
My Sigma in 40 S&W is probably as accurate (for me) as my M&Ps, but I have shot it for years. Is it my familiarity or something else? M&P triggers are without a doubt much better.
Polymer pistol "flex" in a rest is probably miniscule at best. All steel pistols just don't...
A red dot sight should improve one's performance, especially with older eyes. Doubtful the cost to have a slide milled for one makes much $en$e now-a-days when so many new pistols often have an optics cut model available. I bought a 2nd slide for my SW40VE with that in mind years ago and (after regaining my sanity) picked up a new PC C.O.R.E for about $100 more than the milling and shipping would have cost!
Cheers!
__________________
Sit Reloader Sentiret
|

03-06-2024, 09:15 AM
|
 |
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 587
Likes: 519
Liked 1,224 Times in 359 Posts
|
|
I actually used mine as a qualification gun for my Florida armed security license after I moved here and retired from another state LE.
I like the gun and will never get rid of it, but it does have its limitations. I doubt I could ever score perfectly with it, but if I put my Glock away and concentrate on how this gun functions alone, it can be pretty formidable.
Really for the money, this is the best deal around. It has a Glock 19 size and capacity but with a Taurus price...Practice with the trigger and you can get quite proficient.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

03-09-2024, 12:46 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 457
Likes: 101
Liked 789 Times in 212 Posts
|
|
I have an SD9VE that I've owned for at least a decade. It's currently my home defense gun. I've shot it a modest amount, and it puts its shots in there but I have trouble making "pretty" groups at ten yards due to the heavy yet spongy trigger. For what the pistol was designed for however it's not an issue. I actually like the idea of a lawyer-proof trigger on a gun I might have to grab at 3am when I'm suddenly awakened from my sleep and having trouble processing what is going on. Once the adrenaline kicks in however an 8lb trigger ain't gonna stop me from being able to connect with a threat 20 feet away.
The new 2.0 models have a lighter trigger, as do the Apex kits, but I'm not using this pistol for any other purpose so its staying factory stock.
Last edited by dsk; 03-09-2024 at 12:47 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

03-16-2024, 10:11 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Running down a dream
Posts: 612
Likes: 1,696
Liked 562 Times in 272 Posts
|
|
[QUOTE=dsk;141947757]I have an SD9VE that I've owned for at least a decade. It's currently my home defense gun. I've shot it a modest amount, and it puts its shots in there but I have trouble making "pretty" groups at ten yards due to the heavy yet spongy trigger. For what the pistol was designed for however it's not an issue. I actually like the idea of a lawyer-proof trigger on a gun I might have to grab at 3am when I'm suddenly awakened from my sleep and having trouble processing what is going on. Once the adrenaline kicks in however an 8lb trigger ain't gonna stop me from being able to connect with a threat 20 feet away.
I have a SW40VE and I feel the same lately- have kept it out of the safe as the home duty pistol…it’ll do it’s part of functioning and I fear the monetary loss of this gun less if stolen yet trust it with my life with it’s decent accuracy and great function. I have used it as a long trip companion when traveling across multiple states in a company vehicle too recently and, again, less fear of losing one of my higher dollar handguns on a trip. Cheers, Mike
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|